This study investigated lifestyle factors among Hungarian and international students, utilizing lifestyle medicine principles to enhance overall well-being. Conducted at the University of Debrecen through a cross-sectional survey, we examined selected lifestyle factors, more specifically sleep patterns, weight management, nutrition, physical activity, mental well-being, and alcohol use. Hungarian (N = 122) and international (N = 139) students were compared, revealing significant differences. Hungarian students slept less (p = 0.041), desired weight loss (p = 0.040), ate more fruits and vegetables (p = 0.014), exercised longer (p = 0.002), and reported higher purpose and social support (p = 0.009), with higher alcohol use (p < 0.001). These findings highlight distinct experiences and challenges faced by these student groups including variations in sleep, weight management, diet, exercise, and social support. Targeted interventions and tailored support are essential to address their specific needs. To promote the well-being of both Hungarian and international students, educational programs addressing various facets of a healthy lifestyle are crucial. This study offers valuable insights into lifestyle factors and health outcomes among Hungarian and international students and underscores the importance of addressing the unique needs of each group through tailored interventions.

The structural integrity of the Hungarian healthcare system is threatened by a systemic shortage of General Practitioners (GPs), with 1021 districts remaining vacant as of March 2026. This study assessed demographic characteristics, perceived career attributes, and temperament and character traits of 144 medical students and 72 practicing GPs, achieving an overall response rate of 91.5%, using the TCI-55 inventory to identify factors influencing professional pathways. Statistical analysis utilized Mann–Whitney U, Chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests. Results showed only 6 students indicated family medicine as their first choice, compared to 49 GPs (p < 0.001). Students frequently perceived the field as “boring” (82 students vs. 1 GP, p < 0.001) and burdened by “trivial patient problems” (44 students vs. 7 GPs, p = 0.001), while GPs highlighted “stress” (15 GPs vs. 4 students, p < 0.001) as a primary disadvantage. Students scored significantly higher in the temperament dimensions of Novelty Seeking (p < 0.001) and Reward Dependence (p < 0.001). Addressing these educational misperceptions and urgently mitigating the structural drivers of occupational stress and workforce fatigue are critical public health priorities required to ensure the sustainability of primary care, maintain the continuity of preventive services, and safeguard equitable population health outcomes.