Silke Oellerich

Dr. Silke Oellerich

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2002 in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SOSilke Oellerich
Silke Oellerich
Hainer WackerbarthHainer Wackerbarth
Hainer Wackerbarth
PHPeter Hildebrandt
Peter Hildebrandt

1 March 2015 in Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMarina Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora
Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora
RQRuth Quilendrino
Ruth Quilendrino
LHLisanne Ham
Lisanne Ham
VLVasilios S. Liarakos
Vasilios S. Liarakos
KDKorine van Dijk
Korine van Dijk
GMGerrit R.J. Melles
Gerrit R.J. Melles

1 November 2011 in Archives of Ophthalmology (1950)
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMartin Dirisamer
Martin Dirisamer
LHLisanne Ham
Lisanne Ham
IDIsabel Dapena
Isabel Dapena
KMKyros Moutsouris
Kyros Moutsouris
KDKonstantinos Droutsas
Konstantinos Droutsas
GMGerrit R. J. Melles
Gerrit R. J. Melles
Since 1998, we have introduced various techniques for treatment of corneal endothelial disorders, popularized as deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK).1-5 Recently, we described a technique for selective transplant of the Descemet membrane (DM), referred to as Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).1,2

1 November 2015 in JAMA Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LBLamis Baydoun
Lamis Baydoun
LHLisanne Ham
Lisanne Ham
VBVincent Borderie
Vincent Borderie
IDIsabel Dapena
Isabel Dapena
JHJingzhen Hou
Jingzhen Hou
GMGerrit R. J. Melles
Gerrit R. J. Melles
Since its introduction in 1998, endothelial keratoplasty has become increasingly popular and evolved from deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty to Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and most recently to Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).1

1 September 2020 in American Journal of Ophthalmology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
IVIndrė Vasiliauskaitė
Indrė Vasiliauskaitė
SOSilke Oellerich
Silke Oellerich
LHLisanne Ham
Lisanne Ham
IDIsabel Dapena
Isabel Dapena
LBLamis Baydoun
Lamis Baydoun
GMGerrit R.J. Melles
Gerrit R.J. Melles

12 April 2017 in Cornea
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JPJorge Peraza-Nieves
Jorge Peraza-Nieves
LBLamis Baydoun
Lamis Baydoun
IDIsabel Dapena
Isabel Dapena
AIAbbas Ilyas
Abbas Ilyas
LFLaurence E. Frank
Laurence E. Frank
GMGerrit R. J. Melles
Gerrit R. J. Melles
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases up to 2 years after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and to assess which parameters may have influenced the clinical outcome.Methods: From a group of 500 eyes (393 patients), which underwent DMEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), bullous keratopathy, failed corneal transplants and other indications, clinical outcomes [best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central endothelial cell density (ECD), and central corneal thickness] were evaluated before, and at 6, 12, and 24 months after DMEK and postoperative complications were documented.Results: At 12 months postoperatively, 81% of eyes reached a BCVA of ≥20/25 (≥0.8), 49% ≥20/20 (≥1.0), and 15% ≥20/18 (≥1.2) (n = 396) and remained stable up to 24 months (P= 0.828). Compared with preoperative ECD, mean postoperative ECD decreased by 37 (±18)%, 40 (±18)%, and 45 (±18)% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively (P< 0.05 for all time points). Surgery indication and graft attachment status were related to postoperative BCVA and ECD results. Eyes with FECD and attached grafts showed better BCVA outcomes and higher ECD (P< 0.05). Central corneal thickness decreased by 20 (±11)% to 525 (±46) μm from preoperative to 6 months postoperatively and remained stable thereafter (P> 0.05). Within the study period, retransplantation was required in 32 eyes (6.4%). Principal longer-term complications were secondary graft failure (1.4%) and allograft rejection (1.4%).Conclusions: Clinical outcomes remain excellent up to 2 years after DMEK, in particular for eyes operated on for FECD and with completely attached grafts.