(1) Podcasts are increasingly used in undergraduate medical education. They differ from traditional learning activities and may influence exam performance. Podcasts also offer insights into learning behaviour and perceptions of family medicine (FM). Despite their frequent use in medical education, it remains unclear how they can best be integrated into competency-based curricula and motivate students to study for FM. This study examines the impact of a medical podcast on learning behaviour and academic performance at Saarland University (UdS). (2) This exploratory mixed-methods study analyzed podcast-related learning behaviour and exam relevance among year-five medical students at UdS in the winter semester 2024/25. Demographic, quantitative, and qualitative data were collected via an online questionnaire (Google Forms^®) in January 2025. Data were descriptively and analytically evaluated and linked to exam results. Qualitative data were analyzed using Kuckartz’s content analysis. (3) Of 123 eligible students, 92 participated. Most listened to episodes in full. Podcasts were seen as low-threshold means to access study content, but they were often not perceived as a separate learning activity. Listening to podcasts did not directly influence exam performance but helped connecting theory with clinical relevance and increased motivation for FM. (4) Podcasts are popular for exploring clinical practice and complex topics. Their didactic value lies in contextual learning and career orientation, rather than improving exam performance.

Background: Professional identity formation (PIF) and wellbeing are increasingly being recognised in postgraduate Family Medicine (FM) education. Role models are central to both, yet traditional learning activities often struggle to implement them effectively. Podcasts offer a flexible medium that may support these goals. This study examines the potential of postgraduate medical education (PGME) podcasts, such as the European Young Family Doctor’s Movement (EYFDM) podcast, to promote PIF and wellbeing. Methods: This mixed-methods study analyses podcast use, role modelling effects, and PIF among young general practitioners (GPs). In 2024, 57 participants, including students, FM trainees, and specialists, completed an online questionnaire with quantitative and qualitative items. Descriptive and analytical statistics were combined with qualitative content analysis (Kuckartz). Sentiment analysis was conducted using artificial intelligence, and triangulation enhanced credibility. Results: Within the trainees and specialists of the study population, most participants (70%; 32/46 SPs) reported regularly using podcasts for PGME, and particularly young female GPs in Western Europe. In our study population, 90% (27/30 SPs) agreed that the podcasts broadened their perspective on professional opportunities in FM. Many participants reported reflections on potential career pathways and PIF. Exposure to role models significantly increased motivation to work in FM (χ² (1) = 10.7, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Podcasts may help address gaps in affective competency training, including wellbeing and PIF, while integrating easily into busy routines. Findings suggest a positive influence on career attitudes, with role modelling supporting PIF and motivation in FM.

Background: In-person conferences (IPCs) in family medicine remain central for cross-border collaboration and early-career development. With the rise of digital formats, the motivations of young general practitioners (GPs) to attend or organise IPCs require closer investigation. Methods: Using a modified two-round Delphi design, we surveyed 107 participants and 23 organisers of the 2024 and 2025 EYFDM (European Young Family Doctors’ Movement) Forums. Round one included open and closed questions; round two involved prioritisation tasks. Quantitative data were analysed with non-parametric statistics; qualitative responses were thematically coded. Results: Participants primarily attended in-person conferences for networking (56.1%), workshops, and inspiration, while formal content played a secondary role. Organisers emphasised personal development, citing project management and teamwork as key benefits, though 34.8% reported workload and lack of recognition as major barriers. A strong preference for in-person formats (94.4%) reflected the perceived importance of interpersonal interaction, which online formats could not replicate. Conclusions: The findings highlight IPC as key environments for identity formation, motivation, and sustainable European collaboration in family medicine. Organising offers learning opportunities but demands better structural support. Future conference planning must prioritise in-person interaction, while using hybrid formats as complementary tools. IPCs remain essential for fostering authentic networks and collaboration among young GPs.

(1) Background: While the benefits of digital assessments for universities and educators are well documented, students’ perspectives remain underexplored. (2) Methods: This study employed an exploratory mixed-methods approach. Three examination cohorts were included (winter semester 2022/23, summer semester 2023, and winter semester 2023/24). Written emotional responses to receiving just-in-time summative or formative feedback were analyzed, as well as examining the impact of formative feedback on learning attitudes. All cohorts completed qualitative open-ended research questions. The responses were coded using Kuckartz’s qualitative content analysis. Descriptive statistics were generated using jamovi. (3) Results: Students generally responded positively to formative and summative feedback. The majority expressed a desire to receive feedback. The categories created for formative feedback indicate a tendency toward self-reflection and supported the learning processes. In contrast, the summative feedback categories suggest that students primarily value feedback’s transactional aspect. (4) Conclusions: Integrating formative and summative feedback in digital just-in-time assessment offers the potential to capitalize on the “sensitive periods” of study reflection that occur during assessment. This approach enables assessment for learning while simultaneously reducing emotional distress for students.