Dietary supplement use is common among US adults. We aimed to investigate the quantity, duration, adherence, and reasons for supplement use in individuals who take supplements. Data from 2011 to 2018 from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset were analyzed. Four cycles of data were combined to estimate these outcomes. Results are presented as overall group and by subgroups. All analyses were weighted to be nationally representative. The Taylor Series Linearization approach was used to generate variance estimates. A total of 12,529 participants were included. Over 70% of these individuals reported taking more than one unit of dietary supplements daily. Notably, approximately 40% had been taking supplements for more than five years and about 67% were highly adherent to at least one supplement. However, only 26.9% of these supplements were taken following a doctor’s recommendation. The primary reasons for dietary supplements intake included improving overall health (37.2%), maintaining health (34.7%), bone health (21.4%), and diet supplementation (20.3%). Our findings indicate that most participants proactively used multiple dietary supplements focused on self-managed health and prevention, with substantial dedication to long-term use and high adherence. Healthcare professionals should play a more active role in guiding such behaviors to optimize the health outcomes of dietary supplement users across the United States.

Background: As a non-invasive and effective diagnostic method for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO), wild-use of breath test (BT) has demonstrated a high comorbidity rate in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) and SIBO. Patients overlapping with SIBO respond better to rifaximin therapy than those with IBS-D only. Gut microbiota plays a critical role in both of these two diseases. We aimed to determine the microbial difference between IBS-D overlapping with/without SIBO, and to study the underlying mechanism of its sensitivity to rifaximin. Methods: Patients with IBS-D were categorized as BT-negative (IBSN) and BT-positive (IBSP). Healthy volunteers (BT-negative) were enrolled as healthy control. The patients were clinically evaluated before and after rifaximin treatment (0.4 g bid, 4 weeks). Blood, intestine, and stool samples were collected for cytokine assessment and gut microbial analyses. Results: Clinical complaints and microbial abundance were significantly higher in IBSP than in IBSN. In contrast, severe systemic inflammation and more active bacterial invasion function that were associated with enrichment of opportunistic pathogens were seen in IBSN. The symptoms of IBSP patients were relieved in different degrees after therapy, but the symptoms of IBSN rarely changed. We also found that the presence of IBSN-enriched genera (Enterobacter and Enterococcus) are unaffected by rifaximin therapy. Conclusions: IBS-D patients overlapping with SIBO showed noticeably different fecal microbial composition and function compared with IBS-D only. The better response to rifaximin in those comorbid patients might associate with their different gut microbiota, which suggests that BT is necessary before IBS-D diagnosis and use of rifaximin. Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800017911.

Background/Objectives: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with opioid use disorder (OUD) frequently have co-occurring psychiatric conditions and substance use disorders (SUDs). This study evaluated the association of psychiatric comorbidities and other SUDs with treatment retention and urine drug test (UDT) results in AYAs with OUD. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included AYAs enrolled in the Substance Use Treatment and Recovery clinic from 2009 to 2022. Participants were categorized into four groups: no comorbidities, only mental health disorders, only other SUDs, and both disorders. Treatment outcomes included retention time and UDT results for medication for OUD (MOUD) and illicit substances, including tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to evaluate differences across groups, and regression models identified variables associated with outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Among 157 patients, the median retention time was 300 days. Depression (p = 0.04), post-traumatic stress disorder (p = 0.002), and alcohol use disorder (p = 0.04) were associated with prolonged retention, whereas cannabis use disorder predicted shorter retention (p = 0.02). The median proportion of positive UDTs was 0.9 for MOUD, 0.1 for illicit substances, and 0.0 for THC. Older age (p = 0.02) and the use of antidepressants and anxiolytics were associated with greater adherence to MOUD. Cannabis use disorder (p = 0.02) and male sex (p = 0.04) predicted positive UDTs for THC, while MOUD use was linked to lower THC positivity (p = 0.02). The main limitations of this study were related to its retrospective study design and single-center setting. Conclusions: Psychiatric and substance use comorbidities significantly influence retention and treatment adherence in AYAs with OUD. Integrated treatment may improve engagement and outcomes. Further research is needed to tailor interventions for AYAs with co-occurring disorders.

Objective: To investigate the effects of prophylactic use of stimulant laxatives and/or docusate on the clinical outcomes in critically ill patients who required mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study was conducted. Patients who received MV in the first 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission were enrolled and divided into four groups: non-laxative, stimulant laxatives, docusate, and stimulant laxatives–docusate combination. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The major secondary outcomes included ICU-free days and ventilator-free days at 28 days; the other outcomes were ventilation-associated pneumonia (VAP), enterobacterial infection, diarrhea, and electrolyte disturbances. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounders. Results: A total of 2129 patients were included in this study, 263 of whom received stimulant laxatives, 253 received docusate, 368 received a combination, and 1245 did not receive any laxative. The prophylactic use of docusate was associated with a decreased risk of in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.59, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83, p = 0.002) and VAP (OR: 0.62, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.81, p = 0.001). It was also associated with an increase in ICU-free days at 28 days (β: 0.89, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.95, p < 0.001). Importantly, laxatives prophylaxis was not associated with increased risks of diarrhea, electrolyte disturbances, and enterobacterial infections. Conclusions: Prophylactic use of docusate may improve certain prognoses and does not demonstrate any adverse events. However, further research is necessary to determine the optimal regimen and dosage of prophylactic laxatives in this specific population.