Objective: Patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) generally have a poor prognosis. Many of these patients have a good performance status. A new all-oral regimen (XIC) was evaluated in a phase II trial. The impact of the regimen on the safety and efficacy of the drug, as well as quality of life (QOL) of the patients was assessed. Patients andMethods:From September 2000 to September 2001, informed consent was obtained from 20 heavily pretreated women with MBC. They were placed on a 6-week cycle regimen comprising capecitabine (X; 2,000 mg/m2/day in two divided doses for 2 weeks then 1 week rest), idarubicin (I; 10 mg/m2/day, days 1, 3 and 5) and cyclophosphamide (C; 100 mg/m2/day for 2 weeks then 1 week rest). Results: Toxicities were generally tolerable. One patient had grade III neutropenia, which was reversible on cessation of treatment. One patient (5%) had a complete response and 4 patients (20%) achieved partial responses, yielding an overall response rate of 25%. Eight patients (40%) had stable disease. Median time to disease progression and median survival time were 13.4 and 23.7 months, respectively. Global and physical EORTC QLQ-30 scores showed no significant decrease in QOL. Conclusion: This is a small-scale study. XIC was generally well tolerated and favoured by the patients. This moderately active and convenient ‘all-oral’ regimen deserves clinical trials at a wider scale.

In the UK, Trifluridine-tipiracil (Lonsurf) is used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer in the third-line setting, after prior exposure to fluoropyrimidine-based regimes. Current data on the real-world use of Lonsurf lack long-term follow-up data. A retrospective evaluation of patients receiving Lonsurf at our Cancer Centre in 2016–2017 was performed, all with a minimum of two-year follow-up. Fifty-six patients were included in the review. The median number of cycles of Lonsurf administered was 3. Median follow-up was 6.0 months, with all patients deceased at the time of analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.2 months, and overall survival (OS) was 5.8 months. The median interval from Lonsurf discontinuation to death was two months, but seven patients received further systemic treatment and median OS gained was 12 months. Lonsurf offered a slightly better PFS but inferior OS to that of the RECOURSE trial, with PFS similar to real-world data previously presented. Interestingly, 12.5% had a PFS > 9 months, and this cohort had primarily left-sided and RAS wild-type disease. A subset received further systemic treatment on Lonsurf discontinuation with good additional OS benefit. Lonsurf may alter the course of disease for a subset of patients, and further treatment on progression can be considered in carefully selected patients.

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are common ablative techniques for lung metastases. A retrospective review of all patients treated with either modality at a single institution between 2011 and 2019 was conducted. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared. Local and distant progression, and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariable analysis was carried out using Cox regression; this was followed by multivariable modelling. In total, 106 patients treated with RFA and 70 treated with SBRT were identified. Tumours treated with SBRT were larger (median size 18 mm vs. 11 mm) and primarily oligometastatic (91.4% vs. 20%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.5 months for SBRT and 7.9 months for RFA (p = 0.009). Median OS was similar (p = 0.66). In multivariable analysis, lesion size > 20 mm was predictive of adverse local PFS (p = 0.001), PFS (p = 0.0034) and OS (p = 0.001). A statistically significant interaction effect suggested that RFA was associated with better local PFS within colorectal primary patients (p = 0.035). This study highlights differences in patient selection and outcomes for RFA or SBRT in the treatment of lung metastases at our institution. Future studies for SBRT should focus on the optimum dose schedules required for different histologies. For less-radiosensitive tumours, RFA may offer a superior alternative where dose-escalated SBRT is not possible.

Oesophageal cancer is a disease of dismal prognosis. There are variations of epidemiology among different ethnic groups and geographic regions. India is a country with high incidence. This can be attributed to the interplay between environmental, dietary factors and life-style of the population of the country. Optimal therapeutic strategy for patients with oesophageal cancer demands individual consideration. Majority of oesophageal cancer patients present at an advanced stage of disease. Screening programmes or strategies aiming at early diagnosis can improve the prognosis; unfortunately this is not cost-effective except in very high incidence areas. Accurate staging can help select the most appropriate treatments, such as excluding those patients with metastatic disease who are unlikely to benefit from surgery, and treating very early lesions with endoscopic means. When surgery is indicated, treating patient in a high-volume centre can improve the outcome and minimise complications. Although surgical resection remains the main treatment modality, long-term prognosis after surgical resection alone has been suboptimal except in those with early disease. Multidisciplinary approaches including chemotherapy and radiotherapy with or without surgery are increasingly employed for patients with advanced disease. Collaboration among surgeons, clinical oncologists, radiologists and physicians is of utmost importance to achieve the best results. Treatment for patients should be individualised to enhance outcome.

Background: Pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is a rare condition that usually presents in young individuals and is associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-translocation. Case presentation: We report a case of an 18-year-old Caucasian man with ALK-translocated pulmonary IMT treated with multimodality therapy. The patient presented with breathlessness and was found to have a collapsed left lung. Further investigations revealed an ALK-translocated pulmonary IMT. This is usually treated with an ALK-inhibitor but patient declined after discussing potential side-effects and had repeated rigid bronchoscopic interventions for local disease control. Due to persistent local recurrence, patient received radical external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with pulse steroids, and one year later started on Ibuprofen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID). Following multimodality treatment, he developed a complete response. He remains treatment-free for the past seven years. Eleven years on from his diagnosis, he remains in remission with a ECOG performance status of zero. Conclusions: Achieving long-term local control in pulmonary IMT can be challenging. Multimodality treatment is sometimes needed but the overall outlook remains good.