Emanuel Weitschek

Dr. Emanuel Weitschek


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 January 2012 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RVRobin Van Velzen
Robin Van Velzen
EWEmanuel Weitschek
Emanuel Weitschek
GFGiovanni Felici
Giovanni Felici
FBFreek T. Bakker
Freek T. Bakker
Recently diverged species are challenging for identification, yet they are frequently of special interest scientifically as well as from a regulatory perspective. DNA barcoding has proven instrumental in species identification, especially in insects and vertebrates, but for the identification of recently diverged species it has been reported to be problematic in some cases. Problems are mostly due to incomplete lineage sorting or simply lack of a ‘barcode gap’ and probably related to large effective population size and/or low mutation rate. Our objective was to compare six methods in their ability to correctly identify recently diverged species with DNA barcodes: neighbor joining and parsimony (both tree-based), nearest neighbor and BLAST (similarity-based), and the diagnostic methods DNA-BAR, and BLOG. We analyzed simulated data assuming three different effective population sizes as well as three selected empirical data sets from published studies. Results show, as expected, that success rates are significantly lower for recently diverged species (∼75%) than for older species (∼97%) (P<0.00001). Similarity-based and diagnostic methods significantly outperform tree-based methods, when applied to simulated DNA barcode data (P<0.00001). The diagnostic method BLOG had highest correct query identification rate based on simulated (86.2%) as well as empirical data (93.1%), indicating that it is a consistently better method overall. Another advantage of BLOG is that it offers species-level information that can be used outside the realm of DNA barcoding, for instance in species description or molecular detection assays. Even though we can confirm that identification success based on DNA barcoding is generally high in our data, recently diverged species remain difficult to identify. Nevertheless, our results contribute to improved solutions for their accurate identification.

26 May 2022 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DPDaniele Pirrone
Daniele Pirrone
EWEmanuel Weitschek
Emanuel Weitschek
PPPrimiano Di Paolo
Primiano Di Paolo
SSSimona De Salvo
Simona De Salvo
Maria Cristina De ColaMaria Cristina De Cola
Maria Cristina De Cola
Electroencephalography (EEG) signal analysis is a fast, inexpensive, and accessible technique to detect the early stages of dementia, such as Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In the last years, EEG signal analysis has become an important topic of research to extract suitable biomarkers to determine the subject’s cognitive impairment. In this work, we propose a novel simple and efficient method able to extract features with a finite response filter (FIR) in the double time domain in order to discriminate among patients affected by AD, MCI, and healthy controls (HC). Notably, we compute the power intensity for each high- and low-frequency band, using their absolute differences to distinguish among the three classes of subjects by means of different supervised machine learning methods. We use EEG recordings from a cohort of 105 subjects (48 AD, 37 MCI, and 20 HC) referred for dementia to the IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo” of Messina, Italy. The findings show that this method reaches 97%, 95%, and 83% accuracy when considering binary classifications (HC vs. AD, HC vs. MCI, and MCI vs. AD) and an accuracy of 75% when dealing with the three classes (HC vs. AD vs. MCI). These results improve upon those obtained in previous studies and demonstrate the validity of our approach. Finally, the efficiency of the proposed method might allow its future development on embedded devices for low-cost real-time diagnosis.

30 May 2011 in Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IAIvan Arisi
Ivan Arisi
MDMara D'ONofrio
Mara D'ONofrio
RBRossella Brandi
Rossella Brandi
AFArmando Felsani
Armando Felsani
SCSimona Capsoni
Simona Capsoni
ACAntonino Cattaneo
Antonino Cattaneo
The identification of early and stage-specific biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical, as the development of disease-modification therapies may depend on the discovery and validation of such markers. The identification of early reliable biomarkers depends on the development of new diagnostic algorithms to computationally exploit the information in large biological datasets. To identify potential biomarkers from mRNA expression profile data, we used the Logic Mining method for the unbiased analysis of a large microarray expression dataset from the anti-NGF AD11 transgenic mouse model. The gene expression profile of AD11 brain regions was investigated at different neurodegeneration stages by whole genome microarrays. A new implementation of the Logic Mining method was applied both to early (1–3 months) and late stage (6–15 months) expression data, coupled to standard statistical methods. A small number of “fingerprinting” formulas was isolated, encompassing mRNAs whose expression levels were able to discriminate between diseased and control mice. We selected three differential “signature” genes specific for the early stage (Nudt19, Arl16, Aph1b), five common to both groups (Slc15a2, Agpat5, Sox2ot, 2210015, D19Rik, Wdfy1), and seven specific for late stage (D14Ertd449, Tia1, Txnl4, 1810014B01Rik, Snhg3, Actl6a, Rnf25). We suggest these genes as potential biomarkers for the early and late stage of AD-like neurodegeneration in this model and conclude that Logic Mining is a powerful and reliable approach for large scale expression data analysis. Its application to large expression datasets from brain or peripheral human samples may facilitate the discovery of early and stage-specific AD biomarkers.

28 January 2013 in Molecular Ecology Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EWEmanuel Weitschek
Emanuel Weitschek
RVRobin Van Velzen
Robin Van Velzen
GFGiovanni Felici
Giovanni Felici
PBPaola Bertolazzi
Paola Bertolazzi

11 April 2014 in BioData Mining
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EWEmanuel Weitschek
Emanuel Weitschek
Giulia FisconGiulia Fiscon
Giulia Fiscon
GFGiovanni Felici
Giovanni Felici
Specific fragments, coming from short portions of DNA (e.g., mitochondrial, nuclear, and plastid sequences), have been defined as DNA Barcode and can be used as markers for organisms of the main life kingdoms. Species classification with DNA Barcode sequences has been proven effective on different organisms. Indeed, specific gene regions have been identified as Barcode: COI in animals, rbcL and matK in plants, and ITS in fungi. The classification problem assigns an unknown specimen to a known species by analyzing its Barcode. This task has to be supported with reliable methods and algorithms.

10 November 2009 in BMC Bioinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPaola Bertolazzi
Paola Bertolazzi
GFGiovanni Felici
Giovanni Felici
EWEmanuel Weitschek
Emanuel Weitschek
According to many field experts, specimens classification based on morphological keys needs to be supported with automated techniques based on the analysis of DNA fragments. The most successful results in this area are those obtained from a particular fragment of mitochondrial DNA, the gene cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) (the "barcode"). Since 2004 the Consortium for the Barcode of Life (CBOL) promotes the collection of barcode specimens and the development of methods to analyze the barcode for several tasks, among which the identification of rules to correctly classify an individual into its species by reading its barcode.