Proper blood collection and timely analysis are vital steps for reliable results. This study aims to compare potassium(K), calcium(Ca), and phosphorus(P) concentrations in serum separator tube (SST), lithium heparin tube without gel (LiH), and lithium heparin tube with a barrier (Barricor)tubes in essential thrombocytosis(ET) patients. Additionally, we assessed short-term stability of these analytes at room temperature. K, Ca and P concentrations of blood taken from 40 ET patients into SST, LiH and Barricor tubes were measured at 0, 2, 4 and 8 h. We calculated the percentage difference and defined the maximum permissible difference (MPD) using the Biological Variation Database. Intertube comparisons were conducted using Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman analysis. Comparing SST to LiH, the percentage difference values for all tests exceeded the MPD. When comparing Barricor to LiH, K and Ca tests were above MPD, except for P. At the 8th hour, LiH showed clinically significant changes in all three electrolytes. Barricor exhibited stability for K, Ca, and P for up to 8 h, with only Ca levels borderline higher than the MPD. Our study reveals clinically significant alterations in K, Ca, and P concentrations in SST compared to LiH tubes, and in K and Ca concentrations in Barricor compared to LiH tubes. While K, Ca and P concentrations were stable for up to 4 h at room temperature in all tube types tested, significant changes were observed in all electrolytes at 8 h in the LiH tube.

Background: Leucine rich α-2 glycoprotein (LRG) is a glycoprotein that is an acute-phase protein produced by neutrophils, macrophages, hepatocytes, and intestinal epithelial cells. This study aimed to determine the serum LRG (s-LRG) and urine LRG (u-LRG) expression levels in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and evaluated their correlation with clinical disease activity, other inflammatory markers, laboratory results, and endoscopic activity scoring. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary centre and included children aged 2–18 years with IBD. Clinic activity scoring was used to assess clinical disease activity. Haemoglobin levels, platelet counts, albumin, C-reactive protein, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were analysed in the blood sample. LRG levels were measured in both blood and urine samples. The endoscopic assessment was scored according to the simple endoscopic score and Mayo endoscopic score. Serum and urine LRG levels were measured using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Disease activation was defined based on clinical activity scoring, laboratory results, and endoscopic evaluation. The results were compared between the active IBD and remission groups. Results: Forty-two (50%) patients with active IBD and forty-two (50%) patients in remission were included in this study. The serum levels of LRG were elevated in the patients with active IBD compared with the levels in the patients with IBD in remission (p = 0.020). However, there was no difference in the u-LRG level between the two groups (p = 0.407). In patients with IBD, positive correlations were observed between s-LRG, platelet count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The serum LRG was negatively correlated with albumin and haemoglobin levels. Urine LRG was not correlated with s-LRG in any patients with IBD included or in patients with active IBD. The cutoff value for s- LRG (77.03 μg/mL) had a sensitivity and specificity of 40.4% (95% CI 25.6–56.7%) and 88.1% (95% CI 74.3–96.0%), respectively. It was found that s-LRG was a more significant parameter than CRP in predicting disease activation. Conclusions: This prospective study demonstrated that the s-LRG level is a useful biomarker for predicting disease activation in children with IBD and appears to be a more significant parameter than the CRP level. However, the u-LRG level is not effective in predicting disease activation in children with IBD.

Objectives: We aimed to investigate the prevalence of JAK2-V617F mutation and its association with hematologic parameters in polycythemia vera(PV), essential thrombocytosis(ET) and primary myelofibrosis(PMF) patients who have been tested for the mutation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 168 patients (82 males and 86 females) who were tested for JAK2-V617F mutation upon request of Hematology Clinic. JAK2-V617F mutation status, white blood cell (WBC) counts, platelet (PLT) counts, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct) levels and demographics of the patients were recorded. Results: JAK2-V617F mutation was detected in 55.9% of the 168 patients. The mutation was observed in 58.2% of PV cases, in 54.4% of ET and in 54.5% of PMF cases. All patients were divided into two groups: mutation positive and negative. Age, WBC and PLT levels were significantly higher in mutation positive group (p<0.05). Age, WBC, Hb, Hct and PLT counts in PV cases with JAK2-V617F mutation, age and WBC counts in PMF cases with JAK2-V617F mutation were found to be significantly higher compared to mutation negative patients (p<0.05). Conclusion: JAK2-V617F mutation is a very important parameter in diagnostic and prognostic evaluation. Thus, every patient suspected of having a myeloproliferative neoplasm should be screened for JAK2-V617F mutation.