Mammary cancer is the most frequently diagnosed neoplasia in women and non-spayed female dogs and is one of the leading causes of death in both species. Canines develop spontaneous mammary tumors that share a significant number of biological, clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics with human breast cancers. This review provides a detailed description of the histological, molecular and clinical aspects of mammary cancer in canines; it discusses risk factors and currently available diagnostic and treatment options, as well as remaining challenges and unanswered questions. The incidence of mammary tumors is highly variable and is impacted by biological, pathological, cultural and socioeconomic factors, including hormonal status, breed, advanced age, obesity and diet. Diagnosis is mainly based on histopathology, although several efforts have been made to establish a molecular classification of canine mammary tumors to widen the spectrum of treatment options, which today rely heavily on surgical removal of tumors. Lastly, standardization of clinical study protocols, development of canine-specific biological tools, establishment of adequate dog-specific disease biomarkers and identification of targets for the development of new therapies that could improve survival and have less adverse effects than chemotherapy are among the remaining challenges.

Mammary tumors are the most common neoplasms diagnosed in female dogs and have been considered excellent models for studying human breast cancer. Establishing cell lines from primary cultures of canine mammary tumors provides an in vitro model to better understand the disease and develop new treatments. This study aimed to establish and characterize canine mammary tumor cell lines. Ten cell cultures were generated from tumor tissue obtained from affected dogs, including seven from primary mammary tumors and three from metastatic sites. Characterization included molecular marker expression (ER, PR, HER2, cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6), vimentin, and the marker of cell proliferation Ki67) and in vitro tumorigenic capacity assessment. Additionally, the susceptibility of five cell lines to DOX, 5-FU, paclitaxel, colchicine, and carboplatin was evaluated using the MTT assay. ICC analysis revealed negative expression of hormonal receptors (ER and PR) in five cell lines, while only one cell line was positive for both. Six cell lines were HER2-negative and positive for vimentin. Five cell lines exhibited in vitro tumorigenic capacity, forming colonies in soft agar. DOX showed the highest growth-inhibitory effect (DOX > Paclitaxel > Colchicine > 5-FU > Carboplatin). Two cell lines had a minimal concentration for 50% inhibition in vitro (IC₅₀) < 0.63 µM and 4.37 ± 0.40 µM for DOX, while one was sensitive to colchicine and paclitaxel (IC₅₀ 0.19 µM and 0.04 µM, respectively). All tested cell lines were resistant to carboplatin and 5-FU. These cell lines provide a valuable model for studying breast cancer in humans and dogs and evaluating new potential therapeutic strategies.