One of the greatest challenges in modern gynecological oncology is ovarian cancer. Despite the numerous studies currently being conducted, it is still sometimes detected at late clinical stages, where the prognosis is unfavorable. One significant contributing factor is the absence of sensitive and specific parameters that could aid in early diagnosis. An ideal screening test, in view of the low incidence of ovarian cancer, should have a sensitivity of greater than 75% and a specificity of at least 99.6%. To enhance sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic panels are being created by combining individual markers. The drive to develop better screening tests for ovarian cancer focuses on modern diagnostic methods based on molecular testing, which in turn aims to find increasingly effective biomarkers. Currently, researchers’ efforts are focused on the search for a complementary parameter to those most commonly used that would satisfactorily enhance the sensitivity and specificity of assays. Several biomarkers, including microRNA molecules, autoantibodies, cDNA, adipocytokines, and galectins, are currently being investigated by researchers. This article reviews recent studies comparing the sensitivity and specificity of selected parameters used alone and in combination to increase detection of ovarian cancer at an early stage.

Gynaecological cancers, including endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancers as well as breast cancer, despite numerous studies, still constitute a challenge for modern oncology. For this reason, research aimed at the application of modern diagnostic methods that are useful in early detection, prognosis, and treatment monitoring deserves special attention, Great hopes are currently being placed on the use of liquid biopsy (LB), which examines various tumour components, including cell-free RNA (cfRNA), circulating tumour cells (CTCs), circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), exosomes, and tumour-educated platelets (TEPs). LB has shown promise as a minimally invasive means of early diagnosis of cancers, detection of recurrence, prediction of therapy response, treatment monitoring, and drug selection. The integration of this test into clinical practice in modern oncology is challenging, but offers many benefits, including reducing the risks associated with invasive procedures, improving diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy, and improving the quality of life of oncology patients. The aim of this review is to present recent reports on the use of ctDNA in diagnosing, predicting the outcome of, and monitoring the treatment of gynaecological and breast cancers.