The aims of the ‘Mobile-based lifestyle intervention in women with glucose intolerance after gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)’ study (MELINDA) are: (1) to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of glucose intolerance after a recent history of GDM; and (2) to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a telephone- and mobile-based lifestyle intervention in women with glucose intolerance after GDM. This is a Belgian multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) in seven hospitals with the aim of recruiting 236 women. Women in the intervention group will receive a blended program, based on one face-to-face education session and further follow-up through a mobile application and monthly telephone advice. Women in the control group will receive follow-up as in normal routine with referral to primary care. Participants will receive an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) one year after baseline. Primary endpoint is the frequency of weight goal achievement (≥5% weight loss if pre-pregnancy BMI ≥ 25 Kg/m² or return to pre-gravid weight if BMI < 25 Kg/m²). At each visit blood samples are collected, anthropometric measurements are obtained, and self-administered questionnaires are completed. Recruitment began in May 2019.

Background/Objectives: To evaluate diabetes risk perception in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and prediabetes in early postpartum. Methods: Secondary analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of a mobile-based postpartum lifestyle intervention in women with prediabetes after GDM. Data were collected from the Risk Perception Survey for Developing Diabetes at baseline (6–16 weeks postpartum) and one year post-randomization. Logistic regression was used to analyze the difference between the intervention and control groups on diabetes risk estimation. Results: Among 165 women with prediabetes in early postpartum (mean age: 32.1 years, mean BMI: 27.3 kg/m²), 58.9% (96) adequately estimated their diabetes risk (moderate or high chance) at baseline. These women smoked less often [2.06% (2) vs. 10.3% (7), p = 0.034], reported less anxiety (11.6 ± 3.0 vs. 12.6 ± 3.5, p = 0.040), and reported fewer symptoms of depression [30.9% (21) vs. 15.6% (15), p = 0.023] compared to women who underestimated their risk. At one year, 58.3% (95) of all women adequately estimated their diabetes risk. In the intervention group, 50.6% (41) adequately estimated their risk at baseline, increasing to 56.8% (46) by the end of the intervention after one year (p = 0.638). In the control group, a higher proportion of women adequately estimated their risk at baseline [67.1% (55), (p = 0.039)], which decreased to 59.8% (49) at one year (p = 0.376), with no significant difference in risk perception between the groups at one year (p = 0.638). Conclusions: Almost 60% of this high-risk population adequately estimated their diabetes risk, with no significant impact of the lifestyle intervention on risk perception.

Aims: To examine the association between depressive symptoms and metabolic profile in women with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and early postpartum prediabetes, and to explore whether a mobile-based lifestyle intervention affected mental health outcomes. Methods: Secondary, exploratory analysis of a multi-centric randomized controlled trial (MELINDA), evaluating a mobile-based lifestyle intervention versus standard follow-up (control group) in women with prediabetes after GDM. The analysis included 166 participants who completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies–Depression (CES-D) questionnaire [score of ≥16 being suggestive for (sub)clinical depression] at baseline (6–16 weeks postpartum) and one year post-randomization. Results: At one year, 26.5% of women (n = 44) reported depressive symptoms, with no significant difference between the intervention and control groups (30.5% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.293). Women with depressive symptoms (symptomatic women) were younger (30.9 ± 4.9 vs. 32.5 ± 3.8 years, p = 0.033) and were less often highly educated (61.4% vs. 80.3%, p = 0.028). At baseline, symptomatic women had a higher rate of metabolic syndrome (38.6% vs. 21.9%, p = 0.044), higher LDL-cholesterol [3.2 ± 0.8 vs. 2.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, p = 0.009], lower quality of life (lower SF-36 scores, p < 0.050) and a higher level of anxiety based on the STAI-6 questionnaire (14.5 ± 3.6 vs. 11.2 ± 2.6, p < 0.001). These differences persisted at one year postpartum with worse metabolic profile, more anxiety and lower quality of life in symptomatic women. Conclusions: Depressive symptoms are common in women with prediabetes in early postpartum after GDM and are associated with a persistent worse metabolic profile, increased anxiety and lower quality of life postpartum. The mobile-based lifestyle intervention did not improve mental health.

The Belgian Diabetes in Pregnancy follow-up study (BEDIP-FUS) aims to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI), adiposity and different degrees of glucose intolerance on the metabolic profile and future risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D) in women and offspring five years after delivery in the BEDIP study. The BEDIP study was a prospective cohort study to evaluate different screening strategies for gestational diabetes (GDM) based on the 2013 WHO criteria. The aim of the BEDIP-FUS is to recruit 375 women–offspring pairs, stratified according to three different subgroups based on the antenatal result of the glucose challenge test (GCT) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) during the BEDIP pregnancy. The follow-up visit consists of a 75 g OGTT, anthropometric measurements and questionnaires for the mothers, and a fasting blood sample with anthropometric measurements for the child. Primary outcome for the mother is glucose intolerance defined by the American Diabetes Association criteria and for the offspring the BMI z-score. Recruitment began in January 2021. The BEDIP-FUS study will help to better individualize follow-up in women with different degrees of hyperglycemia in pregnancy and their offspring.