Lorenzo A. Menicanti

Dr. Lorenzo A. Menicanti


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

49Years (1978-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 August 2010 in European Heart Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
D(Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)
Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)
WWWilliam Wyns
William Wyns
PKP. Kolh
P. Kolh
NDNicolas Danchin
Nicolas Danchin
CMCarlo Di Mario
Carlo Di Mario
MZMarian Zembala
Marian Zembala
Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all available evidence with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome and the risk–benefit ratio of diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks and their legal implications have been discussed previously. Guidelines and recommendations should help physicians to make decisions in their daily practice. However, the ultimate judgement regarding the care of an individual patient must be made by his/her responsible physician(s).

1 November 2013 in American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MGMarco Guazzi
Marco Guazzi
FBF. Bandera
F. Bandera
GPG. Pelissero
G. Pelissero
SCserenella castelvecchio
serenella castelvecchio
LMLorenzo A. Menicanti
Lorenzo A. Menicanti
RARoss Arena
Ross Arena
Echo-derived pulmonary arterial systolic pressure (PASP) and right ventricular (RV) tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE; from the end of diastole to end-systole) are of basic relevance in the clinical follow-up of heart failure (HF) patients, carrying two- to threefold increase in cardiac risk when increased and reduced, respectively. We hypothesized that the relationship between TAPSE (longitudinal RV fiber shortening) and PASP (force generated by the RV) provides an index of in vivo RV length-force relationship, with their ratio better disclosing prognosis. Two hundred ninety-three HF patients with reduced (HFrEF, n = 247) or with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (HFpEF, n = 46) underwent echo-Doppler studies and N-terminal pro-brain-type natriuretic peptide assessment and were tracked for adverse events. The median follow-up duration was 20.8 mo. TAPSE vs. PASP relationship showed a downward regression line shift in nonsurvivors who were more frequently presenting with higher PASP and lower TAPSE. HFrEF and HFpEF patients exhibited a similar distribution along the regression line. Given the TAPSE, PASP, and TAPSE-to-PASP ratio (TAPSE/PASP) collinearity, separate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed: one with TAPSE and PASP as individual measures, and the other combining them in ratio form. Hazard ratios for variables retained in the multivariate regression were as follows: TAPSE/PASP </≥ 0.36 mm/mmHg [hazard ratio (HR): 10.4, P < 0.001]; TAPSE </≥ 16 mm (HR: 5.1, P < 0.01); New York Heart Association functional class </≥ 3 (HR: 4.4, P < 0.001); E/e’ (HR: 4.1, P < 0.001). This study shows that the TAPSE vs. PASP relationship is shifted downward in nonsurvivors with a similar distribution in HFrEF and HFpEF, and their ratio improves prognostic resolution. The TAPSE vs. PASP relationship as a possible index of the length-force relationship may be a step forward for a more efficient RV function evaluation and is not affected by the quality of LV dysfunction.

23 April 2009 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RJRobert H. Jones
Robert H. Jones
EVEric J. Velazquez
Eric J. Velazquez
RMRobert E. Michler
Robert E. Michler
GSGeorge Sopko
George Sopko
JOJae K. Oh
Jae K. Oh
KLKerry L. Lee
Kerry L. Lee
Surgical ventricular reconstruction is a specific procedure designed to reduce left ventricular volume in patients with heart failure caused by coronary artery disease. We conducted a trial to address the question of whether surgical ventricular reconstruction added to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) would decrease the rate of death or hospitalization for cardiac causes, as compared with CABG alone. Between September 2002 and January 2006, a total of 1000 patients with an ejection fraction of 35% or less, coronary artery disease that was amenable to CABG, and dominant anterior left ventricular dysfunction that was amenable to surgical ventricular reconstruction were randomly assigned to undergo either CABG alone (499 patients) or CABG with surgical ventricular reconstruction (501 patients). The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause and hospitalization for cardiac causes. The median follow-up was 48 months. Surgical ventricular reconstruction reduced the end-systolic volume index by 19%, as compared with a reduction of 6% with CABG alone. Cardiac symptoms and exercise tolerance improved from baseline to a similar degree in the two study groups. However, no significant difference was observed in the primary outcome, which occurred in 292 patients (59%) who were assigned to undergo CABG alone and in 289 patients (58%) who were assigned to undergo CABG with surgical ventricular reconstruction (hazard ratio for the combined approach, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.84 to 1.17; P=0.90). Adding surgical ventricular reconstruction to CABG reduced the left ventricular volume, as compared with CABG alone. However, this anatomical change was not associated with a greater improvement in symptoms or exercise tolerance or with a reduction in the rate of death or hospitalization for cardiac causes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00023595.)

1 January 2005 in The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
STSanti Trimarchi
Santi Trimarchi
CNChristoph A. Nienaber
Christoph A. Nienaber
VRVincenzo Rampoldi
Vincenzo Rampoldi
TMTruls Myrmel
Truls Myrmel
TSToru Suzuki
Toru Suzuki
KEKim A. Eagle
Kim A. Eagle

1 October 2004 in JACC
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CAConstantine L. Athanasuleas
Constantine L. Athanasuleas
GBGerald D. Buckberg
Gerald D. Buckberg
ASAlfred W.H. Stanley
Alfred W.H. Stanley
WSWilliam Siler
William Siler
VDVincent Dor
Vincent Dor
KAKevin A. Accola
Kevin A. Accola

23 June 2009 in Circulation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Marco RanucciMarco Ranucci
Marco Ranucci
SCserenella castelvecchio
serenella castelvecchio
LMLorenzo A. Menicanti
Lorenzo A. Menicanti
AFAlessandro Frigiola
Alessandro Frigiola
GPGabriele Pelissero
Gabriele Pelissero
Background— Several mortality risk scores exist in cardiac surgery. All include a considerable number of independent risk factors. In elective cardiac surgery patients, the operative mortality is low, the number of events recorded per year is limited, and the risk model may be overfitted. The present study aims to develop and validate an operative mortality risk score for elective patients based on a limited number of factors. Methods and Results— The development series included 4557 adult patients who had undergone an elective cardiac operation at our institution from 2001 to 2003; the validation series includes the 4091 patients who subsequently underwent an operation. Three independent factors were included in the mortality risk model: age, creatinine, and left ventricular ejection fraction (ACEF). The ACEF score was computed as follows: age (years)/ejection fraction (%)+1 (if serum creatinine value was >2 mg/dL). The ACEF score was compared with 5 other risk scores in the validation series. Discriminatory power (accuracy) was defined with a receiver-operating characteristics analysis. The best accuracy was achieved by the Cleveland Clinic score (0.812), with ACEF score just below it (0.808). In coronary operations, the 2 scores performed equally well (0.815 versus 0.813), and in isolated coronary operations, the best accuracy was achieved by ACEF (0.826), with the Cleveland Clinic score at 0.806. Conclusion— A risk model limited to 3 independent predictors has similar or better accuracy and calibration compared with more complex risk scores if applied to elective cardiac operations.