Ivelina Popova

Dr. Ivelina Popova

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

3Years (2024-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
12 April 2024 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Kostadin Rangelov KostadinovKostadin Rangelov Kostadinov
Kostadin Rangelov Kostadinov
IPIvelina Popova
Ivelina Popova
YMYuliyana Marinova
Yuliyana Marinova
NMNina Musurlieva
Nina Musurlieva
GIGeorgi Iskrov
Georgi Iskrov
RSRumen Stefanov
Rumen Stefanov
Rare cancers are defined by an annual incidence of fewer than 6 per 100,000. Bearing similarities to rare diseases, they are associated with substantial health inequalities due to diagnostic complexity and delayed access to innovative therapies. This situation is further aggravated in Southeastern European countries like Bulgaria, where limited public resources and expertise underscore the need for additional policy and translational research on rare cancers. This study aimed to explore the availability and access to orphan drugs for rare cancers in Bulgaria for the period of 2020–2023. We cross-compared data from both the European Union and national public sources to evaluate the number of available and accessible orphan drugs for rare cancers, the delay from market authorization to reimbursement, the dynamics of public expenditures, and regional disparities in access across the country. We juxtaposed the main characteristics of oncological and non-oncological orphan drugs as well. Only 15 out of 50 oncological orphan drugs that were authorized by the European Medicine Agency were accessible for rare cancer patients in Bulgaria. The median delay between market authorization and inclusion in the Bulgarian Positive Drug List was 760 days. The total expenditures for all orphan drugs for rare cancers amounted to EUR 74,353,493 from 2020 to 2023. The budgetary impact of this group rose from 0.24% to 3.77% of total public medicinal product expenditures for the study period. Rare cancer patients represent a vulnerable population that often faces limited to no access to treatment. We call for targeted European and national policies to address this major inequality.

30 June 2025 in Dentistry Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NPNiкolai Pavlov
Niкolai Pavlov
IPIvelina Popova
Ivelina Popova
NMNina Musurlieva
Nina Musurlieva
Ralitsa RaychevaRalitsa Raycheva
Ralitsa Raycheva
KTKonstantin Trifonov
Konstantin Trifonov
RCRadka Cholakova
Radka Cholakova
Background: Secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) plays a key role in oral and mucosal immunity, serving as a first-line defense against pathogens. Smoking is known to negatively affect immune function, but data on the impact of heated tobacco products such as IQOS® on sIgA levels are limited. Objective: To assess and compare the effects of conventional cigarette smoking and IQOS® use on the concentration of salivary sIgA in healthy individuals. Methods: A total of 200 participants were enrolled and divided into three groups: 60 non-smokers, 70 conventional cigarette smokers, and 70 IQOS® users. Unstimulated whole saliva samples were collected and analyzed for sIgA concentration using ELISA method. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 25. Results: Mean salivary sIgA levels were significantly lower in both cigarette smokers (246.03 μg/mL) and IQOS® users (243.54 μg/mL) compared to non-smokers (380.74 μg/mL, p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between cigarette smokers and IQOS® users. A pronounced reduction in sIgA was seen in female users of both tobacco products, whereas male users did not show a statistically significant decline. Conclusions: Both cigarette smoking and IQOS® use are associated with a significant decrease in salivary sIgA levels, particularly in females. The findings suggest that IQOS® does not offer an immunological advantage over conventional smoking in terms of preserving mucosal immunity. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore underlying mechanisms.

25 November 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ralitsa RaychevaRalitsa Raycheva
Ralitsa Raycheva
IPIvelina Popova
Ivelina Popova
NMNina Musurlieva
Nina Musurlieva
Background/Objectives: Oral health is a critical component of public health, yet disparities in access and financing remain significant. In Bulgaria, dental services are financed through the National Health Insurance Fund and patient co-payments, with coverage differing between children and adults. The aim of this study was to analyze the dynamics of health insurance payments and expenditures for dental care in Bulgaria over the period 2019–2025, with a focus on differences between age groups and the balance between public funding and patient contributions. Methods: A retrospective descriptive–analytical study was conducted using aggregated data from NHIF annual reports, national legislation, and secondary literature. Absolute expenditures (BGN) and relative shares (%) of dental services within total health insurance payments were examined for the period 2019–2025 (actual data). Key dental procedures analyzed included examinations, restorations, extractions, and treatment of pulpitis/periodontitis in children, as well as prosthetic rehabilitation in older adults. Descriptive statistics, trend analysis, and simple linear regression were applied to assess expenditure growth and predictability. Results: Total health insurance payments in Bulgaria nearly doubled between 2019 and 2025, increasing from 4.12 to 8.87 million BGN. Dental expenditures rose from 167,000 to 416,000 BGN, with the share of dental care rising modestly from 4.05% to 4.69%. For children, NHIF covered nearly all costs, with minimal or absent co-payments. Among adults, a co-financing model prevailed, with fixed patient contributions for basic services but full NHIF coverage for prosthetic rehabilitation in edentulous patients aged 65–69 years. Conclusions: Bulgaria’s dental care financing reflects a socially oriented model, with full coverage for children and mixed financing for adults. Strategic policy adjustments are needed to ensure sustainability, equity, and alignment with universal health coverage goals.