Susanne Linn Skjærvø

Susanne Linn Skjærvø

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 December 2019 in Chemistry of Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GOGary K. Ong
Gary K. Ong
CCCamila A. Saez Cabezas
Camila A. Saez Cabezas
MDManuel N. Dominguez
Manuel N. Dominguez
SSSusanne Linn Skjærvø
Susanne Linn Skjærvø
SHSungyeon Heo
Sungyeon Heo
DMDelia J. Milliron
Delia J. Milliron

12 May 2017 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ADAntoine R. M. Dalod
Antoine R. M. Dalod
OGOla G. Grendal
Ola G. Grendal
SSSusanne Linn Skjærvø
Susanne Linn Skjærvø
KIKatherine Inzani
Katherine Inzani
SSSverre M. Selbach
Sverre M. Selbach
MEMari-Ann Einarsrud
Mari-Ann Einarsrud

20 June 2018 in Royal Society Open Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSusanne Linn Skjærvø
Susanne Linn Skjærvø
KHK. Høydalsvik
K. Høydalsvik
ABA. B. Blichfeld
A. B. Blichfeld
MEM.-A. Einarsrud
M.-A. Einarsrud
TTTor Tor
Tor Tor
The thermal evolution of the crystal structure and phase transitions of KNbO 3 were investigated by high-temperature powder X-ray diffraction and Rietveld refinement of the diffraction data. Two phase transitions from orthorhombic ( Amm 2) to tetragonal ( P 4 mm ) and from tetragonal to cubic ( P m 3 ¯ m ) were confirmed, both on heating and cooling. Both phase transitions are first order based on the observed hysteresis. The mixed displacive and order–disorder nature of the tetragonal to cubic transition is argued based on symmetry and apparent divergence of the atomic positions from pseudo-cubic values. The transition between the orthorhombic and tetragonal phase shows no temperature-dependence for atomic positions and only thermal expansion of the unit cell parameters and is thus discussed in relation to a lattice dynamical instability.

18 April 2017 in Journal of the American Ceramic Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSusanne Linn Skjærvø
Susanne Linn Skjærvø
SSSanna Sommer
Sanna Sommer
PNPeter Nørby
Peter Nørby
EBEspen Drath Bøjesen
Espen Drath Bøjesen
TTTor Tor
Tor Tor
MEMari-Ann Einarsrud
Mari-Ann Einarsrud

29 January 2018 in Crystal Growth & Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSusanne Linn Skjærvø
Susanne Linn Skjærvø
KWKristin Høydalsvik Wells
Kristin Høydalsvik Wells
SSSanna Sommer
Sanna Sommer
TVTuong-Dan Vu
Tuong-Dan Vu
JTJulian R. Tolchard
Julian R. Tolchard
MEMari-Ann Einarsrud
Mari-Ann Einarsrud

23 March 2021 in Inorganic Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSusanne Linn Skjærvø
Susanne Linn Skjærvø
GOGary K. Ong
Gary K. Ong
OGOla Gjønnes Grendal
Ola Gjønnes Grendal
KWKristin Høydalsvik Wells
Kristin Høydalsvik Wells
WBWouter van Beek
Wouter van Beek
MEMari-Ann Einarsrud
Mari-Ann Einarsrud
Sodium niobate (NaNbO3) attracts attention for its great potential in a variety of applications, for instance, due to its unique optical properties. Still, optimization of its synthetic procedures is hard due to the lack of understanding of the formation mechanism under hydrothermal conditions. Through in situ X-ray diffraction, hydrothermal synthesis of NaNbO3 was observed in real time, enabling the investigation of the reaction kinetics and mechanisms with respect to temperature and NaOH concentration and the resulting effect on the product crystallite size and structure. Several intermediate phases were observed, and the relationship between them, depending on temperature, time, and NaOH concentration, was established. The reaction mechanism involved a gradual change of the local structure of the solid Nb2O5 precursor upon suspending it in NaOH solutions. Heating gave a full transformation of the precursor to HNa7Nb6O19·15H2O, which destabilized before new polyoxoniobates appeared, whose structure depended on the NaOH concentration. Following these polyoxoniobates, Na2Nb2O6·H2O formed, which dehydrated at temperatures ≥285 °C, before converting to the final phase, NaNbO3. The total reaction rate increased with decreasing NaOH concentration and increasing temperature. Two distinctly different growth regimes for NaNbO3 were observed, depending on the observed phase evolution, for temperatures below and above ≈285 °C. Below this temperature, the growth of NaNbO3 was independent of the reaction temperature and the NaOH concentration, while for temperatures ≥285 °C, the temperature-dependent crystallite size showed the characteristics of a typical dissolution–precipitation mechanism.