Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is used for treating keratoconus and post–laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia. However, refractive surgery is not usually performed with prophylactic CXL. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of refractive surgeries with vs without prophylactic CXL. We systematically searched databases for studies comparing refractive surgeries for myopic correction with vs without prophylactic corneal crosslinking. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used to perform statistical analysis. We included 2820 eyes from 28 studies. Compared with refractive surgery alone, surgery with prophylactic CXL resulted in decreased central corneal thickness, corrected distance visual acuity logMAR, and safety and efficacy indices. There were no significant differences in postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better at ≥12 months and other visual outcomes among both groups. More randomized controlled trials with standard crosslinking protocols are needed to analyze the prophylactic use of crosslinking with refractive surgeries.

Background: The risk of recurrence of early-stage cervical cancer (CC) is associated with prognostic factors such as tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep stromal invasion (DSI). However, the adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy (RT) following surgery to reduce the risk of recurrence in “intermediate risk” remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the role of adjuvant RT in the recurrence and identify prognostic factors. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies comparing adjuvant RT versus no adjuvant treatment in early-stage CC patients with intermediate-risk factors defined by GOG-92 criteria. Outcomes were recurrence, local recurrence, death, 5-year overall survival (5y-OS), and 5-year disease-free survival (5y-DFS). Tumor size ≥ 4 cm, LVSI, and DSI were also evaluated as prognostic factors for recurrence. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 7.2.0. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics. Results: A total of 1504 patients from nine studies were included; only one study was a randomized controlled trial, while the others were retrospective cohorts. Adjuvant RT was used to treat 781 patients (52%). Median follow-up ranged from 48 to 120 months. Recurrence (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.38–1.46; p = 0.39), local recurrence (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.44–1.20; p = 0.22), death (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.52–1.80; p = 0.91), 5y-OS (OR 1.22; 95% CI 0.36–4.18; p = 0.75), and 5y-DFS (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.42–1.43 p = 0.42) revealed no statistically significant differences between adjuvant RT and observation groups. TS ≥ 4 cm was an independent prognostic risk factor for recurrence (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.12–2.97; p = 0.02). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that adjuvant RT does not reduce recurrence risk in early-stage cervical cancer. Consider TS ≥ 4 cm as a significant prognostic factor for recurrence. Adjuvant RT in intermediate-risk patients should be considered with caution due the lack of significant improvement in recurrence until the CERVANTES and GOG-0263 trial results become available.

Objective To compare outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection/In vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI) plus immunosuppressants such as prednisolone, prednisone, or cyclosporine A versus the use of IVF/ICSI alone. Data source Databases were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases in September 2023. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials and observational […] Abstract Objective To compare outcomes in patients with repeated implantation failure undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection/In vitro fertilization (IVF/ICSI) plus immunosuppressants such as prednisolone, prednisone, or cyclosporine A versus the use of IVF/ICSI alone. Data source Databases were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases in September 2023. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials and observational […]

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sotatercept, an activin signaling inhibitor, in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sotatercept versus placebo in PAH. We calculated pooled risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with I² statistics. The GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Three RCTs comprising 601 patients were included. Compared to placebo, sotatercept significantly improved 6-minute walk distance (MD 40.57 m; 95% CI 26.64 to 54.5; p < 0.01), and WHO functional class (RR 2.04; 95% CI 1.53 to 2.7; p < 0.01). Sotatercept reduced pulmonary vascular resistance (MD -233.18 dyn·sec·cm^-5; 95% CI -295.84 to -170.52; p < 0.01) and pulmonary artery pressure (MD -14.94 mmHg; 95% CI -19.62 to -10.27; p < 0.01) at study end. No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality or NT-proBNP levels. Sotatercept was associated with epistaxis, increased hemoglobin, and telangiectasia adverse events. Sotatercept improves exercise capacity, WHO functional class and pulmonary hemodynamics in PAH, with an acceptable safety profile. Long-term studies are needed to confirm sustained benefits. www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD420251032174.

Background After recently published randomized clinical trials, the choice of the best anesthetic procedure for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) is not definite. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of general anesthesia (GA) versus conscious sedation (CS) in patients with AIS who underwent MT, explicitly focusing on procedural and clinical outcomes and the incidence of adverse events. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing GA versus CS in patients who underwent MT due to LVO-AIS. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for binary outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Random effects models were used for all outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics. Results Eight RCTs (1,300 patients) were included, of whom 650 (50%) underwent GA. Recanalization success was significantly higher in the GA group (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.26–2.24; p < 0.04) than in CS. No significant difference between groups were found for good functional recovery (OR 1.13; IC 95% 0.76–1.67; p = 0.56), incidence of pneumonia (OR 1.23; IC 95% 0.56- 2,69; p = 0.61), three-month mortality (OR 0.99; IC 95% 0.73–1.34; p = 0.95), or cerebral hemorrhage (OR 0.97; IC 95% 0.68–1.38; p = 0.88). Conclusion Despite the increase in recanalization success rates in the GA group, GA and CS show similar rates of good functional recovery, three-month mortality, incidence of pneumonia, and cerebral hemorrhage in patients undergoing MT.