Mingxing Xu

Dr. Mingxing Xu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

12 April 2021 in Environmental Earth Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MXMingxing Xu
Mingxing Xu
XCXianyao Chu
Xianyao Chu
YFYesi Fu
Yesi Fu
CWChangjiang Wang
Changjiang Wang
SWShaohua Wu
Shaohua Wu

9 October 2023 in Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MXMingxing Xu
Mingxing Xu
YFYesi Fu
Yesi Fu
WPWeifeng Pan
Weifeng Pan
GZGuohua Zhou
Guohua Zhou
WSWenming Sun
Wenming Sun

3 February 2026 in Journal of Hazardous Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TZTing Zhu
Ting Zhu
Zhenyi JiaZhenyi Jia
Zhenyi Jia
XCXiaolei Chen
Xiaolei Chen
XSXiaoyi Shi
Xiaoyi Shi
SWShaohua Wu
Shaohua Wu
MXMingxing Xu
Mingxing Xu

15 April 2025 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JFJiawen Fan
Jiawen Fan
GZGuanghui Zheng
Guanghui Zheng
CJCaixia Jiao
Caixia Jiao
RZRong Zeng
Rong Zeng
YZYujie Zhou
Yujie Zhou
CZChengyi Zhao
Chengyi Zhao
Soil organic carbon density (SOCD) is crucial for assessing soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, but its estimation remains challenging when bulk density (BD) data are unavailable. Traditional methods for substituting missing BD data, including using the mean, median, and pedotransfer functions (PTFs), introduce varying degrees of uncertainty in SOCD estimation: (1) The mean and median methods ignore the effects of soil type, environmental conditions, and land use changes on BD. They also heavily rely on the representativeness of soil samples, which may lead to systematic bias. (2) The accuracy of PTFs depends on modeling approaches, variable selection, and dataset characteristics, and differences among PTFs may introduce estimation biases in SOCD. To overcome this challenge, we analyzed 443 soil profiles from the Yangtze River Delta region of China and developed an innovative approach that estimates SOCD using only SOC and gravel content data. By formulating linear, polynomial, and power function regression models, we directly estimated SOCD per centimeter of soil horizon i (SOCDicm) under conditions with and without available gravel content data, followed by SOCD calculation. The results indicated a strong correlation between SOC and SOCDicm, with the three function models for direct SOC-based SOCDicm estimation yielding consistently high accuracy. Neglecting gravel content overall resulted in the overestimation of SOCDicm by 7.01–9.45%. After incorporating gravel content as a correction factor, the accuracy of the new method for estimating SOCD was improved, with the prediction set achieving R² values of 0.927–0.945, an RMSE of 0.819–0.949 kg m−2, and an RPIQ of 4.773–5.533. The accuracy of estimating SOCD surpassed that of the BD mean and median methods and was comparable to that of the PTF method, thus enabling reliable SOCD estimation. This study introduces an innovative approach by developing regional models to estimate SOCDicm, enabling rapid SOCD estimation for samples with missing BD information in historical data, and provides a new methodology for calculating regional and global SOC stocks. This study contributes to improving the accuracy of soil carbon stock estimation, supporting land management and carbon cycle research, and providing scientific evidence for sustainable agricultural development and climate change mitigation strategies.

1 July 2013
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MXMingxing Xu
Mingxing Xu
WPWei-Feng Pan
Wei-Feng Pan
JCJing Ceng
Jing Ceng
XMXue-Wen Ma
Xue-Wen Ma