Yunnan Province, a global biodiversity hotspot, hosts a diverse array of Acrididae grasshoppers essential for ecosystem dynamics and agriculture. To elucidate the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of this group, we sequenced and analyzed complete mitochondrial genomes from 17 Acrididae species endemic to Yunnan, with genome lengths ranging from 15,403 to 15,943 base pairs. These data were integrated with mitochondrial sequences from 46 additional species to construct comprehensive phylogenetic trees. The maximum-likelihood tree identified four major clades with robust support (bootstrap values > 90%), revealing significant lineage diversification during the Early Eocene (51.94 million years ago, Mya) and subsequent radiations in the Miocene (~20 Mya) and Pliocene (~5 Mya). These divergence times correlate with major geological events and climatic shifts in the region, such as the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau and the intensification of the Asian monsoon. Notably, several species within the Coptacrinae and Oxyinae subfamilies, particularly Pseudodotraulia cornuata and Spathosternum prasiniferum, were found to be polyphyletic, indicating the necessity for taxonomic revisions. Further cluster analyses of codon usage bias and genetic distance support these taxonomic revisions within Acrididae. This robust phylogenetic framework underpins conservation strategies aimed at preserving Yunnan’s rich grasshopper biodiversity and informs updates to their phylogeny.

Background/Objectives: The genus Pielomastax Chang (Orthoptera: Eumastacoidea, 1937) is endemic to China, which is mainly distributed in low- and medium-altitude areas in central and eastern China. However, there are relatively few molecular data studies on the genus Pielomastax. Methods: In this study, three species of the genus Pielomastax were collected from Hubei and Henan, China, namely Pielomastax sp., Pielomastax shennongjiaensis Wang (1995) and Pielomastax tenuicerca Hsia and Liu (1989). Both Pielomastax sp. and Pielomastax shennongjiaensis were collected from the Shennongjia area of Hubei, but they exhibit some differences in morphological characteristics. Results: We obtained the mitochondrial genome structures of the three species, which were similar to those of the published mitochondrial genome structures of species within Eumastacoidea with 37 typical mitochondrial genes, including 13 PCGs, 22 tRNAs, and 2 ribosomal RNAs. The results of the maximum likelihood (ML) tree and the Bayesian inference (BI) tree showed that the families Eumastacidae, Chorotypidae and Episactinae in Eumastacoidea are a monophyletic group, and Thericleinae and Episactinae are sister clades. The time-calibrated phylogeny results indicated that the divergence time between Thericleinae and Episactinae was 95.58 Ma (56.71–128.02 Ma). Conclusions: These phylogenetic tree results indicate that Pielomastax sp. and Pielomastax shennongjiaensis are the same species. And the time-calibrated phylogeny tree and the species distribution map of the genus Pielomastax indicate that the species of the genus Pielomastax spread from eastern to central China and diversified. These studies fill the gap in molecular data for the genus Pielomastax and the taxonomic status of Episactidae.

Background: Asilomorpha, an infraorder of predatory Diptera (Brachycera), is of significant evolutionary interest due to their remarkable ecological diversity, broad size range, and specialized feeding behaviors. However, phylogenetic studies of this group have been limited by sampling challenges. Methods: In this study, we sequenced the complete mitochondrial genomes of two Chinese endemic species, Clephydroneura jiangxiensis (C. jiangxiensis) and Maira xizangensis (M. xizangensis), using whole-genome random sequencing. By integrating these novel data with published sequences from NCBI, we reconstructed the phylogeny of three superfamilies (Asiloidea, Empidoidea, and Nemestrinoidea). Results: Both mitochondrial genomes exhibit the typical 37 genes (13 protein-coding genes, 22 tRNAs, and 2 rRNAs) and display pronounced AT bias. Congruent results from maximum likelihood analysis and Bayesian inference strongly supported the ideas that both new species are placed in Asilidae and that the Asilidae family is monophyletic. However, relationships among the three superfamilies remain unclear. Our results suggest that (1) although Asiloidea and Nemestrinidea are closely related, the potential positioning of Nemestrinoidea as an independent superfamily is worth investigating; and (2) Empidoidea may form a sister group to Asiloidea + Nemestrinidae, though this hypothesis requires further corroboration given the basal position of Hemipenthes hebeiensis (Bombyliidae). Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for expanded taxon sampling, particularly of underrepresented families, to resolve deep-level relationships within Asilomorpha. Clarifying the phylogenetic relationships within Asilomorpha will facilitate future investigations into their evolutionary origins and the evolution of characteristic traits.