Purpose: CHEK2*1100delC is a founder variant in European populations that confers a two- to threefold increased risk of breast cancer (BC). Epidemiologic and family studies have suggested that the risk associated with CHEK2*1100delC is modified by other genetic factors in a multiplicative fashion. We have investigated this empirically using data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Methods: Using genotype data from 39,139 (624 1100delC carriers) BC patients and 40,063 (224) healthy controls from 32 BCAC studies, we analyzed the combined risk effects of CHEK2*1100delC and 77 common variants in terms of a polygenic risk score (PRS) and pairwise interaction. Results: The PRS conferred odds ratios (OR) of 1.59 (95% CI: 1.21–2.09) per standard deviation for BC for CHEK2*1100delC carriers and 1.58 (1.55–1.62) for noncarriers. No evidence of deviation from the multiplicative model was found. The OR for the highest quintile of the PRS was 2.03 (0.86–4.78) for CHEK2*1100delC carriers, placing them in the high risk category according to UK NICE guidelines. The OR for the lowest quintile was 0.52 (0.16–1.74), indicating a lifetime risk close to the population average. Conclusion: Our results confirm the multiplicative nature of risk effects conferred by CHEK2*1100delC and the common susceptibility variants. Furthermore, the PRS could identify carriers at a high lifetime risk for clinical actions. Genet Med advance online publication 06 October 2016

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive form of breast cancer. It is often associated with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and is considered to be a non-obligate precursor of IDC. It is not clear to what extent these two forms of cancer share low-risk susceptibility loci, or whether there are differences in the strength of association for shared loci. To identify genetic polymorphisms that predispose to DCIS, we pooled data from 38 studies comprising 5,067 cases of DCIS, 24,584 cases of IDC and 37,467 controls, all genotyped using the iCOGS chip. Most (67 %) of the 76 known breast cancer predisposition loci showed an association with DCIS in the same direction as previously reported for invasive breast cancer. Case-only analysis showed no evidence for differences between associations for IDC and DCIS after considering multiple testing. Analysis by estrogen receptor (ER) status confirmed that loci associated with ER positive IDC were also associated with ER positive DCIS. Analysis of DCIS by grade suggested that two independent SNPs at 11q13.3 near CCND1 were specific to low/intermediate grade DCIS (rs75915166, rs554219). These associations with grade remained after adjusting for ER status and were also found in IDC. We found no novel DCIS-specific loci at a genome wide significance level of P < 5.0x10-8. In conclusion, this study provides the strongest evidence to date of a shared genetic susceptibility for IDC and DCIS. Studies with larger numbers of DCIS are needed to determine if IDC or DCIS specific loci exist.

Noninvasive detection of aberrant DNA methylation could provide invaluable biomarkers for earlier detection of triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) which could help clinicians with easier and more efficient treatment options. We evaluated genome‐wide DNA methylation data derived from TNBC and normal breast tissues, peripheral blood of TNBC cases and controls and reference samples of sorted blood and mammary cells. Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between TNBC and normal breast tissues were stringently selected, verified and externally validated. A machine‐learning algorithm was applied to select the top DMRs, which then were evaluated on plasma‐derived circulating cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) samples of TNBC patients and healthy controls. We identified 23 DMRs accounting for the methylation profile of blood cells and reference mammary cells and then selected six top DMRs for cfDNA analysis. We quantified un‐/methylated copies of these DMRs by droplet digital PCR analysis in a plasma test set from TNBC patients and healthy controls and confirmed our findings obtained on tissues. Differential cfDNA methylation was confirmed in an independent validation set of plasma samples. A methylation score combining signatures of the top three DMRs overlapping with the SPAG6, LINC10606 and TBCD/ZNF750 genes had the best capability to discriminate TNBC patients from controls (AUC = 0.78 in the test set and AUC = 0.74 in validation set). Our findings demonstrate the usefulness of cfDNA‐based methylation signatures as noninvasive liquid biopsy markers for the diagnosis of TNBC.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and the third most frequent cause of cancer deaths worldwide. The high death rate associated with GC, and lack of appropriate biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment emphasize the need for identification of novel molecules. Given the emerging roles for long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in cancer development, we studied novel lncRNA candidates involved in gastric carcinogenesis. LncRNA candidate discovery was performed using analyses of available datasets and literature. Validation was done using an internal sample set of GC/normal tissues, and external independent datasets. Network analysis and functional annotation of co-expressed protein coding genes were performed using the weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) and ingenuity pathway analysis. Two novel lncRNAs, PCAT18 and LINC01133, associated with GC development were identified by analysis of the discovery Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. The down-regulation of these genes in GC tissues was successfully validated internally and externally. The results showed a tissue-specific down-regulation of PCAT18 and LINC01133 in gastrointestinal tissues. WGCNA and ingenuity pathway analyses revealed that the genes co-expressed with the two lncRNAs were mostly involved in metabolic pathways and networks of gastrointestinal disease and function. Our findings of a tissue-specific down-regulation of PCAT18 and LINC01133 in gastric and other gastrointestinal cancers imply that these lncRNAs may have a tumor suppressive function in the development of these tumor entities. The two lncRNA biomarkers may contribute to a better understanding of the complex mechanisms of gastric carcinogenesis.