Paradoxical low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis (P-LFLG AS) is a high-risk yet incompletely understood subset of severe AS,
1 Hachicha Z. Dumesnil J.G. Bogaty P. Pibarot P. Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival.
Circulation. 2007; 115 : 2856-2864 Google Scholar
for which studies have not uniformly noted improved outcomes after aortic valve replacement.
2 Eleid M.F. Sorajja P. Michelena H.I. Malouf J.F. Scott C.G. Pellikka P.A. Flow-gradient patterns in severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.
Circulation. 2013; 128 : 1781-1789 Google Scholar
, 3 Mohty D. Magne J. Deltreuil M. Aboyans V. Echahidi N. Cassat C. et al. Outcome and impact of surgery in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a cardiac catheterization study.
Circulation. 2013; 128 : S235-S242 Google Scholar
Several vascular, valvular, and myocardial conditions contribute to low transvalvular flow (LF) across stenosed aortic valves.
4 Annabi M.S. Clisson M. Clavel M.A. Pibarot P. Workup and management of patients with paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018; 20 : 49 Google Scholar
The cumulative burden of LF conditions may affect hemodynamic improvement after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and explain the aforementioned varying survival benefits. In this cohort of P-LFLG AS patients who underwent TAVR, we assessed whether the cumulative burden of LF conditions present at the time of TAVR was associated with change in indexed stroke volume (SVi) post-TAVR.