The etiology of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) has been linked to various factors, including functional and psychological factors, which makes it difficult to identify associations between a single etiological factor and the signs and symptoms of TMDs. Objectives: This study aimed to describe the presence of TMD symptoms and their relationship with sleep disturbances and emotional disorders in children and adolescents. Methods: This observational study included Spanish children aged between 8 and 13 years. The measurement instruments consisted of the BRUNI survey for sleep disorders and the Educational-Clinical Questionnaire: Anxiety and Depression (CECAD) survey. A clinical examination was subsequently performed following the DC/TMD guidelines for diagnosing TMDs. Frequencies, means, and standard deviations were applied, along with the prevalence ratio as a measure of association and the chi-square test. The significance level was set at 5%. Results: A total of 128 participants participated in the study with a mean age of 10.89 (±2.15) years. The prevalence of TMDs was 54%, while the most common symptoms were muscle pain at 26%, joint pain at 14%, and a combination of both at 14%. Children who presented muscle pain had a mean anxiety score of 44.87 (±11.85), whereas those without symptoms had a mean score of 36 (±10.78, and 0.03 p-value). The BRUNI index revealed that 78.13% of patients with TMDs had difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep, with a prevalence ratio (PR) of 3.57 (p-value 0.041). Conclusions: The present study reveals that temporomandibular disorders are common in children and adolescents, with 54% presenting at least one clinical sign or symptom. Emotional disturbances and sleep problems were also prevalent, affecting 41% and 56% of participants, respectively. Early interdisciplinary screening is essential to manage the co-occurrence of TMDs, emotional distress, and sleep problems in children.

Background: Dental caries is currently the most common chronic disease affecting the Spanish pediatric population. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to assess Caries Management by Risk Assessment (CAMBRA) in children attending a university dental clinic between the ages of 6 and 12 and establish the DMFT (decayed, missing, and filled teeth index for permanent teeth) of the sample. In addition, the study calculated the plaque index, salivary pH level, buffering capacity, and the quantity and quality of saliva in the sample and determined if there were statistical differences between sexes and between subgroups with DMFT = 0 (control) and DMFT > 0 (cases). Methods: A case–control study was conducted with 89 patients aged 6 to 12 years. Clinical and salivary indicators were measured. Caries risk was also assessed using the CAMBRA protocol, and the sample was also divided into control and case groups for further analysis. Results: The CAMBRA questionnaire showed that 65.2% of participants presented a high risk of caries. The sample showed an average DMFT of 0.65 with a plaque index of 57.2%. The mean salivary pH was 7.35 (±0.30). The average volume of stimulated saliva was 6.83 mL (±3.68), and the buffering capacity was classified as normal in 57% of cases. No statistically significant differences were found between sexes or in the evaluated risk factors. In the control group, the mean salivary pH value was 7.35, and the amount of stimulated saliva was 6.5 mL. The buffering capacity was classified as normal in 67% of cases. In contrast, the case group presented a mean pH value of 7.15 and a salivary volume of 5 mL, with a normal buffer capacity in 50% of cases. Conclusions: The CAMBRA protocol indicated that more than half of the participants presented a high risk of caries, indicating the need to customize treatment plans for each patient. The salivary pH showed statistic differences between the control and case groups, indicating the importance of incorporating salivary biomarkers into routine clinical practice.