Judy I-Chia Wu

Prof. Dr. Judy I-Chia Wu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 February 2023 in Chemical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gabriel MerinoGabriel Merino
Gabriel Merino
Miquel SolaMiquel Sola
Miquel Sola
Israel Fernández LópezIsrael Fernández López
Israel Fernández López
CFCina Foroutan-Nejad
Cina Foroutan-Nejad
PLPaolo Lazzeretti
Paolo Lazzeretti
ARAlbeiro Restrepo
Albeiro Restrepo
In this perspective, different expert opinions are gathered on the definition and concept of aromaticity.

16 May 2020 in WIREs Computational Molecular Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LKLucas J. Karas
Lucas J. Karas
CWChia‐Hua Wu
Chia‐Hua Wu
RDRanjita Das
Ranjita Das
JWJudy I-Chia Wu
Judy I-Chia Wu

14 April 2018 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MHMohamed I. Hashim
Mohamed I. Hashim
HLHa T. M. Le
Ha T. M. Le
TCTeng-Hao Chen
Teng-Hao Chen
YCYu-Sheng Chen
Yu-Sheng Chen
ODOlafs Daugulis
Olafs Daugulis
JWJudy I-Chia Wu
Judy I-Chia Wu

6 February 2020 in ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PNPham Quoc Nhien
Pham Quoc Nhien
WCWei-Lun Chou
Wei-Lun Chou
TCTu Thi Kim Cuc
Tu Thi Kim Cuc
TKTrang Manh Khang
Trang Manh Khang
CWChia-Hua Wu
Chia-Hua Wu
HLHong-Cheu Lin
Hong-Cheu Lin

25 September 2019 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CWChia-Hua Wu
Chia-Hua Wu
LKLucas José Karas
Lucas José Karas
HOHenrik Ottosson
Henrik Ottosson
JWJudy I-Chia Wu
Judy I-Chia Wu
Baird’s rule explains why and when excited-state proton transfer (ESPT) reactions happen in organic compounds. Bifunctional compounds that are [4n + 2] π-aromatic in the ground state, become [4n + 2] π-antiaromatic in the first 1ππ* states, and proton transfer (either inter- or intramolecularly) helps relieve excited-state antiaromaticity. Computed nucleus-independent chemical shifts (NICS) for several ESPT examples (including excited-state intramolecular proton transfers (ESIPT), biprotonic transfers, dynamic catalyzed transfers, and proton relay transfers) document the important role of excited-state antiaromaticity. o-Salicylic acid undergoes ESPT only in the “antiaromatic” S1 (1ππ*) state, but not in the “aromatic” S2 (1ππ*) state. Stokes’ shifts of structurally related compounds [e.g., derivatives of 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)benzoxazole and hydrogen-bonded complexes of 2-aminopyridine with protic substrates] vary depending on the antiaromaticity of the photoinduced tautomers. Remarkably, Baird’s rule predicts the effect of light on hydrogen bond strengths; hydrogen bonds that enhance (and reduce) excited-state antiaromaticity in compounds become weakened (and strengthened) upon photoexcitation. Significance Excited-state proton transfer (ESPT) is universally recognized as a reaction that relaxes the energy of a photoexcited organic compound. It is commonly found in many light-driven processes. Here we identify decisive principles underlying why and when ESPT happens. Our computational investigation of prototypical ESPT reactions finds that the occurrence of ESPT can be explained by an electron-counting rule—Baird’s rule, which remains largely ignored despite having a near–50-y-old history. We emphasize that this surprising connection not only explains the mechanistic principle of ESPT reactions, but it also predicts whether hydrogen bonding interactions that form within and between organic compounds might strengthen or weaken when irradiated by light. Recognizing this relationship has tremendous interpretive merit for organic photochemistry.

31 May 2013 in Organic Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Israel Fernández LópezIsrael Fernández López
Israel Fernández López
JWJudy I-Chia Wu
Judy I-Chia Wu
PSPaul von Ragué Schleyer
Paul von Ragué Schleyer