Background: Juvenile scleroderma (JS) comprises a group of rare chronic autoimmune and fibrosing disorders in children, primarily presenting as juvenile localized scleroderma (jLS) or juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSS). While jLS predominantly affects the skin and subcutaneous tissues, jSS may involve multiple internal organs and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Due to the scarcity of pediatric-specific clinical trials, the current treatment strategies are largely empirical and often adapted from adult protocols. Objective: This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive update on emerging systemic therapies for juvenile scleroderma, focusing on biologics, small molecule inhibitors, and advanced cellular interventions, to support the development of more personalized and effective pediatric treatment approaches. Methods: A literature search was conducted through PubMed and a manual bibliographic review, covering publications from 2001 to 2024. Only English-language studies involving pediatric populations were included, comprising randomized controlled trials, reviews, and case reports. Additional searches were performed for drugs that are specifically used in juvenile scleroderma. Results: Biologic agents such as tocilizumab, rituximab, and abatacept, along with small molecules including Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors and imatinib, have demonstrated potential in managing refractory cases by reducing skin fibrosis and pulmonary involvement. Novel approaches—such as pamrevlumab, nintedanib, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T) cell therapy—target fibrotic and autoimmune pathways but remain investigational in children. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has also been explored in severe, treatment-resistant cases, although data are extremely limited. The overall evidence base is constrained by small sample sizes, a lack of controlled pediatric trials, and reliance on adult extrapolation. Conclusions: While innovative systemic therapies show promise for juvenile scleroderma, their widespread clinical application remains limited by insufficient pediatric-specific evidence. Large, multicenter, long-term trials are urgently needed to establish safety, efficacy, and optimal treatment algorithms that are tailored to the pediatric population.

Background: Appropriateness of diagnostic test prescriptions represents a critical component of quality care in pediatric allergology, directly influencing diagnostic accuracy, therapeutic decisions, healthcare resource utilization, and patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary expert panel was convened to develop evidence-based clinical recommendations addressing the appropriate use of specialist consultations and diagnostic investigations in children with asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC). Methods: Clinical questions were formulated using the PICO framework and prioritized through structured expert consensus. Systematic literature reviews were conducted across major databases, and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Results: Specialist evaluation emerged as a key determinant of improved diagnostic precision, optimization of treatment strategies, and reduction of inappropriate therapies. In asthma, spirometry, FeNO measurement, and allergy testing contributed to enhanced diagnostic accuracy and better control. In allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, allergological assessment supported diagnosis and the selection of immunotherapy, with demonstrated benefits on symptoms and quality of life. For VKC, multidisciplinary specialist involvement facilitated early diagnosis, personalized management, and prevention of complications. Conclusions: Although the overall certainty of evidence ranged from moderate to low, consistent clinical benefits supported consensus-based recommendations. Implementation of these recommendations may improve care quality, promote equitable access to diagnostic resources, and reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization.