Ahmet Hamdi Kepekçi

Dr. Ahmet Hamdi Kepekçi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAhmet Hamdi Kepekçi
Ahmet Hamdi Kepekçi
HBHasan Huseyin Balikci
Hasan Huseyin Balikci
Tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy is the most common surgical procedure in ENT practice and the malignancy rate of tonsillar tissue is very rare. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the necessity of routine histopathologic examinations following tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy surgeries. A total of 385 patients between the age of 5 and 16 years who were admitted to our ENT clinic and underwent adenoidectomy and/or tonsillectomy between October 2008 and July 2015 participated in the study. Patient data such as age, sex, indication for surgery, and histopathologic findings were recorded prospectively. Histopathologic findings were analyzed for hyperplastic lymphoid parenchyma and malignancy. No malignancies were detected in the studied patients and all had hyperplastic lymphoid parenchyma. Unilateral tonsillar swelling, significant lesions on the tonsil or adenoid tissue, malignancy history in the head and neck region, or a mass in the neck region with weight loss must be examined histopathologically; however, we conclude that there is no need to perform histopathologic examination for patients for whom there is no clinical suspicion. A meta-analysis is needed in this regard.

1 June 2017
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FEFuat Erel
Fuat Erel
NSNurhan Sarioglu
Nurhan Sarioglu
MKMehmet Köse
Mehmet Köse
MKMustafa Kaymakçi
Mustafa Kaymakçi
MGMucahide Gokcen
Mucahide Gokcen
MAMehmet Arslan
Mehmet Arslan

20 April 2021 in Turkish Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAhmet Hamdi Kepekçi
Ahmet Hamdi Kepekçi
GGGül İpek Gündoğan
Gül İpek Gündoğan
CKCenk Kig
Cenk Kig
Betahistine is a histamine analog commonly prescribed for symptomatic treatment of vertiginous symptoms. In vitro studies have shown that betahistine was not toxic at the prescribed doses in a nasal epithelial cell line. However, the effect of betahistine on other cell types has not been studied. In this study, we aimed to investigate some of the physiological effects of betahistine on L929 fibroblast, A549 lung cancer, human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVEC), and Ishikawa endometrial cell lines. Cellular proliferation was assed assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, apoptosis was evaluated by acridine orange-ethidium bromide staining, and cellular migration was assed assessed by scratch assay. Betahistine treatment (0.1-0.5 mg/mL, 24 hours) can inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in HUVEC, A549, Ishikawa, and L929 cell lines. Betahistine (≥0.1 mg/mL) significantly increased the number of apoptotic cells (HUVEC: 26.3%, A549: 17.3%, L929: 8.6%, and Ishikawa: 2.3%). Betahistine at doses over 0.1 mg/mL significantly suppressed the cell migration rate in all of the cell lines. In contrast, exposure to a low dose of betahistine (0.025 mg/mL) induced migration rates of HUVEC and Ishikawa cells by 81% and 48%, respectively. Betahistine may alter the processes of cellular proliferation, apoptosis, and cellular migration in a cell line- and dose-dependent manner. In this sense, proliferative and metastatic properties of certain cancer cells can potentially be altered in response to betahistine treatment.

3 June 2025 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAhmet Hamdi Kepekçi
Ahmet Hamdi Kepekçi
Background/Objectives: Prominent ear deformity is one of the most common congenital anomalies and may lead to substantial aesthetic and psychosocial distress, particularly in children and young adults. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of three frequently used otoplasty techniques, Mustardé sutures, fascioperichondrial flap, and their combination, concerning recurrence rates, complications, and patient satisfaction. Methods: This retrospective analysis included data from 365 patients who underwent otoplasty between 2017 and 2023 at a single institution, with all procedures performed by the same surgeon. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the surgical technique employed: Mustardé (n = 71), fascioperichondrial flap (n = 232), and a combined technique (n = 62). The primary outcome was the recurrence rate, while secondary outcomes included the type of suture material, complication rates, and aesthetic satisfaction. Results: The lowest recurrence rate was observed in the fascioperichondrial flap group (6.5%), followed by the combined group (8.5%) and the Mustardé group (29.6%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the flap technique was associated with a 3.79-fold reduction in recurrence risk compared with the Mustardé method (p = 0.033). Overall complication rates were low across all groups. Hematoma occurred only in the flap group (1.3%), while suture extrusion and granuloma formation were exclusive to the Mustardé group. The highest aesthetic satisfaction was reported in the combined technique group. Conclusion: The fascioperichondrial flap method demonstrated statistically superior outcomes in minimizing recurrence and complications in prominent ear surgery. While the Mustardé technique demands careful patient selection due to its higher recurrence risk, the combined approach appears particularly beneficial for complex auricular deformities. The robust sample size and surgical standardization in this study provide valuable insights for surgical decision making in otoplasty. To our knowledge, this is one of the largest single-surgeon case series evaluating recurrence and complication outcomes in otoplasty.

15 June 2019
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAhmet Hamdi Kepekçi
Ahmet Hamdi Kepekçi
ZEZehragul Ergul
Zehragul Ergul
AGAlper Gultekin
Alper Gultekin
EKErdal Karaoz
Erdal Karaoz

4 May 2020 in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAli Bestemi Kepekci
Ali Bestemi Kepekci
AKAhmet Hamdi Kepekçi
Ahmet Hamdi Kepekçi
Aim: The prominent ear is the most common congenital deformity of the external ear. Otoplasty is performed to correct the appearance of the prominent ear. This study was planned to compare the analgesic and anesthetic effects of local nerve blockade and local infiltration anesthesia in the otoplasties. Method: Thirty-two patients who underwent otoplasty in both ears between February 2018 and March 2019 were included in the study. Three patients were excluded because they refused regional anesthesia. In the patients included in the study, only local infiltration anesthesia was applied to 1 ear and regional nerve blockade was applied to the other ear. Regional nerve blockade was applied to the study group; local infiltration anesthesia was applied to the control group. Surgical and anesthetic complications were recorded. The onset time, duration and severity of pain were followed. Numerical evaluation scale scores were used to evaluate pain levels. Results: It was observed that the first pain of the patients On the side where regional nerve block (RNB) anesthesia was applied after an average of 10.5 hours. On the other hand on the side where local infiltration anesthesia was applied; the pain was observed to start after an average of 3.5 hours. At the 6th and 12th hours postoperatively, the scores of the numerical evaluation scale were significantly lower in the study group than the control group (P < 0.05). At the 24th-hour pain score, the values were lower in the study group, but the difference was not significant between the groups (P > 0.05). In the regional anesthesia group, can develop such as difficulty in swallowing, weakness in the neck, weakness in the upper extremity, nausea, Horner syndrome; but all side effects resolve spontaneously within 6 to 12 hours. Conclusion: The application of regional anesthesia in prominent ear surgical procedures can be considered as an alternative method to provide better quality preoperative anesthesia and better quality postoperative analgesia in patients.