Serious games that integrate educational content with engaging gameplay mechanics hold promise for reducing cognitive load and increasing student motivation in STEM and health science education. This preliminary study presents the development and evaluation of the Medimon NASA Demo, a game-based learning prototype designed to teach undergraduate students about the musculoskeletal and visual systems—two critical domains in space medicine. Participants (n = 23) engaged with the game over a two-week self-regulated learning period. The game employed mnemonic-based characters, visual storytelling, and turn-based battle mechanics to reinforce medical concepts. Quantitative results demonstrated significant learning gains, with posttest scores increasing by an average of 23% and a normalized change of c = 0.4. Engagement levels were high across multiple dimensions of situational interest, and 74% of participants preferred the game over traditional formats. Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses revealed themes related to intrinsic appeal, perceived learning efficacy, interaction design, and cognitive resource management. While the game had minimal impact on short-term STEM career interest, its educational potential was clearly supported. These findings suggest that mnemonic-driven serious games like Medimon can effectively enhance engagement and learning in health science education, especially when aligned with real-world contexts such as space medicine.

Serious games that integrate educational content with engaging gameplay mechanics hold promise for reducing cognitive load and increasing student motivation in STEM and health science education. This study presents the development and evaluation of the Medimon NASA Demo, a game-based learning prototype designed to teach undergraduate students about the musculoskeletal and visual systems—two critical domains in space medicine. Participants (n = 23) engaged with the game over a two-week self-regulated learning period. The game employed mnemonic-based characters, visual storytelling, and turn-based battle mechanics to reinforce medical concepts. Quantitative results demonstrated significant learning gains, with posttest scores increasing by an average of 23% and a normalized change of c = 0.4. Engagement levels were high across multiple dimensions of situational interest, and 74% of participants preferred the game over traditional formats. Qualitative analysis of open-ended responses revealed themes related to intrinsic appeal, perceived learning efficacy, interaction design, and cognitive resource management. While the game had minimal impact on short-term STEM career interest, its educational potential was clearly supported. These findings suggest that mnemonic-driven serious games like Medimon can effectively enhance engagement and learning in health science education, especially when aligned with real-world contexts such as space medicine.

Medimon is an educational role-playing game that integrates visual mnemonics, collectible creatures, disease states, treatment items, and artificial intelligence-powered non-player characters (AI-NPCs) to teach biomedical concepts. This single-arm mixed-methods feasibility pilot examined recruitment, gameplay uptake and progression, player experience, descriptive knowledge outcomes, and AI-NPC interactions during the Medimon endocrine level among high school students. Thirty students consented; 10 generated gameplay data, six completed paired 12-item pretests and posttests, and eight completed a PXI-style survey. Students played independently using a Steam-based build and encountered thyroid, pancreas, and adrenal educational content through exploration, quests, battles, and Medimon collection. Mean paired knowledge scores increased from 19.4% at pretest to 44.4% at posttest, although the change was not statistically significant in this small exploratory sample (p = 0.156). Audiovisual appeal, curiosity, and enjoyment were rated favorably, whereas Progress Feedback was the lowest-rated player-experience domain. Students who completed the posttest demonstrated greater gameplay duration, exploration, quest completion, and Medimon exposure than non-completers. Thematic analysis identified a mismatch between player expectations and AI-NPC scope, including fabricated quests, spatial directions, and game mechanics that introduced unreliable guidance into the educational environment. The study identified barriers related to gameplay uptake, progression feedback, posttest completion, and AI-NPC reliability that should be addressed before the educational efficacy of Medimon is evaluated in a larger controlled study.