Mihnea DAVIDESCU

Dr. Mihnea DAVIDESCU

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 April 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BTBogdan Cosmin Tanase
Bogdan Cosmin Tanase
THTeodor Horvat
Teodor Horvat
MDMihnea DAVIDESCU
Mihnea DAVIDESCU
CLAUDIU-EDUARD NISTORCLAUDIU-EDUARD NISTOR
CLAUDIU-EDUARD NISTOR
Muntean CalinMuntean Calin
Muntean Calin
ABAlin Burlacu
Alin Burlacu
Background and Objectives: The benefit of lobe-specific lymph node dissection (LS-LND) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains debated, especially in early-stage disease. Previous reviews often included all stages, leaving a gap in focused evaluations of clinical stage IA–IB NSCLC. This systematic review, supplemented by our institutional experience, aimed to compare overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and postoperative complications between LS-LND and systematic lymph node dissection (S-LND) in clinical stage IA–IB NSCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients treated at our institution (14 S-LND vs. 10 LS-LND). Data on patient demographics, operative details, OS, RFS, and postoperative complications were collected. Risk of bias was assessed using established methodological tools. A targeted literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception to 14 April 2022. Only three articles (total n = 1101 patients) met inclusion criteria focusing on clinical stage IA–IB NSCLC who underwent curative-intent resection. Results: LS-LND demonstrated comparable or slightly improved 5-year OS (range: 69.7–96.7%) versus S-LND (64.9–92.0%), and similar or slightly higher RFS (66.0–95.6% in LS-LND vs. 60.8–88.8% in S-LND). In our cohort, the 5-year OS was 78.6% in S-LND vs. 80.0% in LS-LND, and the 5-year RFS was 71.4% vs. 70.0%, respectively. Postoperative complications such as arrhythmias were less frequent in LS-LND groups overall. Our data showed a low rate of pneumonia in S-LND compared to LS-LND (7.1% vs. 10.0%); however, arrhythmias accounted for 14.3% in S-LND vs. 10.0% in LS-LND). Conclusions: For clinical stage IA–IB NSCLC, LS-LND offers oncologic outcomes that are comparable to S-LND, with a potential for reduced postoperative complications. The findings from our institution align with these trends observed in the literature. While these results suggest potential advantages of lobe-specific approaches, definitive conclusions require further validation through larger, prospective randomized studies to confirm the clinical benefits of LS-LND in early-stage NSCLC.