Amelia Mattia

Dr. Amelia Mattia

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 June 2023 in Current Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LTLetizia Todeschini
Letizia Todeschini
LCLuca Cristin
Luca Cristin
AMAlessandro Martinino
Alessandro Martinino
AMAmelia Mattia
Amelia Mattia
SASalvatore Agnes
Salvatore Agnes
FGFrancesco Giovinazzo
Francesco Giovinazzo
Liver transplantation is a treatment option for nonresectable patients with early-stage HCC, with more significant advantages when Milan criteria are fulfilled. An immunosuppressive regimen is required to reduce the risk of graft rejection after transplantation, and CNIs represent the drugs of choice in this setting. However, their inhibitory effect on T-cell activity accounts for a higher risk of tumour regrowth. mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) have been introduced as an alternative immunosuppressive approach to conventional CNI-based regimens to address both immunosuppression and cancer control. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR signalling pathway regulates protein translation, cell growth, and metabolism, and the pathway is frequently deregulated in human tumours. Several studies have suggested the role of mTORi in reducing HCC progression after LT, accounting for a lower recurrence rate. Furthermore, mTOR immunosuppression controls the renal damage associated with CNI exposure. Conversion to mTOR inhibitors is associated with stabilizing and recovering renal dysfunction, suggesting an essential renoprotective effect. Limitations in this therapeutic approach are related to their negative impact on lipid and glucose metabolism as well as on proteinuria development and wound healing. This review aims to summarize the roles of mTORi in managing patients with HCC undergoing LT. Strategies to overcome common adverse effects are also proposed.

12 May 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMartina Milazzo
Martina Milazzo
LTLetizia Todeschini
Letizia Todeschini
MCMiriam Caimano
Miriam Caimano
AMAmelia Mattia
Amelia Mattia
LCLuca Cristin
Luca Cristin
FGFrancesco Giovinazzo
Francesco Giovinazzo
Surgical resection is the gold standard for treating synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). The resection of the primary tumor and metastatic lesions can follow different sequences: “simultaneous”, “bowel-first”, and “liver-first”. Conservative approaches, such as parenchymal-sparing surgery and segmentectomy, may serve as alternatives to major hepatectomy. A comprehensive search of Medline, Epistemonikos, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies evaluating patients who underwent surgery for CRLM and reported survival results were included. Other secondary outcomes were analyzed, including disease-free survival, perioperative complications and mortality, and recurrence rates. Quality assessment was performed using the AMSTAR-2 method. No significant differences in overall survival, disease-free survival, and secondary outcomes were observed when comparing simultaneous to “bowel-first” resections, despite a higher rate of perioperative mortality in the former group. The 5-year OS was significantly higher for simultaneous resection compared to “liver-first” resection. No significant differences in OS and DFS were noted when comparing “liver-first” to “bowel-first” resection, or anatomic to non-anatomic resection. Our umbrella review validates simultaneous surgery as an effective oncological approach for treating SCRLM, though the increased risk of perioperative morbidity highlights the importance of selecting suitable patients. Non-anatomic resections might be favored to preserve liver function and enable future surgical interventions.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGian Luigi Canu
Gian Luigi Canu
Fabio MedasFabio Medas
Fabio Medas
FCFederico Cappellacci
Federico Cappellacci
Giulia LanzollaGiulia Lanzolla
Giulia Lanzolla
Leonardo RossiLeonardo Rossi
Leonardo Rossi
RGRAGNO Study Collaborative Group
RAGNO Study Collaborative Group
Background: Postoperative neck hematoma is an infrequent but potentially fatal complication following thyroidectomy. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on the occurrence of this complication. Methods: Patients who underwent thyroidectomy between January 2020 and December 2022 in nine high-volume thyroid surgery centers in Europe were retrospectively evaluated. Based on taking direct oral anticoagulants, patients were divided into two groups: the DOAC Group and the Control Group. Propensity score matching 1:1 was performed between the two groups, which were then compared through a univariate analysis. Results: The total number of patients enrolled based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria was 8985. Following propensity score matching, the study population consisted of 316 patients: 158 in the DOAC Group and 158 in the Control Group. In the DOAC Group, the overall incidence of neck hematoma was 5.70% (4.43% for neck hematomas managed conservatively, and 1.27% for those that required surgical revision of hemostasis). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the incidence of this complication. Hospital readmission due to neck hematoma was not observed in any patient. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the timing of the onset of neck hematomas that required surgical revision of hemostasis. Conclusions: This study showed that direct oral anticoagulants, in the field of thyroid surgery, have no impact on the occurrence of postoperative neck hematoma. Therefore, based on our findings, it can be concluded that thyroidectomy can be safely performed in patients taking this class of drugs.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ETEmanuela Traini
Emanuela Traini
ALAndrea Lanzafame
Andrea Lanzafame
GCGIULIA CARNASSALE
GIULIA CARNASSALE
GDGiuseppe Daloiso
Giuseppe Daloiso
NBNiccolò Borghesan
Niccolò Borghesan
AMAmelia Mattia
Amelia Mattia
Synchronous multiple parathyroid carcinoma is a rare condition within the already uncommon landscape of parathyroid malignancies, which comprise less than 1% of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism cases. To date, only seven cases of synchronous multiple parathyroid carcinoma in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism have been documented. This exceptional rarity complicates both the diagnostic process and therapeutic decision-making. Clinically, parathyroid carcinoma typically presents as a single mass determining severe symptoms. However, no single clinical, biochemical, or imaging feature allows for definitive preoperative diagnosis. Imaging modalities such as ultrasound and sestamibi scans exhibit variable sensitivity and may overlook multi-gland involvement. Histopathological examination remains the only reliable diagnostic method. Management strategies are also controversial: while some advocate for conservative surgery, en bloc resection is generally recommended for its association with improved local control and disease-free survival. Given the exceptional occurrence of synchronous multiple parathyroid carcinoma, there is a lack of standardized protocols for managing parathyroid carcinoma in cases of synchronous and multiple gland involvement. Early multidisciplinary evaluation and individualized treatment planning are therefore crucial. This review aims to synthesize the presently available knowledge about synchronous multiple parathyroid carcinoma, assist clinicians with the limited data available, and discuss the main challenges in the management of this rare entity.

10 June 2025 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
ETEmanuela Traini
Emanuela Traini
ALAndrea Lanzafame
Andrea Lanzafame
GCGIULIA CARNASSALE
GIULIA CARNASSALE
GDGiuseppe Daloiso
Giuseppe Daloiso
NBNiccolò Borghesan
Niccolò Borghesan
AMAmelia Mattia
Amelia Mattia
Synchronous multiple parathyroid carcinoma (SMPC) is a rare condition within the already uncommon landscape of parathyroid malignancies, which comprise less than 1% of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (sPHP) cases. To date, only seven cases of SMPC in sPHP have been documented. This exceptional rarity complicates both the diagnostic process and therapeutic decision-making. Clinically, parathyroid carcinoma (PC) typically presents as a single mass determining severe symptoms. However, no single clinical, biochemical, or imaging feature allows for definitive preoperative diagnosis. Imaging modalities such as ultrasound (US) and Sestamibi (MIBI) scan exhibit variable sensitivity and may overlook multi-gland involvement. Histopathological examination remains the only reliable diagnostic method. Management strategies are also controversial: while some advocate for conservative surgery, en bloc resection is generally recommended for its association with improved local control and disease-free survival. Given the exceptional occurrence of SMPC, there is a lack of standardized protocols to manage PC in case of synchronous and multiple gland involvement. Early multidisciplinary evaluation and individualized treatment planning are therefore crucial. This review aims to synthesize currently available knowledge about SMPC to assist clinicians with the limited data available and guide decision-making in the management of this rare and challenging entity.

8 April 2025 in Preprints.org
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
GCGian Luigi Canu
Gian Luigi Canu
Fabio MedasFabio Medas
Fabio Medas
FCFederico Cappellacci
Federico Cappellacci
Giulia LanzollaGiulia Lanzolla
Giulia Lanzolla
Leonardo RossiLeonardo Rossi
Leonardo Rossi
Pietro Giorgio CALO'Pietro Giorgio CALO'
Pietro Giorgio CALO'
Background: Postoperative neck hematoma is an uncommon but potentially fatal complication following thyroid surgery. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of direct oral anticoagulants on the occurrence of this complication. Methods: Patients who underwent thyroidectomy, between January 2020 and December 2022, in nine high-volume thyroid surgery centers in Europe, were retrospectively evaluated. Based on taking direct oral anticoagulants, patients were divided in two groups: DOAC Group and Control Group. Propensity score matching 1:1 was performed between the two groups, which were then compared through univariate analysis. Results: Patients enrolled based on inclusion/exclusion criteria were 8985. Following propensity score matching, the study population consisted of 316 patients: 158 in DOAC Group and 158 in Control Group. In DOAC Group, the overall incidence of neck hematoma was 5.70% (4.43% for neck hematomas managed conservatively, and 1.27% for those that required surgical revision of hemostasis). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of incidence of this complication. Readmission for neck hematoma was not observed in any patient. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of timing of onset of neck hematomas that required surgical revision of hemostasis. Conclusions: This study showed that, in the field of thyroid surgery, direct oral anticoagulants have no impact on the occurrence of postoperative neck hematoma. Therefore, based on our findings, it can be concluded that thyroidectomy can be safely performed in patients taking this class of drugs.