Guillermo Orti

Prof. Guillermo Orti

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

40Years (1987-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 July 2017 in BMC Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRicardo Betancur-R
Ricardo Betancur-R
EWEdward O. Wiley
Edward O. Wiley
GAGloria Arratia
Gloria Arratia
APArturo Acero P.
Arturo Acero P.
NBNicolas Bailly
Nicolas Bailly
GOGuillermo Orti
Guillermo Orti
Fish classifications, as those of most other taxonomic groups, are being transformed drastically as new molecular phylogenies provide support for natural groups that were unanticipated by previous studies. A brief review of the main criteria used by ichthyologists to define their classifications during the last 50 years, however, reveals slow progress towards using an explicit phylogenetic framework. Instead, the trend has been to rely, in varying degrees, on deep-rooted anatomical concepts and authority, often mixing taxa with explicit phylogenetic support with arbitrary groupings. Two leading sources in ichthyology frequently used for fish classifications (JS Nelson’s volumes of Fishes of the World and W. Eschmeyer’s Catalog of Fishes) fail to adopt a global phylogenetic framework despite much recent progress made towards the resolution of the fish Tree of Life. The first explicit phylogenetic classification of bony fishes was published in 2013, based on a comprehensive molecular phylogeny ( www.deepfin.org ). We here update the first version of that classification by incorporating the most recent phylogenetic results. The updated classification presented here is based on phylogenies inferred using molecular and genomic data for nearly 2000 fishes. A total of 72 orders (and 79 suborders) are recognized in this version, compared with 66 orders in version 1. The phylogeny resolves placement of 410 families, or ~80% of the total of 514 families of bony fishes currently recognized. The ordinal status of 30 percomorph families included in this study, however, remains uncertain (incertae sedis in the series Carangaria, Ovalentaria, or Eupercaria). Comments to support taxonomic decisions and comparisons with conflicting taxonomic groups proposed by others are presented. We also highlight cases were morphological support exist for the groups being classified. This version of the phylogenetic classification of bony fishes is substantially improved, providing resolution for more taxa than previous versions, based on more densely sampled phylogenetic trees. The classification presented in this study represents, unlike any other, the most up-to-date hypothesis of the Tree of Life of fishes.

1 January 2013 in PLoS Currents
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RBRicardo Betancur-R.
Ricardo Betancur-R.
RBRichard E. Broughton
Richard E. Broughton
EWEdward O. Wiley
Edward O. Wiley
KCKent Carpenter
Kent Carpenter
JLJ. Andrés López
J. Andrés López
GOGuillermo Orti
Guillermo Orti
The tree of life of fishes is in a state of flux because we still lack a comprehensive phylogeny that includes all major groups. The situation is most critical for a large clade of spiny-finned fishes, traditionally referred to as percomorphs, whose uncertain relationships have plagued ichthyologists for over a century. Most of what we know about the higher-level relationships among fish lineages has been based on morphology, but rapid influx of molecular studies is changing many established systematic concepts. We report a comprehensive molecular phylogeny for bony fishes that includes representatives of all major lineages. DNA sequence data for 21 molecular markers (one mitochondrial and 20 nuclear genes) were collected for 1410 bony fish taxa, plus four tetrapod species and two chondrichthyan outgroups (total 1416 terminals). Bony fish diversity is represented by 1093 genera, 369 families, and all traditionally recognized orders. The maximum likelihood tree provides unprecedented resolution and high bootstrap support for most backbone nodes, defining for the first time a global phylogeny of fishes. The general structure of the tree is in agreement with expectations from previous morphological and molecular studies, but significant new clades arise. Most interestingly, the high degree of uncertainty among percomorphs is now resolved into nine well-supported supraordinal groups. The order Perciformes, considered by many a polyphyletic taxonomic waste basket, is defined for the first time as a monophyletic group in the global phylogeny. A new classification that reflects our phylogenetic hypothesis is proposed to facilitate communication about the newly found structure of the tree of life of fishes. Finally, the molecular phylogeny is calibrated using 60 fossil constraints to produce a comprehensive time tree. The new time-calibrated phylogeny will provide the basis for and stimulate new comparative studies to better understand the evolution of the amazing diversity of fishes.

14 May 2018 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LHLily C. Hughes
Lily C. Hughes
GOGuillermo Orti
Guillermo Orti
YHYu Huang
Yu Huang
YSYing Sun
Ying Sun
CBCarole C. Baldwin
Carole C. Baldwin
QSQiong Shi
Qiong Shi
Significance: Ray-finned fishes form the largest and most diverse group of vertebrates. Establishing their phylogenetic relationships is a critical step to explaining their diversity. We compiled the largest comparative genomic database of fishes that provides genome-scale support for previous phylogenetic results and used it to resolve further some contentious relationships in fish phylogeny. A vetted set of exon markers identified in this study is a promising resource for current sequencing approaches to significantly increase genetic and taxonomic coverage to resolve the tree of life for all fishes. Our time-calibrated analysis suggests that most lineages of living fishes were already established in the Mesozoic Period, more than 65 million years ago.

26 September 2011 in BMC Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
COClaudio Oliveira
Claudio Oliveira
GAGleisy S Avelino
Gleisy S Avelino
KAKelly T Abe
Kelly T Abe
TMTatiane C Mariguela
Tatiane C Mariguela
RBRicardo C Benine
Ricardo C Benine
RCRicardo M Corrêa e Castro
Ricardo M Corrêa e Castro
With nearly 1,100 species, the fish family Characidae represents more than half of the species of Characiformes, and is a key component of Neotropical freshwater ecosystems. The composition, phylogeny, and classification of Characidae is currently uncertain, despite significant efforts based on analysis of morphological and molecular data. No consensus about the monophyly of this group or its position within the order Characiformes has been reached, challenged by the fact that many key studies to date have non-overlapping taxonomic representation and focus only on subsets of this diversity.

1 January 2007 in BMC Ecology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChenhong Li
Chenhong Li
GOGuillermo Orti
Guillermo Orti
GZGong Zhang
Gong Zhang
GLGuoqing Lu
Guoqing Lu
Molecular systematics occupies one of the central stages in biology in the genomic era, ushered in by unprecedented progress in DNA technology. The inference of organismal phylogeny is now based on many independent genetic loci, a widely accepted approach to assemble the tree of life. Surprisingly, this approach is hindered by lack of appropriate nuclear gene markers for many taxonomic groups especially at high taxonomic level, partially due to the lack of tools for efficiently developing new phylogenetic makers. We report here a genome-comparison strategy to identifying nuclear gene markers for phylogenetic inference and apply it to the ray-finned fishes – the largest vertebrate clade in need of phylogenetic resolution.

1 January 2015 in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADahiana Arcila
Dahiana Arcila
RPR. Alexander Pyron
R. Alexander Pyron
JTJames C. Tyler
James C. Tyler
GOGuillermo Orti
Guillermo Orti
RBRicardo Betancur-R.
Ricardo Betancur-R.