Supply chain financing offers advantages over traditional channels such as bank loans and equity financing, including greater flexibility, lower transaction costs, and simplified approval procedures. However, when a firm’s sustainability faces uncertainty, access to supply chain financing may become constrained by multiple factors, including the risk tolerance of supply chain partners, market transparency, and corporate reputation. ESG, representing Environmental, Social, and Governance standards, is a critical framework for assessing corporate sustainability performance. Given that divergent ESG evaluations reflect disparate market assessments of a firm’s sustainable development capabilities, such divergence may affect supply chain financing by altering stakeholder trust dynamics. This research examines A-share listed firms in China (2016–2022) and reveals that divergence in ESG evaluations significantly inhibits firms’ access to supply chain financing. Mechanism validation suggests that divergent ESG evaluations amplify informational opacity, operational risks, and negative reputation, thereby influencing supply chain partners’ risk perceptions and trust levels. Heterogeneity analysis shows that corporate governance quality, regional trust levels, and ESG awareness modulate the negative impact of divergent ESG evaluations on supply chain financing. The asymmetric effects of divergent ESG evaluations on supply chain financing are further confirmed, with distinct manifestations between upstream suppliers and downstream customers. By bridging gaps in existing research on divergent ESG evaluations and supply chain finance, this work offers regulatory guidelines, operational recommendations for firms, and investment decision frameworks.

ESG serves as a key metric for measuring corporate sustainability, but divergence among rating agencies has led to uncertainty in such an assessment. This investigation identifies ESG rating divergence as a critical catalyst for corporate digital transformation, establishing empirical analysis through a robust positive correlation between the heterogeneity in sustainability assessments and organizational digitalization intensity. Comprehensive robustness examinations and endogeneity controls substantiate the persistent significance of this relationship. Mechanistically, such divergence drives technological adaptation by restructuring the R&D team composition and elevating capital allocation toward innovative initiatives. Contextual heterogeneity manifests through amplified effects in firms with elevated analyst scrutiny and stringent internal governance, whereas pollution-intensive enterprises exhibit significant effect suppression. These findings collectively advance theoretical frameworks concerning ESG evaluation economics and digital transformation drivers, while furnishing actionable implementation blueprints for corporate digitization strategists.