Forest W. Arnold

Dr. Forest W. Arnold

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 May 2007 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAForest W. Arnold
Forest W. Arnold
JSJames T. Summersgill
James T. Summersgill
ALAndrew S. LaJoie
Andrew S. LaJoie
PPPaula Peyrani
Paula Peyrani
TMThomas J. Marrie
Thomas J. Marrie
TIthe Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization (CAPO) Investigators
the Community-Acquired Pneumonia Organization (CAPO) Investigators
Rationale: Controversy still exists in the international literature regarding the need to use antimicrobials covering atypical pathogens when initially treating hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In different regions of the world, monotherapy with a β-lactam antimicrobial is common. Objectives: We sought to correlate the incidence of CAP due to atypical pathogens in different regions of the world with the proportion of patients treated with an atypical regimen in those same regions. In addition, we sought to compare clinical outcomes of patients with CAP treated with and without atypical coverage. Methods: A secondary analysis was performed using two comprehensive international databases. World regions were defined as North America (I), Europe (II), Latin America (III), and Asia and Africa (IV). Time to reach clinical stability, length of hospital stay, and mortality were compared between patients treated with and without atypical coverage. Measurements and Main Results: The incidence of CAP due to atypical pathogens from 4,337 patients was 22, 28, 21, and 20% in regions I–IV, respectively. The proportion of patients treated with atypical coverage from 2,208 patients was 91, 74, 53, and 10% in regions I–IV, respectively. Patients treated with atypical coverage had decreased time to clinical stability (3.7 vs. 3.2 d, p < 0.001), decreased length of stay (7.1 vs. 6.1 d, p < 0.01), decreased total mortality (11.1 vs. 7%, p < 0.01), and decreased CAP-related mortality (6.4 vs. 3.8%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: The significant global presence of atypical pathogens and the better outcomes associated with antimicrobial regimens with atypical coverage support empiric therapy for all hospitalized patients with CAP with a regimen that covers atypical pathogens.

12 September 2009 in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FAForest W. Arnold
Forest W. Arnold
ALA. Scott LaJoie
A. Scott LaJoie
GBGuy Brock
Guy Brock
PPPaula Peyrani
Paula Peyrani
JRJordi Rello
Jordi Rello
JRJulio A Ramirez
Julio A Ramirez
Community Acquired pneumonia (CAP) causes significant morbidity and mortality worldwide in elderly patients.1 Death due to pneumonia has been reported as high as 20% in this population.2 Most patients hospitalized for CAP are elderly (≥65 years), and the annual cost of treatment is $4.8 billion, compared with $3.6 billion for patients younger than 65 years.3

1 July 2013 in Respiratory Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FAForest W. Arnold
Forest W. Arnold
TWTimothy L. Wiemken
Timothy L. Wiemken
PPPaula Peyrani
Paula Peyrani
JRJulio A Ramirez
Julio A Ramirez
GBGuy Brock
Guy Brock

1 December 2013 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAllen T. Griffin
Allen T. Griffin
TTimothy Wiemken
Timothy Wiemken
FAForest W. Arnold
Forest W. Arnold

9 January 2020 in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAForest W. Arnold
Forest W. Arnold
AVAndrea M. Reyes Vega
Andrea M. Reyes Vega
VSVidyulata Salunkhe
Vidyulata Salunkhe
SFStephen P Furmanek
Stephen P Furmanek
CFChristian Furman
Christian Furman
JRJulio A Ramirez
Julio A Ramirez

1 April 2006 in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAForest W. Arnold
Forest W. Arnold
LML. Clifford McDonald
L. Clifford McDonald
RSR. Scott Smith
R. Scott Smith
DNDavid Newman
David Newman
JRJulio A Ramirez
Julio A Ramirez
Objective.: To determine whether feedback on antimicrobial use improves physician compliance with local hospital guidelines on antimicrobial prescribing.Design.: In this time series analysis, in which a historical control period was compared with an intervention period, all orders for antimicrobials (except those for surgical prophylaxis) placed from November 1, 2002, through April 30, 2004, were prospectively evaluated by an antimicrobial management team (AMT) for compliance with local hospital guidelines. During the control period, orders were evaluated to determine compliance with hospital guidelines before and after recommendations by the AMT were provided to physicians. Feedback was given for the second 9-month period in the form of a weekly report to prescribing physicians, a monthly hospital newsletter, and a quarterly report to various hospital committees. During the intervention period, orders were evaluated to determine compliance with hospital guidelines before and after recommendations by the AMT were provided to physicians.Setting.: The Veterans Affairs Medical Center, a 110-bed facility, in Louisville, Kentucky.Participants.: Internal medicine physicians and general surgeons.Results.: A total of 2,807 antimicrobial courses were evaluated. Compliance with hospital guidelines before AMT recommendations was 70% during the control period and 74% during the intervention period (P= .02). Compliance after AMT recommendations was 90% during the control period and 93% during the intervention period (P≤ .01).Conclusion.: The use of feedback had a significantly favorable impact on physician compliance with the hospital's guidelines on antimicrobial prescribing. Use of feedback should be added to the list of interventions that promote appropriate antimicrobial use in the hospital setting.