Due to the increasing concern about the negative impact of the modern food system and the need to design foods to improve their healthiness and sustainability, in the current study, a fortified cheesecake was developed by using juice, peels, and pomace from prickly pears, which are fruit by-products rich in active compounds. After proper dehydration and being ground to produce a fine powder, some traditional ingredients were substituted with fruit juice and by-products. The water content loss during dehydration and the energy consumed per g of dehydrated by-product were assessed using a proper mathematical approach. A sensory evaluation was carried out using a panel test, thus verifying that the new dessert made with prickly pears was comparable to the traditional one; both recorded high scores of acceptability (sensory score ranged between 8 and 9). The centesimal composition of the two cheesecakes also demonstrated that the ingredient substitution did not affect the energetic value of the final product (290 vs. 248 kcal/100 g); on the contrary, it promoted an increase in carbohydrates (27.38 vs. 26.26 g/100 g), lipids (16.98 vs. 12.94 g/100 g), and total fibers (5.7 vs. 4.2 g/100 g). To demonstrate that the recycling of by-products from prickly pears could represent an advantage from an environmental point of view, a full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was carried out. In relation to this, three environmental impact categories, such as Global Warming Potential, Acidification and Eutrophication, which are associated with three different biowaste treatment options—such as composting, landfilling, and recycling—were assessed. The results from the LCA highlighted that recycling always emerged as the most sustainable biowaste management option. For all environmental impact categories analyzed, recycling resulted in an overall environmental saving (−7.63 kgCO₂eq/kg biowaste; −0.116 kgSO₂eq/kg biowaste; and −0.055 kgPO₄³⁻eq/kg biowaste). In addition, the comparison between the traditional cheesecake and the fortified one, in terms of impacts per kg of cheesecake, demonstrated that replacing food items with recycled biowaste may result in a general reduction in emissions and resources. Therefore, this case study represents a valid example of zero-waste production, offering a concrete suggestion as to how processed foods can be redesigned to make them healthier from a more sustainable perspective.

Fresh pasta was enriched with olive pomace (OP) and artichoke by-products (AB), respectively, at three concentrations: 13.5%, 14.5%, and 15% for OP, and 15%, 17%, and 19% for AB. Both control and fortified samples were assessed for technological properties, nutritional content and sensory quality. A Life Cycle Assessment was also performed to estimate the carbon footprint associated with pasta production. Results demonstrated a worsening of pasta quality, above all the resistance to break for row pasta and sandiness and taste for cooked samples, even though the pasta remained in an acceptable range. Fibers, polyphenol content, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity were found to be better in fortified samples than in the control pasta. With AB as new ingredient, the antioxidant activity increased substantially. The environmental impact revealed two different scenarios: compared to the control (1.08 kgCO₂eq), lower carbon footprint values were found for pasta fortified with OP (from 0.96 to 0.98 kgCO₂eq) and higher values for pasta fortified with AB (from 1.53 to 1.62 kgCO₂eq), due to the energy consumption associated with by-product processing (dehydration at 50 °C and grinding). Thus, combining sensory quality, nutritional improvements and environmental impact, a Global Quality Index (GQI) was also calculated for each sample. The GQI values, according to the weighting scheme of this index, revealed that the benefits of AB superimposed the drawbacks and suggested that 15% AB fortification is the best solution to balance pros and cons of by-product recycling.