Héctor Jorquera

Dr. Héctor Jorquera

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2021 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MVMargareth Viecco
Margareth Viecco
HJHéctor Jorquera
Héctor Jorquera
Ashish SharmaAshish Sharma
Ashish Sharma
WBWaldo Bustamante
Waldo Bustamante
HFHarindra Fernando
Harindra Fernando
SVSergio Vera
Sergio Vera

1 December 2015 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBClaudio Belis
Claudio Belis
FKFederico Karagulian
Federico Karagulian
FAFulvio Amato
Fulvio Amato
SASusana Marta Almeida
Susana Marta Almeida
Paulo ArtaxoPaulo Artaxo
Paulo Artaxo
PHPhilip K. Hopke
Philip K. Hopke
The performance and the uncertainty of receptor models (RMs) were assessed in intercomparison exercises employing real-world and synthetic input datasets. To that end, the results obtained by different practitioners using ten different RMs were compared with a reference. In order to explain the differences in the performances and uncertainties of the different approaches, the apportioned mass, the number of sources, the chemical profiles, the contribution-to-species and the time trends of the sources were all evaluated using the methodology described in Belis et al. (2015). In this study, 87% of the 344 source contribution estimates (SCEs) reported by participants in 47 different source apportionment model results met the 50% standard uncertainty quality objective established for the performance test. In addition, 68% of the SCE uncertainties reported in the results were coherent with the analytical uncertainties in the input data. The most used models, EPA-PMF v.3, PMF2 and EPA-CMB 8.2, presented quite satisfactory performances in the estimation of SCEs while unconstrained models, that do not account for the uncertainty in the input data (e.g. APCS and FA-MLRA), showed below average performance. Sources with well-defined chemical profiles and seasonal time trends, that make appreciable contributions (>10%), were those better quantified by the models while those with contributions to the PM mass close to 1% represented a challenge. The results of the assessment indicate that RMs are capable of estimating the contribution of the major pollution source categories over a given time window with a level of accuracy that is in line with the needs of air quality management.JRC.H.2-Air and Climat

12 July 2018 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MVMargareth Viecco
Margareth Viecco
Sergio VeraSergio Vera
Sergio Vera
HJHéctor Jorquera
Héctor Jorquera
WBWaldo Bustamante
Waldo Bustamante
Jorge GironásJorge Gironás
Jorge Gironás
ELEduardo Leiva
Eduardo Leiva
In the last two decades, the incorporation of green roofs and living walls in buildings has increased significantly worldwide because of their benefits such as building energy savings, promoting biodiversity, controlling water run-off, mitigating urban heat island effect, improving indoor and urban air quality, and connecting people with nature. However, few studies have quantified the impact of green roofs (GRs) and living walls (LWs) on mitigating air pollution, especially in semiarid climates where airborne particle matter (PM) levels are high. Therefore, the aim of this paper is quantifying the dry deposition of PM10 and PM2.5 by several vegetation species commonly used in GRs and LWs in semiarid climates. Five species (Pitosporumtobira, Lavandulaangustifolia, Lampranthusspectabillis, Sedumalbum, and Sedumreflexum) for GRs and four species (Apteniacordiflora, Erigeronkarvinskianus, Sedumpalmeri, and Sedumspuriump.) for LWs were tested in an experimental facility—through washing, filtering, and weighing—to quantify the dry deposition of PM2.5 and PM10 on vegetation leaves as well as PM captured by the leaf wax. The main result is that a significant amount of PM is deposited on the typical vegetation used in GRs and LWs in semiarid climates. However, large differences in PM dry deposition were found among species, ranging from 0.09 μg/cm2∙h−1 to 1.32 μg/cm2∙h−1 for PM2.5, 0.48 μg/cm2∙h−1 to 4.7 μg/cm2∙h−1 for PM10 and 0.41 μg/cm2∙h−1 to 25.6 μg/cm2∙h−1 for leaf wax. The species that showed the highest potential to capture PM were S. album, S. reflexum, S. palmeri, and L. spectabillis. This study shows this green infrastructures can contribute to mitigate air pollution, thus GRs and LWs have the potential for being included in decontamination plans.

1 April 2015 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AVAna M. Villalobos
Ana M. Villalobos
Francisco BarrazaFrancisco Barraza
Francisco Barraza
HJHéctor Jorquera
Héctor Jorquera
JSJames J. Schauer
James J. Schauer

1 August 2004 in Atmospheric Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HJHéctor Jorquera
Héctor Jorquera
BRBernhard Rappenglück
Bernhard Rappenglück

1 January 2020 in Atmospheric Environment: X
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CBC.A. Belis
C.A. Belis
DPD. Pernigotti
D. Pernigotti
GPGuido Pirovano
Guido Pirovano
OFO. Favez
O. Favez
JJJ.L. Jaffrezo
J.L. Jaffrezo
EYE. Yubero
E. Yubero