Objective: Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have anticolorectal cancer (CRC) activity. The intestinal microbiota has been implicated in colorectal carcinogenesis. Dietary omega-3 PUFAs alter the mouse intestinal microbiome compatible with antineoplastic activity. Therefore, we investigated the effect of omega-3 PUFA supplements on the faecal microbiome in middle-aged, healthy volunteers (n=22). Design: A randomised, open-label, cross-over trial of 8 weeks’ treatment with 4 g mixed eicosapentaenoic acid/docosahexaenoic acid in two formulations (soft-gel capsules and Smartfish drinks), separated by a 12-week ‘washout’ period. Faecal samples were collected at five time-points for microbiome analysis by 16S ribosomal RNA PCR and Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Red blood cell (RBC) fatty acid analysis was performed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Results: Both omega-3 PUFA formulations induced similar changes in RBC fatty acid content, except that drinks were associated with a larger, and more prolonged, decrease in omega-6 PUFA arachidonic acid than the capsule intervention (p=0.02). There were no significant changes in α or β diversity, or phyla composition, associated with omega-3 PUFA supplementation. However, a reversible increased abundance of several genera, including Bifidobacterium , Roseburia and Lactobacillus was observed with one or both omega-3 PUFA interventions. Microbiome changes did not correlate with RBC omega-3 PUFA incorporation or development of omega-3 PUFA-induced diarrhoea. There were no treatment order effects. Conclusion: Omega-3 PUFA supplementation induces a reversible increase in several short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria, independently of the method of administration. There is no simple relationship between the intestinal microbiome and systemic omega-3 PUFA exposure. Trial registration number: ISRCTN18662143.

Adoption of new technology in both basic research and clinical settings requires rigorous validation of analytical performance. The OncoScan® FFPE Assay is a multiplexing tool that offers genome-wide copy number and loss of heterozygosity detection, as well as identification of frequently tested somatic mutations. In this study, 162 formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples, representing six different tumour types, were profiled in triplicate across three independent laboratories. OncoScan® formalin fixed paraffin embedded assay data was then analysed for reproducibility of genome-wide copy number, loss of heterozygosity and somatic mutations. Where available, somatic mutation data was compared to data from orthogonal technologies (pyro/sanger sequencing). Cross site comparisons of genome-wide copy number and loss of heterozygosity profiles showed greater than 95% average agreement between sites. Somatic mutations pre-validated by orthogonal technologies showed greater than 90% agreement with OncoScan® somatic mutation calls and somatic mutation concordance between sites averaged 97%. Reproducibility of whole-genome copy number, loss of heterozygosity and somatic mutation data using the OncoScan® assay has been demonstrated with comparatively low DNA inputs from a range of highly degraded formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples. In addition, our data shows examples of clinically-relevant aberrations that demonstrate the potential utility of the OncoScan® assay as a robust clinical tool for guiding tumour therapy.

Marine mammal foraging grounds are popular focal points for marine protected area (MPA) implementation, despite being temporally dynamic, requiring continuous monitoring to infer prey availability and abundance. Marine mammal distributions are assumed to be driven by their prey in foraging areas, but limited understanding of prey distributions often prevents us from exploring how shifting prey availability impacts both seasonal and long‐term marine mammal distributions. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding could enhance the understanding of marine mammal habitat use in relation to their prey through simultaneous monitoring of both. However, eDNA applications focused on marine mammals or predator–prey dynamics have been limited to date. In this study, we assess spatiotemporal changes in the distribution and abundance of cetaceans, minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata), bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) and harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in relation to key prey species in a newly established MPA, employing eDNA metabarcoding. We recovered 105 molecular operational taxonomic units (OTUs) from marine vertebrates using two primer sets targeting 12S and 16S genes, along with 112 OTUs from a broader eukaryotic primer set targeting 18S rRNA. Overall, key forage fish prey species, sandeels and clupeids, were the most abundant teleost fishes detected, although their availability varied temporally and with distance from shore. We also found clear spatial partitioning between coastal bottlenose dolphins and the more pelagic minke whales and harbor porpoises, paralleling availability of their main prey species. Other species of conservation interest were also detected including the critically endangered European eel (Anguilla anguilla), Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus), and the invasive pink salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha). This study demonstrates the application of eDNA to detect spatiotemporal trends in the occurrence and abundance of cetacean predators and their prey, furthering our understanding of fine‐scale habitat use within MPAs. Future long‐term monitoring of predator–prey dynamics with eDNA could improve our ability to predict climate‐induced shifts in foraging grounds and enhance rapid responses with appropriate management actions.

Introduction RPGR ORF15 is an exon present almost exclusively in the retinal transcript of RPGR. It is purine-rich, repetitive and notoriously hard to sequence, but is a hotspot for mutations causing X-linked retinitis pigmentosa. Methods Long-read nanopore sequencing on MinION and Flongle flow cells was used to sequence RPGR ORF15 in genomic DNA from patients with inherited retinal dystrophy. A flow cell wash kit was used on a MinION flow cell to increase yield. Findings were confirmed by PacBio SMRT long-read sequencing. Results We showed that long-read nanopore sequencing successfully reads through a 2 kb PCR-amplified fragment containing ORF15. We generated reads of sufficient quality and cumulative read-depth to detect pathogenic RP-causing variants. However, we observed that this G-rich, repetitive DNA segment rapidly blocks the available pores, resulting in sequence yields less than 5% of the expected output. This limited the extent to which samples could be pooled, increasing cost. We tested the utility of a MinION wash kit containing DNase I to digest DNA fragments remaining on the flow cell, regenerating the pores. Use of the DNase I treatment allowed repeated re-loading, increasing the sequence reads obtained. Our customised workflow was used to screen pooled amplification products from previously unsolved inherited retinal disease (IRD) in patients, identifying two new cases with pathogenic ORF15 variants. Discussion We report the novel finding that long-read nanopore sequencing can read through RPGR-ORF15, a DNA sequence not captured by short-read next-generation sequencing (NGS), but with a more reduced yield. Use of a flow cell wash kit containing DNase I unblocks the pores, allowing reloading of further library aliquots over a 72-h period, increasing yield. The workflow we describe provides a novel solution to the need for a rapid, robust, scalable, cost-effective ORF15 screening protocol.

The importance of accurate and affordable mutation calling in fixed pathology samples is becoming increasingly important as we move into the era of personalised medicine. The Affymetrix OncoScan® Array platform is designed to produce actionable mutation calls in archival material. We compared calls made using the OncoScan platform with calls made using a custom designed PCR panel followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS), in order to benchmark the sensitivity and specificity of the OncoScan calls in a large cohort of fixed tumour samples. 392 fixed, clinical samples were sequenced, encompassing 641 PCR regions, 403 putative positive calls and 1528 putative negative calls. A small number of mutations could not be validated, either due to large indels or pseudogenes impairing parts of the NGS pipeline. For the remainder, if calls were filtered according to simple quality metrics, both sensitivity and specificity for the OncoScan platform were over 98%. This applied even to samples with poorer sample quality and lower variant allele frequency (5–10%) than product claims indicated. This benchmarking study will be useful to users and potential users of this platform, who wish to compare technologies or interpret their own results.

Background: Whilst RAS mutations predict which aCRC patients (pts) will not benefit from anti-EGFR agents, RAS-wt status does not reliably predict who will. Several studies report that high EGFR ligand expression (EREG/AREG) is predictive of anti-EGFR agent benefit but progression towards clinical utility is limited by lack of consensus on a clinical dichotomisation point and additional tumor material required. Here we explore EGFR copy number as a biomarker of prognosis and predictor of Pan benefit in a randomised trial in aCRC.