Javier López-Díaz

Dr. Javier López-Díaz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 December 2012 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LNLuis Nombela-Franco
Luis Nombela-Franco
JWJohn G. Webb
John G. Webb
PJPeter P. de Jaegere
Peter P. de Jaegere
STStefan Toggweiler
Stefan Toggweiler
RNRutger-Jan Nuis
Rutger-Jan Nuis
JRJosep Rodés-Cabau
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Background—: The objective of this study was to evaluate the timing, predictive factors, and prognostic value of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods and Results—: The study included 1061 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable (64%) or self-expandable (36%) valve. CVEs were classified as acute (≤24 hours), subacute (1–30 days), or late (>30 days). CVEs occurred in 54 patients (5.1%; stroke, 4.2%) within 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (acute in 54% of cases). The predictors of acute CVEs were balloon postdilation of the valve prosthesis (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval,1.07–5.67) and valve dislodgment/embolization (odds ratio, 4.36; 95% CI, 1.21–15.69); new-onset atrial fibrillation (odds ratio, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.11–6.83) was a predictor of subacute CVEs. Late CVEs occurred in 35 patients (3.3%; stroke, 2.1%) at a median follow-up of 12 months (3–23 months). The predictors of late CVEs were chronic atrial fibrillation (2.84; 95% CI, 1.46–5.53), peripheral vascular disease (hazard ratio, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.02–3.97), and prior cerebrovascular disease (hazard ratio, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.01–4.15). Major stroke was associated with 30-day (odds ratio, 7.43; 95% CI, 2.45–22.53) and late (hazard ratio, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.01–3.04) mortality. Conclusions—: In a large cohort of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, the rates of acute and subacute CVEs were 2.7% and 2.4%, respectively. While balloon postdilation and valve dislodgment/embolization were the predictors of acute CVEs, new-onset atrial fibrillation determined a higher risk for subacute events. Late events were determined mainly by a history of chronic atrial fibrillation and peripheral and cerebrovascular disease. The occurrence of major stroke was associated with increased early and late mortality. These results provide important insights for the implementation of preventive measures for CVEs after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

7 February 2013 in Clinical Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NFNúria Fernández-Hidalgo
Núria Fernández-Hidalgo
BABenito Almirante
Benito Almirante
JGJoan Gavaldà
Joan Gavaldà
MGMercè Gurgui
Mercè Gurgui
CPCarmen Peña
Carmen Peña
APAlbert Pahissa
Albert Pahissa
Background. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the ampicillin plus ceftriaxone (AC) and ampicillin plus gentamicin (AG) combinations for treating Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE). Methods. An observational, nonrandomized, comparative multicenter cohort study was conducted at 17 Spanish and 1 Italian hospitals. Consecutive adult patients diagnosed of EFIE were included. Outcome measurements were death during treatment and at 3 months of follow-up, adverse events requiring treatment withdrawal, treatment failure requiring a change of antimicrobials, and relapse. Results. A larger percentage of AC-treated patients (n = 159) had previous chronic renal failure than AG-treated patients (n = 87) (33% vs 16%, P = .004), and AC patients had a higher incidence of cancer (18% vs 7%, P = .015), transplantation (6% vs 0%, P = .040), and healthcare-acquired infection (59% vs 40%, P = .006). Between AC and AG-treated EFIE patients, there were no differences in mortality while on antimicrobial treatment (22% vs 21%, P = .81) or at 3-month follow-up (8% vs 7%, P = .72), in treatment failure requiring a change in antimicrobials (1% vs 2%, P = .54), or in relapses (3% vs 4%, P = .67). However, interruption of antibiotic treatment due to adverse events was much more frequent in AG-treated patients than in those receiving AC (25% vs 1%, P < .001), mainly due to new renal failure (≥25% increase in baseline creatinine concentration; 23% vs 0%, P < .001). Conclusions. AC appears as effective as AG for treating EFIE patients and can be used with virtually no risk of renal failure and regardless of the high-level aminoglycoside resistance status of E. faecalis.

18 March 2014 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MUMarina Urena
Marina Urena
JWJohn G. Webb
John G. Webb
CTCorrado Tamburino
Corrado Tamburino
AMAntonio J. Muñoz-García
Antonio J. Muñoz-García
ACAsim Cheema
Asim Cheema
JRJosep Rodés-Cabau
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Background—: Very few data exist on the clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of PPI after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on late outcomes in a large cohort of patients. Methods and Results—: A total of 1556 consecutive patients without prior PPI undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation were included. Of them, 239 patients (15.4%) required a PPI within the first 30 days after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. At a mean follow-up of 22±17 months, no association was observed between the need for 30-day PPI and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.30; P =0.871), cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–1.17; P =0.270), and all-cause mortality or rehospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.77–1.30; P =0.980). A lower rate of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death was observed in patients with PPI (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11–0.85; P =0.023). Patients with new PPI showed a poorer evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction over time ( P =0.017), and new PPI was an independent predictor of left ventricular ejection fraction decrease at the 6- to 12-month follow-up (estimated coefficient, −2.26; 95% confidence interval, −4.07 to −0.44; P =0.013; R 2 =0.121). Conclusions—: The need for PPI was a frequent complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation, but it was not associated with any increase in overall or cardiovascular death or rehospitalization for heart failure after a mean follow-up of ≈2 years. Indeed, 30-day PPI was a protective factor for the occurrence of unexpected (sudden or unknown) death. However, new PPI did have a negative effect on left ventricular function over time.

5 May 2015 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IAIgnacio J. Amat-Santos
Ignacio J. Amat-Santos
DMDavid Messika-Zeitoun
David Messika-Zeitoun
HEHelene Eltchaninoff
Helene Eltchaninoff
SKSamir Kapadia
Samir Kapadia
SLStamatios Lerakis
Stamatios Lerakis
JRJosep Rodés-Cabau
Josep Rodés-Cabau
Background—: We aimed to determine the incidence, predictors, clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods and Results—: This multicenter registry included 53 patients (mean age, 79±8 years; men, 57%) who suffered IE after TAVI of 7944 patients after a mean follow-up of 1.1±1.2 years (incidence, 0.67%, 0.50% within the first year after TAVI). Mean time from TAVI was 6 months (interquartile range, 1–14 months). Orotracheal intubation (hazard ratio, 3.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.55–9.64; P =0.004) and the self-expandable CoreValve system (hazard ratio, 3.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.37–7.14; P =0.007) were associated with IE (multivariate analysis including 3067 patients with individual data). The most frequent causal microorganisms were coagulase-negative staphylococci (24%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (21%) and enterococci (21%). Vegetations were present in 77% of patients (transcatheter valve leaflets, 39%; stent frame, 17%; mitral valve, 21%). At least 1 complication of IE occurred in 87% of patients (heart failure in 68%). However, only 11% of patients underwent valve intervention (valve explantation and valve-in-valve procedure in 4 and 2 patients, respectively). The mortality rate in hospital was 47.2% and increased to 66% at the 1-year follow-up. IE complications such as heart failure ( P =0.037) and septic shock ( P =0.002) were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Conclusions—: The incidence of IE at 1 year after TAVI was 0.50%, and the risk increased with the use of orotracheal intubation and a self-expandable valve system. Staphylococci and enterococci were the most common agents. Although most patients presented at least 1 complication of IE, valve intervention was performed in a minority of patients, and nearly half of the patients died during the hospitalization period.

28 February 2007 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJavier López-Díaz
Javier López-Díaz
ARAna Revilla
Ana Revilla
IVIsidre Vilacosta
Isidre Vilacosta
EVEduardo Villacorta
Eduardo Villacorta
CGCarlos González-Juanatey
Carlos González-Juanatey
JCJosé Alberto San Román Calvar
José Alberto San Román Calvar
Aim There is no agreement in the best cutoff time to distinguish between early- and late- onset prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE). Our objectives are to define early-onset PVE according to the microbiological spectrum and to analyse the profile and short-term prognosis of this entity.

1 April 2007 in The American Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJosé Alberto San Román Calvar
José Alberto San Román Calvar
JLJavier López-Díaz
Javier López-Díaz
IVIsidre Vilacosta
Isidre Vilacosta
MLMaría Luaces
María Luaces
CSCristina Sarriá
Cristina Sarriá
FFFrancisco Fernández-Avilés
Francisco Fernández-Avilés