Bram Spruyt

Prof. Bram Spruyt

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 March 2016 in Political Research Quarterly
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BSBram Spruyt
Bram Spruyt
GKGil Keppens
Gil Keppens
FDFilip Van Droogenbroeck
Filip Van Droogenbroeck
In this paper, we engage with the emerging literature that studies the support for populism by means of attitudes among the public at large. More specifically, our paper has two objectives. First, we extend recent research by Akkerman et al. by showing that their measure performs rather well in a context that differs from the one it was originally formulated in. Data from Flanders (the Dutch speaking part of Belgium, N = 1,577) also demonstrate that the support for populism can be empirically distinguished from feelings of lack of external political efficacy. Second, this is one of the first studies that assess who supports populism and why they do so. We show that populism is embedded in deep feelings of discontent, not only with politics but also with societal life in general. Moreover, we demonstrate that populism is strongest supported by stigmatized groups who face difficulties in finding a positive social identity. In the conclusion, we discuss the implications of our findings.

10 January 2018 in BMC Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FDFilip Van Droogenbroeck
Filip Van Droogenbroeck
BSBram Spruyt
Bram Spruyt
GKGil Keppens
Gil Keppens
To investigate how social support relates to mental health problems for Belgian late adolescents and young adults 15–25 years of age. Additionally, we examine changes in mental health problems between 2008 and 2013 and investigate gender differences. Multivariate analysis of variance was used to investigate (1) psychological distress, (2) anxiety and (3) depression among 713 boys and 720 girls taken from two successive waves (2008 and 2013) of a representative sample of the Belgian population (Belgian Health Interview survey). Psychological distress was measured by the General Health Questionnaire, anxiety and depression by the Symptom Check-List-90-Revised. Gender differences were found for psychological distress, anxiety and depression with girls reporting significantly higher scores than boys. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) revealed that adolescents who are dissatisfied with their social contacts and experience poor social support reported more psychological distress, anxiety and depression. In addition, young adult boys (20–25 years of age) were more likely to experience psychological distress when compared to late adolescent boys (15–19 years of age). Finally, the prevalence of anxiety and depression increased substantially between 2008 and 2013 for girls and to a lesser extent for boys. Especially girls and young people with poor social support experience mental health problems more frequently than boys and those with strong social support. Improving social support among young people may serve as a protective buffer to mental health problems.

30 September 2014 in Government and Opposition
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MEMark Elchardus
Mark Elchardus
BSBram Spruyt
Bram Spruyt
Populism is usually studied by looking at the electoral and rhetorical strategies of parties considered to be populist. In contrast, this article attempts to measure the support for the core propositions of populism among voters and explain the social differences in that support. On the basis of a survey of the Dutch-speaking population of Belgium (N: 2,330) we find that this support for populism turns out not to be directly influenced by a weak or uncertain economic position, by dissatisfaction with personal life or feelings of anomie. Support for populism appears foremost as a consequence of a very negative view of the evolution of society – declinism – and of the feeling of belonging to a group of people that is unfairly treated by society.

1 October 2014 in Teaching and Teacher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FDFilip Van Droogenbroeck
Filip Van Droogenbroeck
BSBram Spruyt
Bram Spruyt
CVChristophe Vanroelen
Christophe Vanroelen

20 October 2017 in Swiss Political Science Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AAAgnes Akkerman
Agnes Akkerman
AZAndrej Zaslove
Andrej Zaslove
BSBram Spruyt
Bram Spruyt
Research on thesupply side of politicsdemonstrates that populism acts as a common denominator even though populist parties possess very different ideological positions. However, it is uncertain whether this translates to the demand side: Do voters support left and right‐wing populist parties for similar reasons? Using the Netherlands as our case study, we investigate the commondemand sidecharacteristics of supporters of populist radical right and populist radical left parties. The paper concludes that populist attitudes (i.e. a people‐centered notion of political representation) unify supporters of both populist radical left and populist radical right parties. Supporters of both parties also demonstrate lower levels of political trust (than voters for other parties): this is particularly the case forPVVsupporters. Beyond these similarities we find that thePVVand theSPattract very different supporters.PVVsupporters demonstrate low immigrant tolerance, whileSPvoters support more income equality.

1 May 2018 in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKToon Kuppens
Toon Kuppens
RSRussell Spears
Russell Spears
AMAntony S.R. Manstead
Antony S.R. Manstead
BSBram Spruyt
Bram Spruyt
MEMatthew Easterbrook
Matthew Easterbrook