Purpose Little evidence of increased thrombotic risk is available in COVID-19 patients. Our purpose was to assess thrombotic risk in severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods All patients referred to 4 intensive care units (ICUs) from two centers of a French tertiary hospital for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 between March 3rd and 31st 2020 were included. Medical history, symptoms, biological data and imaging were prospectively collected. Propensity score matching was performed to analyze the occurrence of thromboembolic events between non-COVID-19 ARDS and COVID-19 ARDS patients. Results 150 COVID-19 patients were included (122 men, median age 63 [53; 71] years, SAPSII 49 [37; 64] points). Sixty-four clinically relevant thrombotic complications were diagnosed in 150 patients, mainly pulmonary embolisms (16.7%). 28/29 patients (96.6%) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy experienced circuit clotting. Three thrombotic occlusions (in 2 patients) of centrifugal pump occurred in 12 patients (8%) supported by ECMO. Most patients (> 95%) had elevated D-dimer and fibrinogen. No patient developed disseminated intravascular coagulation. Von Willebrand (vWF) activity, vWF antigen and FVIII were considerably increased, and 50/57 tested patients (87.7%) had positive lupus anticoagulant. Comparison with non-COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 145) confirmed that COVID-19 ARDS patients (n = 77) developed significantly more thrombotic complications, mainly pulmonary embolisms (11.7 vs. 2.1%, p < 0.008). Coagulation parameters significantly differed between the two groups. Conclusion Despite anticoagulation, a high number of patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19 developed life-threatening thrombotic complications. Higher anticoagulation targets than in usual critically ill patients should therefore probably be suggested.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted healthcare communities across the globe on an unprecedented scale. Patients have had diverse clinical outcomes, but those developing COVID-19-related coagulopathy have shown a disproportionately worse outcome. This narrative review summarizes current evidence regarding the epidemiology, clinical features, known and presumed pathophysiology-based models, and treatment guidance regarding COVID-19 coagulopathy.

Background and Objective: Host defence mechanisms to counter virus infection include the activation of the broncho-alveolar haemostasis. Fibrin degradation products secondary to extravascular fibrin breakdown could contribute to the marked increase in D-Dimers during COVID-19. We sought to examine the prognostic value on lung injury of D-Dimers in non-critically ill COVID-19 patients without thrombotic events. Methods: This study retrospectively analysed hospitalized COVID-19 patients classified according to a D-Dimers threshold following the COVID-19 associated haemostatic abnormalities (CAHA) classification at baseline and at peak (Stage 1: D-Dimers less than three-fold above normal; Stage 2: D-Dimers three- to six-fold above normal; Stage 3: D-Dimers six-fold above normal). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of critical lung injuries on chest computed tomography. The secondary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death or transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). Results: Among the 123 patients included, critical lung injuries were evidenced in 8 (11.9%) patients in Stage 1, 6 (20%) in Stage 2 and 15 (57.7%) in Stage 3 (p = 0.001). D-Dimers staging at peak was an independent predictor of critical lung injuries regardless of the inflammatory burden assessed by CRP levels (OR 2.70, 95% CI (1.50–4.86); p < 0.001) and was significantly associated with increased in-hospital death or ICU transfer (14.9 % in Stage 1, 50.0% in Stage 2 and 57.7% in Stage 3 (p < 0.001)). D-Dimers staging at peak was an independent predictor of in-hospital death or ICU transfer (OR 2.50, CI 95% (1.27–4.93); p = 0.008). Conclusions: In the absence of overt thrombotic events, D-Dimers quantification is a relevant marker of critical lung injuries and dismal patient outcome.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) (also termed thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome or vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia or vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia) is characterized by (i) venous or arterial thrombosis; (ii) mild-to-severe thrombocytopenia; (iii) positive antiplatelet factor 4 (PF4)–polyanion antibodies or anti-PF4–heparin antibodies detected by the HIT (heparin-induced thrombocytopenia) ELISA; (iv) occurring 5–30 days after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) or Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen) vaccination. VITT’s incidence is 1 per 100 000 vaccinated people irrespective of age and up to 1 in 50 000 for people <50 years of age with the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. The exact mechanism by which adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines trigger this syndrome is still unclear, as for the increased risk for acute cerebral sinus venous thrombosis and splanchnic vein thrombosis as compared to other locations of venous thrombotic events. VITT is associated with the detection of anti-PF4 antibodies, unrelated to previous use of heparin therapy. PF4 antibodies are thought to activate platelets via the platelet FcγRIIA receptors leading to further platelet activation that causes thrombosis and thrombocytopenia.

Acute promyelocytic leukaemia and COVID‐19 are two conditions associated with severe coagulopathy. We present here the multiple haemostasis abnormalities observed in a patient with concomitant acute promyelocytic leukaemia and COVID‐19. The clinical consequences were dramatic and led to the death of the patient. A 62‐year old woman was admitted on April 13, 2020 for unexplained asthenia, dyspnoea, and uncontrolled epistaxis. Clinical examination revealed pallor, left periorbital ecchymosis due to a recent fall, intrabuccal haemorrhagic bullae, persistent epistaxis, and mild splenomegaly. Oxygen saturation was 96%. Chest computed tomography (CT) was consistent with moderate COVID‐19 pneumonia (9 points on a 0‐25 scale)(Pan, et al 2020). The qRT‐PCR of a nasopharyngeal swab was positive for SARS‐CoV2.