The introduction of the so-called immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) substantially changed the history of cancer therapy. On the other hand, they can induce the development of rheumatic immune-related adverse events (Rh-irAEs). In the scenario of a joint oncology/rheumatology outpatient clinic, we conducted a single-centre descriptive study to define from a laboratory, clinical and therapeutic point of view, rheumatic conditions developed during anti-PD1 treatment. The study included 32 patients (M/F 16/16, median age 69, IQR 16.5). According to the international classification criteria, eight patients could be classified as affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis, one by Psoriatic Arthritis, six by Polymyalgia Rheumatica, five by systemic connective tissue diseases (two systemic lupus erythematosus, two Sjögren’s syndrome, one undifferentiated connective tissue disease). The remaining patients were diagnosed as having undifferentiated arthritis or inflammatory arthralgia. The median interval between ICIs starting and the onset of symptoms was 14 weeks (IQR 19.75). Moving to treatment, the longitudinal observation revealed that all RA, PsA and CTD patients required the introduction of treatment with DMARDs. In conclusion, the growing use of ICIs in a real-life setting confirmed the possible development of different rheumatological conditions, further emphasising the need for shared oncology/rheumatology management.

Background: The outcomes of patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer (GCPMs) remain dismal, with an overall survival (OS) of less than 1 year. Approaches reported from East Asia include normothermic intraperitoneal systemic chemotherapy, aimed at downstaging the disease, allowing an R0 resection. This is the first Western study evaluating a bidirectional regimen in a neoadjuvant setting of GCPMs. This phase II study evaluates the tolerability, efficacy and conversion surgery rate. Methods: Patients with PCI < 13 without ascites or HER2 overexpression and no extraperitoneal spread were enrolled starting in January 2018. After staging laparoscopy combined with PIPAC (cisplatin + doxorubicin), NIPS began following Yonemura’s schedule: cisplatin (30 mg/m²) + docetaxel (30 mg/m²), intraperitoneally (day 1); capecitabine 1000 mg/m², orally (days 2–15); and cisplatin (30 mg/m²) + docetaxel (30 mg/m²), intravenous (day 8). After three cycles, patients with no progressive disease and negative peritoneal cytology underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Three additional NIPS cycles were reserved for patients who underwent surgery. Results: Among the 25 treated patients with 17.3-month (95%CI: 10.4; NA) OS, no adverse events (CTCAE) ≥ G3 arose. With a 52% conversion surgery rate, 13 patients underwent CRS combined with HIPEC (cisplatin 100 mg/m²), 10 with CC0 status 3 with CC experienced no operative mortality, and major complications rated Clavien–Dindo IIIB occurred in 2 patients (15.4%). The median OS for patients undergoing surgery was 26 (95%CI: 23.1; NA) months, with progression-free survival of 20 (95%CI: 16.7–NA) months. Conclusions: NIPS is safe and effective. The conversion rate in our Western patients is comparable to that reported in Eastern Asian countries.