Stick balancing on the fingertip is a complex voluntary motor task that requires the stabilization of an unstable system. For seated expert stick balancers, the time delay is 0.23 s, the shortest stick that can be balanced for 240 s is 0.32 m and there is a ° dead zone for the estimation of the vertical displacement angle in the saggital plane. These observations motivate a switching-type, pendulum–cart model for balance control which uses an internal model to compensate for the time delay by predicting the sensory consequences of the stick's movements. Numerical simulations using the semi-discretization method suggest that the feedback gains are tuned near the edge of stability. For these choices of the feedback gains, the cost function which takes into account the position of the fingertip and the corrective forces is minimized. Thus, expert stick balancers optimize control with a combination of quick manoeuvrability and minimum energy expenditures.

The causes of falling in the elderly are multi-factorial. Three factors that influence balance stability are the time delay, a sensory dead zone and the maximum ankle torque that can be generated by muscular contraction. Here, the effects of these contributions are evaluated in the context of a model of an inverted pendulum stabilized by time-delayed proportional–derivative (PD) feedback. The effect of the sensory dead zone is to produce a hybrid type of control in which the PD feedback is switched ON or OFF depending on whether or not the controlled variable is larger or smaller than the detection threshold, Π . It is shown that, as Π increases, the region in the plane of control parameters where the balance time (BT) is greater than 60 s is increased slightly. However, when maximum ankle torque is also limited, there is a dramatic increase in the parameter region associated with BTs greater than 60 s. This increase is due to the effects of a torque limitation on over-control associated with bang-bang type switching controllers. These observations show that acting together influences, which are typically thought to destabilize balance, can actually stabilize balance. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Nonlinear dynamics of delay systems’.

Understanding how dexterity improves with practice is a fundamental challenge of motor control and neurorehabilitation. Here we investigate a ball and beam implementation of a dexterity puzzle in which subjects stabilize a ball at the mid-point of a beam by manipulating the angular position of the beam. Stabilizability analysis of different biomechanical models for the ball and beam task with time-delayed proportional-derivative feedback identified the angular position of the beam as the manipulated variable. Consequently, we monitored the changes in the dynamics with learning by measuring changes in the control parameters. Two types of stable motion are possible: node type (nonoscillatory) and spiral type (oscillatory). Both types of motion are observed experimentally and correspond to well-defined regions in the parameter space of the control gains. With practice the control gains for each subject move close to or on the portion of the boundary which separates the node-type and spiral-type solutions and which is associated with the rightmost characteristic exponent of smallest real part. These observations suggest that with learning the control gains for ball and beam balancing change in such a way that minimizes overshoot and the settling time. This study provides an example of how mathematical analysis together with careful experimental observations can shed light onto the early stages of skill acquisition. Since the difficulty of this task depends on the length of the beam, ball and beam balancing tasks may be useful for the rehabilitation of children with dyspraxia and those recovering from a stroke.

A new mathematical model for biological rhythms in the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis is proposed. This model takes the form of a system of impulsive time-delay differential equations which include pulsatile release of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) by the pituitary gland and a time delay for the release of glucocorticoid hormones by the adrenal gland. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the model’s response to periodic and circadian inputs from the hypothalamus are consistent with those generated by recent models which do not include a pulsatile pituitary. In contrast the oscillatory phenomena generated by the impulsive delay equation mode occur even if the time delay is zero. The observation that the time delay merely introduces a small phase shift suggesting that the effects of the adrenal gland are “downstream” to the origin of pulsativity. In addition, the model accounts for the occurrence of ultradian oscillations in an isolated pituitary gland. These observations suggest that principles of pulse modulated control, familiar to control engineers, may have an increasing role to play in understanding the HPA axis.

The concept of Dynamical Diseases provides a framework to understand physiological control systems in pathological states due to their operating in an abnormal range of control parameters: this allows for the possibility of a return to normal condition by a redress of the values of the governing parameters. The analogy with bifurcations in dynamical systems opens the possibility of mathematically modeling clinical conditions and investigating possible parameter changes that lead to avoidance of their pathological states. Since its introduction, this concept has been applied to a number of physiological systems, most notably cardiac, hematological, and neurological. A quarter century after the inaugural meeting on dynamical diseases held in Mont Tremblant, Québec [Bélair et al., Dynamical Diseases: Mathematical Analysis of Human Illness (American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY, 1995)], this Focus Issue offers an opportunity to reflect on the evolution of the field in traditional areas as well as contemporary data-based methods.