As global energy production progressively turns toward a green environment and economy, one of the safety challenges to the maritime industry that has arisen lies within offshore wind farms (OWFs). As renewable sources of energy whose numbers are rapidly expanding, their impact to the safety of navigation of the ships that navigate in their vicinity ought to be examined further. An ever-growing number of OWFs has led to safety concerns that have never been taken into consideration before. This article gives a structured quantitative analysis and an in-depth review of the literature connected to the safety of navigation, collision probability, and risk assessment that OWFs pose to all maritime industry agents. In this article, the main concerns of the impact of OWFs to the safety of navigation are analyzed using a combination of both the PRISMA and PICOC methodologies. Various types of scientific papers such as journal articles, conference proceedings, MSc theses, PhD theses, and online works of research are collated into a detailed bibliometric analysis and categorized by the most relevant parameters providing valuable perspectives on the current state of art in the field. The findings of this research emphasize the need for a further and more thorough analysis on the theoretical installment of OWFs and their inevitable impact on increasing maritime traffic complexity. The results of this article can form a strong basis for further scientific development in the field and can give useful insights to all maritime industry stakeholders dealing with OWFs.

Shipping in complex marine environments requires a balance between navigational safety, minimising travel time and optimising logistics management, which is particularly challenging in areas with geometric obstructions and Offshore Wind Farms (OWFs). This study focuses on the maritime route networks in the Croatian ports of Pula and Rijeka, including the main access routes to OWFs and zones characterised by multiple navigational challenges. The aim of the research is to develop an empirically based and practically applicable framework for the optimisation of sea routes that combines analytical precision with operational efficiency. The parallel application of Dijkstra and A* algorithms enables a comparative analysis between deterministic and heuristic approaches in terms of reducing navigation risk, optimising route costs and ensuring fast logistical access to OWFs. The applied methods include the analysis of real and simulated route networks, the evaluation of statistical route parameters and the visualisation of the results for the evaluation of logistical and operational efficiency. Adaptive heuristic modifications of the A* algorithm, combined with the parallel implementation of Dijkstra’s algorithm, enable dynamic route planning that takes into account real-world conditions, including variations in wind speed and direction. The results obtained provide a comprehensive framework for safe, efficient and logistically optimised navigation in complex marine environments, with direct applications in the maintenance, inspection and operational management of OWFs.

This literature review provides a structured quantitative analysis of existing research on the application of machine learning models (MLMs) and multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) in the context of port state control (PSC). The aim of the study is to capture current research trends, identify thematic priorities, and demonstrate how these analytical tools have been used to support decision-making and risk assessment in the maritime domain. Rather than evaluating the effectiveness of individual models, the study focuses on the distribution and frequency of their use and provides insights into the development of methodological approaches in this area. Although several studies suggest that the integration of MLMs and MCDM techniques can improve the objectivity and efficiency of PSC inspections, this report does not provide a comparative assessment of their performance. Instead, it lays the groundwork for future qualitative studies that will assess the practical benefits and challenges of such integration. The findings suggest a fragmented but growing research interest in data-driven approaches to PSC and highlight the potential of advanced analytics to support maritime safety and regulatory compliance.

Maritime traffic complexity (MTC) is a term that has gained increased importance in the last decade in the maritime safety domain. It is a concept for understanding navigational safety and operational challenges in congested maritime environments. Although research interest in MTC has grown, it is a concept that remains fragmented, with various interpretations of definitions, indicators, and modeling approaches present in the literature. This study presents a comprehensive literature review and bibliometric analysis to synthesize the current state of research on MTC as a scientific construct and clarify its conceptual foundations from an analytical perspective. In accordance with PRISMA guidelines and systematic literature review (SLR) methodology, relevant studies were identified and screened across major scientific databases. A detailed analysis was conducted on 40 scientific publications. The findings indicate that most existing MTC models rely mainly on Automatic Identification System (AIS) data and corresponding derived metrics. MTC is primarily assessed through geometric vessel–vessel interactions, relative motion parameters, and collision-risk indicators. Bibliometric analysis demonstrates a rapid increase in scientific interest in this topic since 2015, with research concentrated in several leading journals. The study identifies a significant methodological limitation in current frameworks, which often overlook the heterogeneity of marine traffic, environmental conditions, vessel reliability, and human factors. Therefore, this study highlights the need for a more comprehensive MTC evaluation framework that incorporates operational, geographical constraint-based, environmental, and behavioral variables alongside traditional AIS-based metrics.

Maritime communication systems are among the most important infrastructure of global maritime safety and security. They consist of very high frequency (VHF) radio, the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS), contemporary satellite nets, Automatic Identification System (AIS) networks, and the emerging VHF Data Exchange System (VDES). These systems are essential for distress signaling, navigational coordination, and vessel traffic management. As maritime operations are experiencing accelerated digitalisation, the safety and security dimensions of maritime communication systems have attracted substantial and growing scientific attention. This study presents a comprehensive literature review and bibliometric analysis of the safety and security of maritime communication systems. Guided by the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology, a structured search was conducted across three major scientific databases: Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and IEEE Xplore. Starting from a raw pool of 6648 records retrieved between 2000 and 2026, the dataset was reduced through successive filtering to a final body of 68 high-relevance publications. Bibliometric analysis reveals a significant upward publication trend from 2015 onwards, with a marked acceleration after 2019. Thematic analysis identifies seven principal research clusters: GMDSS modernisation, AIS safety and security, VDES and VHF next-generation systems, maritime cybersecurity, satellite communications, risk assessment frameworks, and emerging technologies, including artificial intelligence and autonomous vessel communications. The review identifies significant research gaps, including the absence of integrated cross-system risk frameworks, insufficient attention to human factors in cybersecurity, limited studies addressing emerging regulatory, legal governance components and a brief analysis of the maritime communications market. This study provides a structured foundation for future research and policy development in maritime communication security.

Elevated string-rail systems, in which unmanned electric vehicles run on steel wheels along a prestressed rail carried on slender supports, have been proposed as a way of moving containers between a quay and an inland terminal without using the road network. Their developers claim gains in ship handling speed, terminal land use and emissions at the same time, but none of these claims has been tested against measured port performance. This study assesses such a link at eight European container ports handling between 0.4 and 14.2 million TEU. The assessment combines two distinct components: a discrete-event simulation of the quay interface, calibrated against the Container Port Performance Index to within 1.5% of reported ship time at berth, and separate analytical calculations of required yard area, emissions and cost. The simulation covers the crane and horizontal-transport interface only; stacking, retrieval, reshuffling and yard-crane operations are outside its boundary. Internal model behaviour is benchmarked against independently published terminal operating figures, and the logic, inputs and scenario behaviour of the model were assessed by four specialists in container terminal operations. Because no published source gives the energy use of the vehicle, it is derived from physics, specifically from rolling and aerodynamic resistance, as 0.482 kWh per TEU-km. On an analytical capacity calculation, removing half of the road-borne inland volume would reduce required stacking area by 7.7 to 31.6%, equivalent to between 4.2 and 108.6 hectares of terminal area under a stated proportionality assumption, and a conditional comparison of emission factors gives a reduction of 60 to 97% on the diverted traffic alone. Avoided road haulage gives a positive annual balance at seven of the eight ports, with simple payback of 3.5 to 5 years at the five largest diverted flows. The benefit depends on how much of a port’s traffic actually leaves by road: gateway ports with heavy road use gain most, while a transhipment hub such as Piraeus gains least despite its size. Ship handling improves by at most 3.8%, well below the 5 to 10% claimed, and the improvement comes from avoiding the drive across the yard rather than from a faster crane cycle. Measured against the price of carbon, the investment is poor value, but measured against the cost of road haulage, it is not, which suggests such links should be planned as land and traffic infrastructure rather than as an emissions measure.