Maintaining a balanced redox state within cells is crucial for the sustenance of life. The process involves continuous cytosolic disulfide reduction reactions to restore oxidized proteins to their reduced thiol forms. There are two main cellular antioxidant pathways—the thioredoxin (Trx) and glutathione (GSH)/glutaredoxin (Grx) systems. In the GSH/Grx system, glutathione reductase (GR; GSR) catalyses the reduction of GSH disulfide (GSSG) to its sulfhydryl form (GSH), which can then further reduce oxidized Grxs. GR is an essential enzyme that helps in maintaining the supply of reduced glutathione-GSH, which is a significant reducing thiol found in most cells and known for its antioxidant properties. Therefore, it can have a significant impact on cancer development. To investigate this further, we performed an immunohistochemical analysis of GR protein expression in colon adenocarcinoma samples collected from patients with primary colon adenocarcinoma (stage I and II) and patients with metastasis to regional lymph nodes (stage III). The results of our study revealed a significant relationship between the immunohistochemical expression of GR and tumour histological grade, depth of invasion, regional lymph node involvement, staging, and PCNA immunohistochemical expression. It was found that 95% of patients with stage I had low levels of GR expression, whereas 89% of patients with stage III had high levels of immunohistochemical expression. A high level of expression was also detected in the patients with stage II of the disease, where almost 63% were characterized by a high expression of GR. The Western blot method revealed that the highest level of expression was found in the LS 174T cell line, which corresponds to stage II. The results of our study indicate that the immunohistochemical expression of GR may act as an independent prognostic factor associated with colon adenocarcinoma patients’ prognosis.

Glutathione peroxidase 2 (Gpx-2) is a selenoenzyme with antioxidant capabilities that may play a role in cancer development. Hence, we investigated the immunohistochemical expression of Gpx-2 protein in colon adenocarcinoma samples derived from patients with colon adenocarcinoma who did not receive any form of treatment prior to the surgical procedure. The associations between the immunohistochemical expression of Gpx-2 and clinical parameters were analysed using the Chi² test and Fisher’s exact test. A Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to verify the relationship between the intensity of Gpx-2 expression and the 5-year survival rate of patients. In total, 101 (80.80%) samples had strong Gpx-2 protein expression and 24 (19.20%) samples were characterized with low expression. The high expression of Gpx-2 was correlated with the histological grade of the tumour (p < 0.001), PCNA immunohistochemical expression (p < 0.001), depth of invasion (p = 0.001) and angioinvasion (p < 0.001). We can conclude that high expression of Gpx-2 is correlated with reduced survival of colon adenocarcinoma patients (log-rank, p < 0.001).

Glutaredoxin 2 (Grx2; Glrx2) is a glutathione-dependent oxidoreductase located in mitochondria, which is central to the regulation of glutathione homeostasis and mitochondrial redox, and plays a crucial role in highly metabolic tissues. In response to mitochondrial redox signals and oxidative stress, Grx2 can catalyze the oxidation and S-glutathionylation of membrane-bound thiol proteins in mitochondria. Therefore, it can have a significant impact on cancer development. To investigate this further, we performed an immunohistochemical analysis of Grx2 protein expression in colon adenocarcinoma samples collected from patients with primary colon adenocarcinoma (stage I and II) and patients with metastasis to regional lymph nodes (stage III). The results of our study revealed a significant relationship between the immunohistochemical expression of Grx2 and tumor histological grade, depth of invasion, regional lymph node involvement, angioinvasion, staging, and PCNA immunohistochemical expression. It was found that 87% of patients with stage I had high levels of Grx2 expression. In contrast, only 33% of patients with stage II and 1% of patients with stage III had high levels of Grx2 expression. Moreover, the multivariate analysis revealed that the immunohistochemical expression of Grx2 protein apart from the grade of tumor differentiation was an independent prognostic factors for the survival of patients with colon adenocarcinoma. Studies analyzing Grx2 levels in patients’ blood confirmed that the highest levels of serum Grx2 protein was also found in stage I patients, which was reflected in the survival curves. A higher level of Grx2 in the serum has been associated with a more favorable outcome. These results were supported by in vitro analysis conducted on colorectal cancer cell lines that corresponded to stages I, II, and III of colorectal cancer, using qRT-PCR and Western Blot.

(1) Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in terms of incidence and mortality. Approximately 90% of all colorectal cancer cases are adenocarcinomas, originating from epithelial cells of the colorectal mucosa. Upregulated gene 4 (URG4) is an oncogene involved in cancer development. The aim of the study was to assess the immunohistochemical expression of URG4 protein expression in Polish patients with colon adenocarcinoma who were not treated with any therapy before radical surgery. (2) Methods: The study used colon tissue samples taken from people with a confirmed diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma after a thorough histopathological examination. The associations between the immunohistochemical expression of URG4 and clinical parameters were analyzed by the Chi2 test or Chi2Yatesa test. The study conducted an analysis of the correlation between the expression of URG4 and the five-year survival rate of patients through the application of the Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank statistical test. The intracellular localization of URG4 was identified through the utilization of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) methodology. (3) Results: In univariate Cox regression analyses, immuno-histochemical expression of URG4, grade of histological differentiation, depth of invasion, angioinvasion, PCNA expression, stage of disease and lymph node involvement were found to be significant prognostic factors. Within our patient cohort, it was observed that the degree of tumour differentiation and URG4 expression were found to be distinct prognostic factors in regard to the 5-year survival rates of those with colon adenocarcinoma. (4) Conclusions: High immunohistochemical expression of URG4 correlates with poor prognosis in patients with colon adenocarcinoma.

Several studies revealed that expression levels of glutathione peroxidase 1 (Gpx-1) can be associated with cancer development, mainly through its role in hydroperoxide scavenging by regulating intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. Therefore, our aim was to investigate the expression of Gpx-1 protein in a population of Polish patients with colon adenocarcinoma in the absence of any therapy prior to radical surgery. The study was carried out using colon tissue from patients with adenocarcinoma of the colon confirmed by histopathological examination. Gpx-1 antibody was used to determine the immunohistochemical expression of Gpx-1. The Chi²test or Chi²_Yatesa test were used to analyse the associations between the immunohistochemical expression of Gpx-1 and clinical parameters. The relationship between Gpx-1 expression, and 5-year patient survival was examined using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test. Intracellular localisation of Gpx-1 was detected by the use of transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Western blot analysis was used for the evaluation of Gpx-1 protein expression levels in cancer cell lines in vitro. Immunohistochemical study revealed that the high expression of Gpx-1 was associated with the tumour’s histological grade, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemical expression, depth of invasion, and angioinvasion (all p < 0.001) (4). The high immunohistochemical expression of Gpx-1 is correlated with poor prognosis of colon adenocarcinoma patients.

Background: The socket preservation technique involves filling the bone defect created after tooth extraction with a bone substitute material. This helps to reduce bone resorption of the post-extraction alveolar ridge. Various types of bone substitute biomaterials are used as augmentation materials, including autogeneic, allogeneic, and xenogeneic materials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in alveolar ridge dimensions and alterations of optical bone density in sockets grafted with two different biomaterials. Additionally, bone biopsies taken from the grafted sites underwent histological evaluation. Methods: This study enrolled 10 generally healthy patients, who were divided into two equal groups. Patients in the first group were treated with an allogeneic material (BIOBank^®, Biobank, Paris, France), while patients in the second group were treated with an xenogeneic material (Geistlich Bio-Oss^®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland). Tooth extraction was performed, following which the appropriate material was placed into the debrided socket. The material was secured with a collagen membrane (Geistlich Bio-Gide^®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland) and sutures, which were removed 7 to 10 days after the procedure. Micro-CBCT examinations were performed, for the evaluation of alveolar ridge dimensions and bone optical density, at 7–10 days and six months after the procedure. Bone trepanbiopsy was performed simultaneously to the implant placement, six months after socket preservation. The retrieved biopsy was subjected to histological examination via hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Masson’s trichrome staining. Results: The results showed that the allogeneic material was more effective in preserving alveolar buccal height and was probably more rapidly transformed into the patient’s own bone. Sockets grafted with the xenogeneic material presented higher optical bone density after six months. Both materials presented similar effectiveness in alveolar width preservation. Conclusions: Based on the outcomes of this study, it can be concluded that both materials are suitable for the socket preservation technique. However, the dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge and the quality of the newly formed bone may vary depending on the type of biomaterial used.