Background: Low serum magnesium (sMg) is associated with cardiovascular risk factors and atherosclerotic disease. Objective: To evaluate the association between sMg levels on admission and clinical outcomes in hospitalized non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to a single tertiary center with a primary diagnosis of NSTEMI. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease were excluded. Clinical data were collected and compared between lower sMg quartile patients (Q1; sMg < 1.9 mg/dL) and all other patients (Q2–Q4; sMg ≥ 1.9 mg/dL). Results: The study cohort included 4552 patients (70% male, median age 69 [IQR 59–79]) who were followed for a median of 4.4 (IQR 2.4–6.6) years. The median sMg level in the low sMg group was 1.7 (1.6–1.8) and 2.0 (2.0–2.2) mg/dL in the normal/high sMg group. The low sMg group was older (mean of 72 vs. 67 years), less likely to be male (64% vs. 72%), and had higher rates of comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation (59% vs. 29%, 92% vs. 85%, and 6% vs. 5%; p < 0.05 for all). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher cumulative death probability at 4 years in the low sMg group (34% vs. 22%; p log rank <0.001). In a multivariable analysis model adjusted for sex, significant comorbidities, coronary interventions during the hospitalization, and renal function, the low sMg group exhibited an independent 24% increased risk of death during follow up (95% CI 1.11–1.39; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Low sMg is independently associated with higher risk of long-term mortality among patients recovering from an NSTEMI event.
Background/Objectives: The optimal method to facilitate femoral access in patients with aortic stenosis and severe peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. This study compared the safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) versus Shockwave® intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in patients with severe PAD undergoing TAVI via the trans-femoral route enrolled in the Hostile TAVI registry trial. Methods: Patients with severe PAD from 28 international centers were enrolled in the registry. This sub-study analyzed patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI facilitated by PTA (n = 352) or IVL (n = 166). Primary endpoints included rates of survival, major vascular complications, and major bleeding. Outcomes were also stratified according to the severity of PAD using the novel Hostile risk score. Results: Patients in the PTA group were older and had lower rates of prior stroke/TIA. All-cause mortality at 3 years was similar between PTA and IVL groups (34.9% vs. 38.6%; p = 0.27, respectively). However, IVL was associated with fewer major vascular complications (21.7% vs. 13.3%; p = 0.033, respectively), less major bleeding (14.0% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.024, respectively), and shorter hospital stays (7.06 ± 6.69 vs. 4.29 ± 4.78 days; p < 0.001; 95% CI: 1.63–3.91, respectively). Cox regression analysis showed that at low (≤8.5) Hostile Scores, PTA was associated with higher rates of major vascular complications and major bleeding than IVL. Conclusions: In patients with aortic stenosis and severe PAD undergoing TAVI via the transfemoral route, IVL is safer than PTA, with fewer vascular and bleeding complications but similar intermediate-term survival.