The present study was designed to compare the stress distributions in two restoration types of implants and the surrounding bone. The first restoration type was a conventional cement-retained zirconia crown, and the second was a novel cementless screw-retained zirconia crown with a base abutment. A three-dimensional finite element method was used to model the implants, restorations, and supporting bone. A comparative study of the two implants was performed under two masticatory loads: a vertical load of 100 N and a 30-degree oblique load of 100 N. Under both loading conditions, the maximum von Mises stress and strain values in the implant and supporting bone were higher in the conventional cement-retained restoration model than in the cementless screw-retained model. In terms of stress distribution, the cementless screw-retained zirconia crown with base abutment may be considered a superior restoration option compared to the conventional cement-retained zirconia crown.

Inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is the most frequently used treatment for mandibular molars. Successful IANB requires insertion of the dental needle near the mandibular foramen. In this study, we aimed to analyze the anatomic location of the mandibular lingula and evaluate the effects of internal oblique ridge (IOR)-guided IANB. The location of the mandibular lingula was measured using cone-beam computed tomography images of the mandibles obtained from 125 patients. We measured the distances from the occlusal plane to the lingula and from the IOR to the lingula in 250 mandibular rami. Based on the mean of these distances, alternative anesthesia was carried out on 300 patients, and the success rate of the technique was evaluated. The mean vertical distance was 8.85±2.59 mm, and the mean horizontal distance was 14.68±1.44 mm. The vertical (P<0.001) and the horizontal (P<0.05) distances showed significant differences between the sex groups. The success rate of the IOR-guided technique was 97.3%. IANB-based location of mandibular lingula showed a high success rate. From this study, we concluded that analysis of the anatomic locations for mandibular lingula and IOR-guided IANB are useful for restorative and surgical dental procedures of the mandibular molars.

Hongkyung Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Jinho Lee, M.D., Mi Ri Park, B.S., Zisun Choi, M.S., Seung Jung Han, Ph.D., Dongha Kim, M.S., Saeam Shin, M.D., Ph.D., Seung-Tae Lee, M.D., Ph.D., Jong Rak Choi, M.D., Ph.D., and Seung Woo Park, M.D., Ph.D.. Ann Lab Med 2025;45:199-208. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0345

Background/Objectives: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker for non-invasive tumor monitoring in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Methods: In this study, 52 patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage DLBCL treated with R-CHOP underwent serial ctDNA analysis at baseline, interim (after three cycles), and end of treatment. The prognostic significance of ctDNA dynamics was evaluated, and its predictive value was compared with the PET/CT response. Results: Targeted next-generation sequencing revealed baseline ctDNA in 98.1% of patients, with 74.7% concordance to tumor tissue genotyping. Higher baseline ctDNA levels correlated with elevated LDH, older age, and high IPI scores. A ≥2-log reduction in ctDNA at interim was significantly associated with improved overall survival (p = 0.004), though not with progression-free survival. Notably, combining interim ctDNA dynamics with PET/CT results enhanced the predictive accuracy for treatment outcomes, particularly among patients with partial metabolic responses. Conclusions: These findings support the clinical utility of ctDNA for dynamic risk assessment in DLBCL, and suggest that integrating ctDNA with imaging biomarkers may guide more personalized therapeutic strategies. Further validation using highly sensitive ctDNA assays is warranted to optimize its role in routine clinical practice.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of a pan-cancer circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel for predicting treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and Methods: A total of 41 patients with advanced solid tumors, including gastric cancer (n=13), non-small cell lung cancer (n=10), head and neck cancer (n=9), esophageal cancer (n=7), breast cancer (n=1), and colon cancer (n=1), were prospectively enrolled and included in the analysis. ctDNA was analyzed at three time points: pretreatment (41 patients), post-treatment evaluation (37 patients), and follow-up (18 patients). Results: Among 41 patients analyzed at pretreatment, 35 (85.4%) exhibited tier 1 or 2 somatic variants in ctDNA, with TP53 being the most frequently mutated gene. At the post-treatment evaluation, ctDNA was assessed in 37 patients (3 with rapid deterioration and 1 lost to follow-up were not evaluable). Newly emerging variants after treatment were strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes. Consistent with the Kaplan–Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression confirmed that post-treatment ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with inferior PFS (HR 10.5, 95% CI 1.4– 80.0, P=0.024). At follow-up, 18 patients were evaluable, while the others were not due to follow-up loss, rapid deterioration, or study termination. ctDNA positivity at post-treatment evaluation was significantly associated with shorter PFS (median PFS, 5.0 months [95% CI: 2.0– 12.0] vs not reached; HR, 4.87; 95% CI: 1.69– 14.09; P = 0.0035). Conclusion: Longitudinal monitoring of ctDNA using a pan-cancer NGS panel provides meaningful prognostic information in patients with advanced cancers. Post-treatment ctDNA dynamics may better reflect disease progression than baseline ctDNA status alone, highlighting the need for further validation in larger cohorts, particularly in gastric, lung, head and neck, and esophageal cancers. Plain Language Summary: Cancer cells can release small fragments of their DNA into the bloodstream, known as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). These fragments can be detected through a blood test, often called a “liquid biopsy.” By monitoring changes in ctDNA over time, doctors can better understand how a patient’s cancer is responding to treatment. In this study, we analyzed blood samples from 41 patients with advanced cancers, including stomach, lung, and esophageal cancers. Using a genetic test called next-generation sequencing (NGS), we examined cancer-related DNA changes at three time points: before treatment, after the first round of treatment, and during follow-up care. We then assessed how these changes related to the time patients lived without their cancer worsening, a measure known as progression-free survival (PFS). We found that over 85% of patients had significant cancer-related DNA changes before starting treatment. After treatment, many patients developed new mutations, which were associated with shorter PFS. In contrast, patients without new ctDNA changes after treatment generally had better outcomes. These results suggest that ctDNA monitoring after treatment may provide better information about a patient’s status than testing before treatment alone. Ongoing blood-based monitoring could help guide future treatment decisions. However, larger studies are needed to validate these findings.