Zheniskul Zeineshovna Zhantassova

Prof. Zheniskul Zeineshovna Zhantassova


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 May 2025 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDmitry Chernykh,
Dmitry Chernykh,
RBRoman Biryukov
Roman Biryukov
ABAndrej A. Bondarovich
Andrej A. Bondarovich
LLLilia Lubenets
Lilia Lubenets
APAnatoliy Vladimirovich Pavlenko
Anatoliy Vladimirovich Pavlenko
ZZZheniskul Zeineshovna Zhantassova
Zheniskul Zeineshovna Zhantassova
The study of the hydrological regimes of rivers in different regions of the globe has revealed the need to include the soil moisture content in flood prediction models. This paper investigates the nature of the dependence of soil moisture content on soil texture in the East Kazakhstan region. Data from ERA-5-land reanalysis, soil maps, hydrogeological maps, and the meteorological data of Kazhydromet were used. The years for analysis were selected due to their different moisture conditions. This study analyzed soil moisture within the root zone (0–28 cm depth). A JavaScript-based algorithm was developed in Google Earth Engine to analyze soil moisture and total precipitation across five Soil Texture Index categories during the growing seasons (April–September) of 2013, 2022, and 2023. Final cartographic processing and spatial distribution analysis were conducted using ESRI ArcGIS Pro 3.3. The study of soil moisture’s relationship with different soil textures in the East Kazakhstan region has revealed several key trends. The maximum values of soil moisture for each texture class change very slightly from year to year. The minimum soil moisture values fluctuate more strongly from year to year. The regression analysis demonstrates a statistically significant relationship between precipitation and soil moisture. The best performance is achieved when using a 1-day lag for 2013 and varying optimal lags for 2022 and 2023 (ranging from 1 to 3 days) during the high-precipitation period (months 6–9), with filtering applied to remove days with negligible rainfall.

5 August 2026 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCDmitry Chernykh,
Dmitry Chernykh,
RBRoman Biryukov
Roman Biryukov
ABAndrej A. Bondarovich
Andrej A. Bondarovich
LLLilia Lubenets
Lilia Lubenets
Anar RakhimzhanovaAnar Rakhimzhanova
Anar Rakhimzhanova
ZZZheniskul Zeineshovna Zhantassova
Zheniskul Zeineshovna Zhantassova
Existing hydrologic landscape classifications, such as Hydrologic Landscape Regions (HLRs) and Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs), group catchments by similarity of climate, geology, and topography, but do not directly link this classification to runoff-generation function, limiting their use for ranking hydrological activity in data-sparse mountain regions. The concept of a landscape–hydrological background, integrating climatic–hydrological, soil–hydrological, and topo–hydrological components, was used as the basis for a classification framework applied to 15 model catchments in the East Kazakhstan Region. The proposed approach provides a functional representation of landscape organization by linking environmental characteristics directly to runoff-generation processes and hydrological activity. The analysis revealed two distinct hydrological domains: a runoff-generating mountain domain (Bukhtarma, Uba, and Ulba), where highly active hydrological landscapes occupy 55.2–63.9% of the catchment area, and a transitional mountain-foothill domain (Narym, Kurchum, and Kalzhyr), where their share decreases to 18.0–25.4%. The highest landscape diversity, with Shannon indices of 1.31–1.53, occurs in the transitional catchments, reflecting the most balanced combination of functional groups. This study demonstrates that hydrological activity is controlled by the combined influences of catchment size, relief differentiation, and the spatial extent of high-mountain environments rather than by elevation alone. The proposed framework has practical applications for watershed management, water resources planning, environmental monitoring, and climate change adaptation, and is particularly valuable for data-sparse mountain regions.