Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an escalating global health burden, with a disproportionate impact on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although tobacco smoking is a well-established risk factor, emerging evidence highlights the significant role of non-smoking exposure in driving the prevalence of COPD in these regions. This narrative review synthesizes current data on key non-smoking contributors, including household air pollution, ambient urban pollution, occupational exposure, early-life respiratory insults, chronic infections, and socioeconomic adversity. These risk factors are associated with distinct COPD phenotypes, often marked by increased airway inflammation, reduced emphysema, and variable airflow limitation. Such presentations are particularly common among women and younger populations in LMICs. However, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges persist, owing to limited disease awareness, under-resourced health systems, restricted access to essential medications, and financial constraints impacting adherence. Despite the proven effectiveness of non-pharmacological measures and public health interventions, their implementation remains inadequate because of infrastructural and funding limitations. Bridging these gaps requires region-specific clinical guidelines, improved diagnostic infrastructure, expanded access to affordable treatment, and culturally sensitive interventions. Future priorities include identifying robust biomarkers, refining disease definitions to accommodate non-smoking phenotypes, and advancing implementation science to improve interventions. A coordinated, context-aware global response is essential to reduce the growing burden of COPD in LMICs and to ensure equitable respiratory health outcomes.

Background and Clinical Significance: Acute pediatric rhinosinusitis is most commonly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. Involvement of Enterobacter species is rare and typically linked to chronic or nosocomial infections. Typical cases of acute rhinosinusitis in children present with abundant nasal discharge, headache, and fever, and are generally managed with systemic antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), mucolytics, and topical intranasal treatment. Atypical presentations prompt for heightened clinical attention and, depending on the symptoms and patient status, surgical interventions might be considered; Case Presentation: We report the case of a previously healthy 5-year-old boy presenting with painful unilateral palpebral edema, minimal ipsilateral nasal discharge and persistent headache despite standard rhinosinusitis therapy. Imaging revealed complete right maxillary sinus opacification. As clinical response to ceftriaxone and dexamethasone was minimal, we opted for endoscopic sinus surgery. A nasal swab culture identified Enterobacter spp. in the nasal discharge; Conclusions: Unusual pathogens like Enterobacter spp. can cause acute sinusitis in children without prior risk factors. Early surgical intervention and culture-adjusted antimicrobial therapy remain critical for favorable outcomes.

Background and Clinical Significance: Acute pediatric rhinosinusitis is most commonly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis. The involvement of Enterobacter species is rare and typically linked to chronic or nosocomial infections. Typical cases of acute rhinosinusitis in children present with abundant nasal discharge, headache, and fever and are generally managed with systemic antibiotics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), mucolytics, and topical intranasal treatment. Atypical presentations prompt heightened clinical attention, and depending on the symptoms and patient status, surgical interventions might be considered. Case Presentation: We report the case of a previously healthy 5-year-old boy presenting with painful unilateral palpebral edema, minimal ipsilateral nasal discharge, and persistent headache despite standard rhinosinusitis therapy. Imaging tests revealed complete right maxillary sinus opacification. As the clinical response to ceftriaxone and dexamethasone was minimal, we opted for endoscopic sinus surgery. A nasal swab culture identified Enterobacter spp. in the nasal discharge. Conclusions: Unusual pathogens like Enterobacter spp. can cause acute sinusitis in children without prior risk factors. Early surgical intervention and culture-adjusted antimicrobial therapy remain critical for favorable outcomes.

Background: Digital health technologies have expanded access to home fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring devices, enabling fetal surveillance outside clinical settings. However, evidence on women’s awareness, acceptance, and experiences with these devices remains limited. Objective: To assess awareness, adoption, user experience, perceived reassurance, and attitudes toward home FHR monitoring among pregnant and postpartum women. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire distributed via Google Forms. Eligible participants were women aged ≥18 years who were currently pregnant or had been pregnant within the previous two years. The survey evaluated awareness and use of home FHR monitoring devices, usage patterns, sources of recommendation and instruction, emotional responses, perceived reassurance, mobile application integration, and overall attitudes. Descriptive statistics and exploratory subgroup analyses were performed. Results: A total of 225 women completed the survey; 166 (73.8%) reported using a home FHR monitoring device during pregnancy. Most users reported positive emotional experiences, with calmness as the most common response. Home monitoring was generally perceived as reassuring, and many participants felt calmer on days of device use. Gynecologists were the primary source of device recommendations and usage instructions. Participants highlighted the importance of professional guidance, clear instructions, and mobile application support. Primiparous women had significantly higher adoption rates than multiparous women (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Home FHR monitoring was widely accepted and commonly perceived as reassuring. These devices may support patient-centered prenatal care when accompanied by appropriate professional guidance. Further prospective studies are needed to assess their clinical utility, safety, and integration into prenatal care pathways.