Background: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) has been used for the treatment of chronic lumbar radicular pain and other chronic pain states. The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) consists of primary afferent somatic and visceral nerve cell bodies that transduce sensory signals from the periphery to the central part of the nervous system. It is a very important part of acute nociception, as well as the development and maintenance of chronic pain. Methods: A total of seven domestic pigs were investigated. All pigs underwent a PRF procedure while under general anesthesia and with X-ray imaging. Four lumbar DRGs were randomly treated. We used the opposite side of the DRGs as controls. The lumbar region of the spine was placed in 10% formaldehyde for one month. After this fixation, DRG samples were prepared for slide analysis. Results: Nestin (Nes, code-Nr. AB 5968, dilution 1:250, rabbit, Abcam, United Kingdom) and matrix metallopeptidase 2 (MMP-2, code-Nr. DUB 03, dilution 1:100, goat) expressions were detected by immunohistochemical staining. The cell numbers with Nes (28.4 ± 3.3 vs. 16.1 ± 3.4; P < 0.05) and MMP-2 (26.2 ± 3.2 vs. 14.1 ± 2.3; P < 0.05) expressions were larger on the PRF side compared to the control side. The glial cells in the spinal ganglia on both sides showed immunoreactivity. Conclusions: The increase of MMP-2-containing gangliocytes one month after PRF procedures highlights active neural cell proliferation. Increased Nes factor expression in spinal gangliocytes of the lumbar region indicates neural remodeling and regeneration.

Background: Transcutaneous Randomized Pulsed Radiofrequency (TCPRF-STP) is a non-invasive therapeutic approach increasingly explored for managing spine-related pain, particularly in cases involving disc herniations and degenerative spine conditions. Objectives: To evaluate the use of transcutaneous PRF-STP in the treatment of spine pathologies and its evolution in short-term follow-up. Methods: This case series examines the outcomes of three patients treated with TCPRF-STP for varying spine pathologies, including lumbar and cervical disc herniations, lumbar stenosis, and radiculopathy. All patients had previously undergone conventional conservative therapies without a satisfactory improvement and were unwilling or unable to undergo invasive procedures. The treatment involved the application of electromagnetic fields through adhesive skin patches at targeted sites. Patients underwent three sessions of TCPRF-STP, with follow-up assessments evaluating pain and MRI. Results: Transcutaneous PRF-STP showed notable reductions in pain (VAS 0 in most cases), improvements in movement, and the restoration of normal daily activities. Follow-up MRI scans demonstrated positive structural changes in the treated discs. Although long-term recurrence occurred in one case, the patient remained active without functional limitations. Conclusions: Transcutaneous PRF-STP offers a promising, minimally invasive alternative for patients seeking to avoid surgery, though further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are necessary to establish more robust evidence of its efficacy. This technique could become an important adjunct in managing chronic spinal pain conditions, offering patients an option with minimal risk and hospital demands.

Transcutaneous Randomized Pulsed Radiofrequency (PRF-STP) is a non-invasive therapeutic approach increasingly explored for managing spine-related pain, particularly in cases involving disc herniations and degenerative spine conditions. This case series examines the outcomes of four patients treated with PRF-STP for varying spine pathologies, including lumbar and cervical disc herniations, lumbar stenosis, and radiculopathy. All patients had previously undergone conventional conservative therapies without satisfactory improvement and were unwilling or unable to undergo invasive procedures. Treatment involved the application of electromagnetic fields through adhesive skin patches at targeted sites, providing pain relief and functional improvement. Patients underwent three sessions of PRF-STP, with follow-up assessments showing significant reductions in pain (VAS 0 in most cases), improvement in movement, and restoration of normal daily activities. Follow-up MRI scans demonstrated positive structural changes in the treated discs. Although long-term recurrence occurred in one case, the patient remained active without functional limitations. PRF-STP offers a promising, minimally invasive alternative for patients seeking to avoid surgery, though further studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are necessary to establish more robust evidence of its efficacy. This technique could become an important adjunct in managing chronic spinal pain conditions, offering patients an option with minimal risk and hospital demands.