The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at baseline treatment is an important marker of systemic inflammation, which is correlated with survival benefits in lung, breast, ovarian, bladder, and colorectal cancer. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a biomarker with discording results regarding survival benefits in lung cancer. In our research, we studied the relationship between these two markers in patients with lung cancer. Patients with stage I, II, III, and IV lung cancer (n = 80) were included in this retrospective study. The NLR baseline was recorded before the initiation of treatment. The NLR cut-off value was 4. PD-L1 expression was determined by immunohistochemical staining. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted to test their prognostic value. NLR proved to be a significant prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.002, Log Rank) with a mean PFS of 27.7 months for low NLR patients and 12.8 months for high NLR patients. It was also significant for overall survival (OS) (p=0.007, Log Rank) with a mean OS of 52 months for low NLR patients and 41.6 months for high NLR patients. The prognostic impact of PD-L1 expression on PFS and OS was not statistically significant with a mean PFS of 23.1 months for PD-L1-negative patients and 15.8 months for PD-L1-positive patients (p=0.422, Log Rank). Mean OS was 49 months for PD-L1-negative patients while for PD-L1-positive patients, it was 43.3 months (p=0.550 Log Rank). Regarding the correlation between PD-L1 expression and NLR value, PFS mean survival times were 13.1 months for PD-L1(+)/NLR>4, 15.1 months for PD-L1(-)/NLR>4, 16.4 months for PD-L1(+)/NLR<4 and 27.8 months for PD-L1(-)/NLR<4. This correlation between PFS and the combined PD-L1 and NLR prognostic factor was statistically relevant (p=0.04). For OS, the PD-L1/NLR combined prognostic factor was not statistically relevant (p=0.055). A mean PFS time of 27.8 months was reported for PD-L1(-)/NLR<4 group patients while for the other groups, the mean PFS was 14.9 months (p=0.045). In univariate analysis, the elevated NLR was significantly associated with a decreased PFS time (HR=2.31, 95% CI =1.323- 4.051, p=0.03) as well as OS (HR=3.555, 95% CI=1.310- 9.652, p=0.013). In multivariate analysis, NLR remained statistically significant for PFS (HR=2.160, 95% CI=1.148- 4.062, p=0.013) and OS (HR=4.364, 95% CI=1.474- 12.921, p=0.008) after adjusting for the factors of age, gender, tumor stage, lymph node stage, clinical stage, histology, and PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was not a valid prognostic factor for progression or death in either univariate or multivariate analysis. We also stratified the disease control rate (DCR) depending on PD-L1/NLR combined factor expression. In the PD-L1(-)/NLR<4 group, we had the highest number of partial responses (PRs) and only one complete response (CR) compared to the other groups (p=0.006). As the number of patients is limited in the present analysis, it is hypothesized that these two markers can be useful in dividing patients into two prognostic groups: the good prognostic group reunites PD-L1(+)/NLR<4 and PD-L1(-)/NLR4 and PD-L1(-)/NLR>4.

Background: Multiple primary malignant tumors (MPMTs) involving the digestive tract pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with survival differences between synchronous and metachronous forms not well defined. This study assessed predictors of overall survival (OS) in patients in whom at least one tumor originated in the digestive tract or accessory organs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1920 oncology cases (January 2020–June 2023) from St. Nicholas Hospital, Romania. Of 118 patients with MPMTs, 45 had ≥1 digestive tract tumor. They were classified as synchronous (2 months) as per the SEER rules. Clinical, pathological, treatment, and follow-up data were analyzed; OS was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression. Results: Fifteen patients (33%) had synchronous tumors and 30 (67%) had metachronous tumors. Overall, 17 of 45 patients (37.8%) died by the last follow-up. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) was 31.3 months for those with synchronous vs. 68.3 months for those with metachronous tumors (HR = 2.49, 95% CI 0.95–6.50, p = 0.062; log-rank p = 0.053). Curative treatment of the first tumor was associated with markedly improved survival (RMST 58.2 vs. 29.4 months; HR = 20.5, 95% CI 3.68–114, p < 0.001). In the multivariable Cox regression analysis, advanced primary nodal stage (N2–N3) remained independently associated with reduced survival (adjusted HR 3.86, 95% CI 1.04–14.3, p = 0.044). The adjusted effect of synchronous vs. metachronous classification was attenuated (adjusted HR 2.22, 95% CI 0.84–5.86, p = 0.10). Conclusions: In this single-center, hypothesis-generating cohort, synchronous digestive-tract MPMTs were associated with shorter unadjusted survival than metachronous tumors, but advanced nodal stage and limited feasibility of curative therapy were the dominant independent predictors of poor outcome. Given the small sample size and retrospective design, these findings should be interpreted as preliminary and warrant validation in larger, multicenter cohorts.

Background: Lung cancer (LC) is the first and most lethal cancer in the world; identifying new methods to treat it, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), is needed. ICIs treatment is very effective, but it comes bundled with a series of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Restricted mean survival time (RMST) is an alternative tool for assessing the patients’ survival when the proportional hazard assumption (PH) fails. Methods: We included in this analytical cross-sectional observational survey patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated for at least 6 months with ICIs in the first- and second-line settings. Using RMST, we estimated the overall survival (OS) of patients by dividing them into two groups. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of the prognostic factors on OS. Results: Seventy-nine patients were included (68.4% men, mean age 63.8), and 34/79 (43%) presented irAEs. The OS RMST of the entire group was 30.91 months, with a survival median of 22 months. Thirty-two out of seventy-nine (40.5%) died before we ended our study. The OS RMST and death percentage favored the patients who presented irAEs (long-rank test, p = 0.036). The OS RMST of patients with irAEs was 35.7 months, with a number of deaths of 12/34 (35.29%), while the OS RMST of the patients without irAEs was 17 months, with a number of deaths of 20/45 (44.44%). The OS RMST by the line of treatment favored the first line of treatment. In this group, the presence of irAEs significantly impacted the survival of these patients (p = 0.0083). Moreover, patients that experienced low-grade irAEs had a better OS RMST. This result has to be cautiously regarded because of the small number of patients stratified according to the grades of irAEs. The prognostic factors for the survival were: the presence of irAEs, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and the number of organs affected by metastasis. The risk of dying was 2.13 times higher for patients without irAEs than for the patients who presented irAEs, (CI) 95% of 1.03 to 4.39. Moreover, by increasing the ECOG performance status by one point, the risk of death increased by 2.28 times, with a CI 95% of 1.46 to 3.58, while the involvement of more metastatic organs was associated with a 1.60 times increase in the death risk, with a CI 95% of 1.09 to 2.36. Age and the type of tumor were not predictive for this analysis. Conclusions: The RMST is a new tool that helps researchers to better address the survival in studies with ICIs treatment where the PH fails, and the long-rank test is less efficient due to the existence of the long-term responses and delayed treatment effects. Patients with irAEs have a better prognosis than those without irAEs in the first-line settings. The ECOG performance status and the number of organs affected by metastasis must be considered when selecting patients for ICIs treatment.

Background: Triple primary malignant tumors (TPMTs) are extremely rare and represent a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Their frequency has increased with advances in cancer detection and longer patient survival. Case presentation: We report the case of a 76-year-old male diagnosed with three synchronous primary malignancies involving the liver, left kidney, and right lung. Imaging revealed a hepatic mass with arterial enhancement and portal washout, a large left renal mass, and a cavitated pulmonary nodule. Histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation confirmed three distinct tumors: well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and invasive non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma. A multidisciplinary oncology board recommended surgical resection of the liver and kidney lesions and stereotactic body radiotherapy for the lung tumor. The patient underwent hepatectomy and nephrectomy but experienced severe postoperative complications leading to multi-organ failure and death. Results of the systematic review: A systematic search identified 83 relevant cases of triple primary malignancies after full-text eligibility assessment. None of the 159 articles included after primary screening described a synchronous association of primary liver, kidney, and lung cancers. Conclusions: This case highlights the importance of thorough diagnostic assessment and individualized, multidisciplinary management in patients with multiple synchronous malignancies. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and lung adenocarcinoma.