Monica Slavin

Dr. Monica Slavin


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2019 in Clinical Microbiology and Infection
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WJW. Jeong
W. Jeong
CKC. Keighley
C. Keighley
RWR. Wolfe
R. Wolfe
WLW.L. Lee
W.L. Lee
Monica SlavinMonica Slavin
Monica Slavin
SCSharon Chen
Sharon Chen

1 June 1995 in The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Monica SlavinMonica Slavin
Monica Slavin
BOBarbara Osborne
Barbara Osborne
RARobyn Adams
Robyn Adams
MLMarcia J. Levenstein
Marcia J. Levenstein
HSH. Gary Schoch
H. Gary Schoch
RBRaleigh A. Bowden
Raleigh A. Bowden
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed the efficacy and toxicity of 400 mg/day fluconazole in preventing fungal infections during the first 75 days after marrow transplantation. During prophylaxis, systemic fungal infections occurred in 10 (7%) of 152 fluconazole-treated patients compared with 26 (18%) of 148 placebo-treated patients (P = .004). There were no Candida albicans infections in fluconazole recipients compared with 18 in placebo recipients (P < .001) and no significant increase in Candida infections other than C. albicans. Fluconazole also significantly reduced the incidence of superficial fungal infections (P < .001), fungal colonization (P = .037), and empiric amphotericin B use (P = .005). The probability of survival was improved in fluconazole recipients, in whom 31 deaths occurred up to day 110 after transplantation compared with 52 deaths in placebo recipients (P = .004). No clinically significant toxicity was detected with fluconazole use. Prophylactic fluconazole was safe and significantly reduced systemic fungal infections with other benefits, including improved survival at day 110 after marrow transplantation.

20 January 2015 in Annals of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KMKieren A. Marr
Kieren A. Marr
HSHaran T. Schlamm
Haran T. Schlamm
RHRaoul Herbrecht
Raoul Herbrecht
SRScott T. Rottinghaus
Scott T. Rottinghaus
EBEric J. Bow
Eric J. Bow
JMJohan A. Maertens
Johan A. Maertens
This article has been corrected. The original version (PDF) is appended to this article as a Supplement. Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is associated with poor outcomes in patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs) and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Small studies suggest a role for combination antifungal therapy. To assess the safety and efficacy of voriconazole and anidulafungin compared with voriconazole monotherapy for treatment of IA. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00531479) 93 international sites. 454 patients with HM or HCT and suspected or documented IA were randomly assigned to treatment with voriconazole and anidulafungin or placebo. Primary analysis was done in the modified intention-to-treat population of 277 patients in whom IA was confirmed. The primary outcome was 6-week mortality; secondary outcomes included 12-week mortality, mortality in major subgroups, and safety measures. Mortality rates at 6 weeks were 19.3% (26 of 135) for combination therapy and 27.5% (39 of 142) for monotherapy (difference, −8.2 percentage points [95% CI, −19.0 to 1.5]; P = 0.087). Secondary mortality outcomes favored combination therapy. Multivariable regression analysis suggested that maximum galactomannan value, Karnofsky score, and baseline platelet count had prognostic significance. Most patients (218 of 277 [78.7%]) had IA diagnosis established by radiographic findings and maximum galactomannan positivity. In a post hoc analysis of this dominant subgroup, 6-week mortality was lower in combination therapy than monotherapy (15.7% [17 of 108] vs. 27.3% [30 of 110]; difference, −11.5 percentage points [CI, −22.7 to −0.4]; P = 0.037). Safety measures, including hepatotoxicity, were not different. Mortality at 6 weeks was higher than expected, and the difference in mortality was lower than expected, which reduced power to detect a treatment effect. Enrollment was restricted to patients with HM or HCT, which limited generalizability. Compared with voriconazole monotherapy, combination therapy with anidulafungin led to higher survival in subgroups of patients with IA. Limitations in power preclude definitive conclusions about superiority. Pfizer.

1 January 2011 in Drugs
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SCSharon C. -A. Chen
Sharon C. -A. Chen
Monica SlavinMonica Slavin
Monica Slavin
TSTania Christine Sorrell
Tania Christine Sorrell

1 May 2008 in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PTPeter Troke
Peter Troke
KAKoldo Aguirrebengoa
Koldo Aguirrebengoa
CACarmen Arteaga
Carmen Arteaga
DEDavid Ellis
David Ellis
CHChristopher H. Heath
Christopher H. Heath
SCSharon C. A. Chen
Sharon C. A. Chen
The efficacy of voriconazole in 107 patients with scedosporiosis was analyzed. Principal infection sites were the lungs/sinuses (24%), central nervous system (CNS) (20%), and bone (18%), while 21% of patients had disseminated infection. Solid organ transplantation (22%), hematological malignancy (21%), and surgery/trauma (15%) were the predominant underlying conditions. A successful therapeutic response was achieved in 57% of patients (median, 103 therapy days), with >98% of those responding receiving ≥28 days of therapy. Patients receiving primary therapy showed a 61% response versus 56% for the others. The best therapeutic responses were seen for skin/subcutaneous (91%) or bone (79%) infections, and the lowest for CNS infections (43%). Patients without major immune suppression (72%) or those with solid organ transplantation (63%) or various hematological conditions (60%) showed the best responses by underlying condition. Median known survival time was 133 days (therapy successes, 252 days; failures, 21 days). In all, 43 (40%) patients died, 73% due to scedosporiosis. Patients with Scedosporium prolificans infection had significantly reduced survival times ( P = 0.0259) and were more likely to die from fungal infection ( P = 0.002) than were Scedosporium apiospermum -infected patients. In a subset of 43 patients where voriconazole baseline MICs were available, response to voriconazole was higher for S. apiospermum -infected patients (54% response; MIC 50 , 0.25 μg/ml) than for S. prolificans -infected patients (40% response; MIC 50 , 4.0 μg/ml). Voriconazole demonstrated clinically useful activity in the treatment of both S. apiospermum and S. prolificans infections and was well tolerated.

1 August 2018 in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MJMaertens Johan
Maertens Johan
CGCorrado Girmenia
Corrado Girmenia
RBRoger J Brüggemann
Roger J Brüggemann
RDRafael F Duarte
Rafael F Duarte
CKChristopher C Kibbler
Christopher C Kibbler
E(European Conference On Infections In Leukaemia (Ecil)
European Conference On Infections In Leukaemia (Ecil)
The European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL) updated its guidelines on antifungal prophylaxis for adults using the grading system of IDSA. The guidelines were extended to provide recommendations for other haematological diseases besides AML and recipients of an allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Posaconazole remains the drug of choice when the incidence of invasive mould diseases exceeds 8%. For patients undergoing remission-induction chemotherapy for AML and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), fluconazole can still offer an alternative provided it forms part of an integrated care strategy that includes screening with biomarkers and imaging. Similarly, aerosolized liposomal amphotericin B combined with fluconazole can be considered for patients at high risk of invasive mould diseases but other formulations of the polyene are discouraged. Fluconazole is still recommended as primary prophylaxis for patients at low risk of invasive mould diseases during the pre-engraftment phase of allogeneic HSCT whereas only a moderate recommendation could be made for itraconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole for patients at high risk. Posaconazole is strongly recommended for preventing invasive mould disease post-engraftment but only when graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) was accompanied by other risk factors such as its severity, use of an alternative donor or when unresponsive to standard corticosteroid therapy. The need for primary prophylaxis for other patient groups was less clear and should be defined by the estimated risk of invasive fungal disease (IFD).