Background/Objectives: COVID-19 poses significant physiological challenges for athletes, particularly those engaged in high-intensity intermittent sports such as ice hockey. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection—especially symptomatic cases—on aerobic and anaerobic performance in professional ice hockey players. Methods: Fifty athletes from the Polish Hockey League were assigned to three groups: control (CG, n = 13), asymptomatic COVID-19 (NSG, n = 28), and symptomatic COVID-19 with post-infection SpO₂ < 90% (WSG, n = 9). Each underwent assessments at three time points—pre-preparatory period 2020/2021, post-preparatory period 2020/2021, and pre-preparatory period 2021/2022. Aerobic capacity was measured via a progressive cycle ergometer test (VO₂max, VO₂ at lactate threshold [VO_2Lt], minute ventilation [V’E], breathing frequency [BF], and lactate clearance rate [ΔLa]), and anaerobic capacity via a 30 s Wingate test (relative mean power). Results: Compared with CG and NSG, symptomatic athletes exhibited significant post-infection declines in VO₂max (48.2 ± 2.9 vs. 56.2 ± 6.2 and 54.6 ± 3.9 mL/kg/min; p = 0.006, d = 1.56 vs. CG; p < 0.024, d = 1.79 vs. NSG) and VO_2Lt (p < 0.05). Relative mean power also decreased in WSG (p < 0.05). In contrast, CG and NSG improved or maintained these metrics over the same period. Symptomatic players showed elevated BF post infection (p = 0.022, d = 1.72) and reduced V’E (p = 0.035; d = 0.83), while ΔLa was markedly lower (p = 0.0004; d = 2.86). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly symptomatic cases, can significantly impair both aerobic and anaerobic capacity in elite hockey players. Targeted recovery protocols are essential for restoring performance in affected athletes.

Background: Shooting velocity is a critical determinant of competitive success in ice hockey, yet evidence for the use of weighted-implement training in high-level junior players is limited and the long-term retention of such adaptations has not been documented. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of off-ice shooting training performed with a heavy (260 g) versus a regular (170 g) puck on on-ice shooting velocity, accuracy and handgrip strength in junior players, and to examine the retention of these changes. Methods: Twenty male junior ice hockey players (18–19 years) were randomly allocated to a Heavy-puck group (n = 10) or a Regular-puck group (n = 10) and completed an identical six-week off-ice shooting programme (18 sessions, 100 shots per session) with their respective pucks. On-ice wrist-shot and snap-shot speed (radar; standard 170 g puck for both groups), on-ice shooting accuracy and bilateral handgrip strength were assessed before the intervention (pre-test), immediately after six weeks (post 6 weeks) and after a six-week retention period of normal on-ice training (post 12 weeks). Data were analysed with 2 × 3 mixed-model ANOVA with Bonferroni-corrected post hoc comparisons. Results: A significant Group × Time interaction was found for wrist-shot speed (ηp² = 0.61), snap-shot speed (ηp² = 0.78), left-hand handgrip strength (ηp² = 0.30) and shooting accuracy (ηp² = 0.24). The Heavy-puck group displayed substantially larger velocity gains at both post 6 weeks (wrist shot d = 2.97; snap shot d = 4.73) and post 12 weeks (d = 2.56 and d = 3.21, respectively). Left-hand handgrip strength gain was also greater in the Heavy-puck group at post 12 weeks (d = 1.40). A short-term cost on accuracy was observed in the Heavy-puck group at post 6 weeks (d = −1.21), which was fully recovered at post 12 weeks. Conclusions: Heavy-puck off-ice training produced large and durable improvements in on-ice puck velocity, with a transient and recoverable cost on accuracy, supporting its inclusion in the off-ice preparation of junior ice hockey players.

This study investigated the influence of aerobic capacity on lactate clearance rate and heart rate recovery during ice hockey matches. Considering the growing intensity and anaerobic demands of modern ice hockey, the ability to recover quickly between high-intensity shifts is essential for optimal performance. Thirty-eight amateur ice hockey players (age: 35 ± 5 years; VO₂max: 48.93 ± 3.88 mL·min⁻¹·kg⁻¹) from the Silesian Amateur Hockey League underwent laboratory ramp tests to determine VO₂max, followed by on-ice repeated sprint tests and heart rate monitoring during matches. The results demonstrated significant positive correlations between VO₂max and lactate clearance (ΔLa4–8min [mmol/L]= 2.55 ± 0.58 mmol·L⁻¹; rho = 0.545; p < 0.001), as well as heart rate recovery (Δ%HRmax = 25.88 ± 2.09%; rho = 0.682; p < 0.001). Players with higher VO₂max exhibited a faster reduction in heart rate during recovery periods between shifts and maintained better sprint performance (rho = –0.877; p < 0.001). These findings confirm that higher aerobic capacity enhances both metabolic and autonomic recovery processes, enabling players to sustain high-intensity efforts more effectively during the game. The study highlights the importance of developing aerobic fitness in hockey training to improve recovery efficiency and match performance.

Background/Objectives: Shaft stiffness (“flex”) is the only routinely individualised ice hockey stick specification, yet evidence on its effect on shooting is inconsistent; this is because previous studies have used fixed stiffness levels for players of different sizes and strengths. We determined the effect of deviating, in either direction, from the player’s habitual flex, congruent with the body mass reference flex, on on-ice shooting velocity and snap-shot accuracy in junior players. Methods: Thirty male junior players (18–19 years) whose habitual effective flex was within ±10 units of the body mass reference flex completed a complete counterbalanced (Williams-type) crossover with three sticks differing only in nominal shaft flex—the habitual flex (FLEX₀), a shaft 15 units more compliant (FLEX₋₁₅), and one 15 units stiffer (FLEX₊₁₅)—each preceded by three familiarisation sessions. Wrist- and snap-shot velocity (radar) and snap-shot accuracy in an externally paced target task were analysed with linear mixed models. Results: Flex affected wrist-shot velocity (ηp² = 0.35), snap-shot velocity (ηp² = 0.68) and snap-shot accuracy (ηp² = 0.34), with all three outcomes highest at FLEX₀. The wrist shot lost 2.9% with both deviations, whereas the snap shot lost 5.6% with the compliant shaft, but only 1.6% with the stiff shaft (Flex × Technique ηp² = 0.29). Snap-shot accuracy fell by 9.1 and 14.4 percentage points. Conclusions: In players fitted within ±10 units of the body mass reference flex, deviations of ±15 flex units from the habitual flex were associated with lower shooting velocity and snap-shot accuracy; for the snap shot, an over-compliant shaft was the costlier deviation.