Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prevalent conditions with overlapping clinical features and shared consequences on autonomic function. Heart rate variability (HRV), a non-invasive biomarker of autonomic nervous system activity, may offer diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic insights in this patient population. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE to identify peer-reviewed English-language studies published between January 2015 and December 2024. Studies were included if they evaluated HRV parameters in individuals with OSA, COPD, or overlap syndrome, explored HRV as a marker of disease severity or progression. A total of 239 studies were identified; after screening, 41 met the inclusion criteria. Results: The analysis revealed consistent evidence linking reduced HRV with both OSA and COPD severity. HRV alterations were more pronounced in overlap syndrome, reflecting synergistic autonomic dysfunction. HRV showed potential in differentiating disease stages, predicting cardiovascular risk, and evaluating treatment efficacy, particularly for CPAP therapy in OSA. Short-term HRV was particularly sensitive to autonomic changes, while long-term recordings helped track disease progression. Emerging evidence supports the use of HRV derived from wearable technologies as a viable screening tool for health and wellness. Conclusion: HRV is a valuable, non-invasive tool for assessing autonomic dysfunction in OSA, COPD, and their overlap. It offers significant potential for early diagnosis, disease monitoring, and treatment evaluation. Integrating HRV into clinical practice, could enhance diagnostic efficiency, reduce healthcare burden, and improve outcomes in high-risk respiratory populations. Furthermore, longitudinal studies are warranted to standardise HRV thresholds and validate their use in routine screening protocols.

Regular and unobstructed breathing during the night is the prerequisite for an undisturbed and restful sleep. The most prevalent nocturnal breathing disturbance with morbid consequences is obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. The prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is increasing, and a significant number of patients with OSA are undiagnosed. On the other hand, the “obesity epidemic” is a growing concern globally. A sleep test is required to diagnose sleep apnea and to individualize therapy. A multidisciplinary approach is the key to success. This narrative review presents a debate on whether surgery is a friend or a foe in the treatment of sleep apnea. Depending on the type and severity of the apnea, the causal factor, and the presence of obesity and hypercapnia as well as the associated pathologies, the optimal therapeutic method is determined for each individual case. The article concludes that each case is unique, and there is no ideal method. Positive pressure ventilation, although a therapeutic gold standard, has its disadvantages extensively discussed in this paper. Nevertheless, it is necessary prior to any surgical intervention, either for the curative treatment of the causal factor of apnea or for elective surgery for another condition. The anesthetic risks associated with the presence of apnea and obesity should not be neglected and should form the basis for decision making regarding surgical interventions for the treatment of sleep apnea.

Introduction: Smoking among diabetic patients amplifies the risk of cardiovascular morbidity as well as total mortality. Supporting smoking cessation is an important component of clinical diabetes care. Aim: To examine the real world effectiveness of the 2017 Specialized Tobacco Cessation Guidelines for High-risk Groups (TOB-G) recommendations among a sample of patients with Type II diabetes or pre-diabetes. Methods: A pre-post pilot study was conducted among patients with diabetes or pre-diabetes with current tobacco use willing to quit smoking. Participants received a face-to-face counselling session at baseline and three telephone counselling sessions at 1, 2, and 6 months from a trained health care professional. The primary outcome measure was point prevalence smoking abstinence measured at 1, 2 and 6-months. Results: Fifty patients (59.2% male; mean age 46.8 SD±15.8; 51% pre-diabetics) participated in the pilot study (one died). Table 1 summarizes smoking status at 1, 2 and 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: Employing the TOB-G evidence-based tobacco treatment recommendations among a sample of diabetic and pre-diabetes patients was associated with important changes to smoking status.