Limited data exist about the prognostic significance of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) after contemporary primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). The objective of this study was to identify the incidence and predictors of new-onset AF and associated adverse 30-day outcomes in AF patients who underwent pPCI. We analyzed 2096 patients undergoing pPCI after pretreatment with 600 mg clopidogrel. Composite 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events were the primary end point. A logistic regression model was developed to identify risk factors for the occurrence of AF and prediction of its impact on 30-day outcomes. AF occurred in 6.2% of patients. Older age, Killip >1 heart failure at admission, systolic blood pressure of greater than 100 mmHg at admission, creatinine clearance greater than 60 ml/min, preprocedural infarction-related artery occlusion and postprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow less than 3 were identified as independent predictors of the occurrence of AF. Rates of 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47-3.87] and 30-day death (adjusted OR 2.67, 95% CI: 1.46-4.89) were higher in AF patients compared with patients without AF. A trend toward higher rate of ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization was observed in the AF group (adjusted OR 2.61, 95% CI: 0.82-8.39, P=0.10). New-onset AF after pPCI is associated with adverse 30-day outcomes. Accurate prediction of AF after pPCI might help deciding a more aggressive treatment approach aimed at preventing the adverse prognosis of these patients.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to numerous negative implications for all aspects of society. Although COVID-19 is a predominant lung disease, in 10–30% of cases, it is associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The presence of myocardial injury in COVID-19 patients occurs with a frequency between 7–36%. There is growing evidence of the incidence of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in COVID-19, both due to coronary artery thrombosis and insufficient oxygen supply to the myocardium in conditions of an increased need. The diagnosis and treatment of patients with COVID-19 and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major challenge for physicians. Often the presence of mixed symptoms, due to the combined presence of COVID-19 and ACS, as well as possible other diseases, nonspecific changes in the electrocardiogram (ECG), and often elevated serum troponin (cTn), create dilemmas in diagnosing ACS in COVID-19. Given the often-high ischemic risk, as well as the risk of bleeding, in these patients and analyzing the benefit/risk ratio, the treatment of patients with AMI and COVID-19 is often associated with dilemmas and difficult decisions. Due to delays in the application of the therapeutic regimen, complications of AMI are more common, and the mortality rate is higher.

Studies with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPIs) showed conflicting results in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) patients who were pretreated with 600 mg clopidogrel. We sought to investigate the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of the periprocedural administration of tirofiban in a largest Serbian PPCI centre. We analysed 2995 consecutive PPCI patients enrolled in the Clinical Center of Serbia STEMI Register, between February 2007 and March 2012. All patients were pretreated with 600 mg clopidogrel and 300 mg aspirin. Major adverse cardiovascular events, comprising all-cause death, nonfatal infarction, nonfatal stroke, and ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularization, was the primary efficacy end point. TIMI major bleeding was the key safety end point. Analyses drawn from the propensity-matched sample showed improved primary efficacy end point in the tirofiban group at 30-day (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53–0.97) and at 1-year (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57–0.96) follow up. Moreover, tirofiban group had a significantly lower 30-day all-cause mortality (secondary end point; OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40–0.90), compared with patients who were not administered tirofiban. At 1 year, a trend towards a lower all-cause mortality was observed in the tirofiban group (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53–1.04). No differences were found with respect to the TIMI major bleeding during the follow-up period. Tirofiban administered with PPCI, following 600 mg clopidogrel pretreatment, improved primary efficacy outcome at 30 days and at 1 year follow up without an increase in major bleeding.

Bleeding is a potentially catastrophic complication after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). It occurs most frequently within the first 30 days following the intervention. The aim of this study was to generate a simple and accurate risk model for the prediction of bleeding after PPCI. The training set included 2,096 patients enrolled in the RISK-PCI trial. The model was validated using a database of 961 patients enrolled in the ART-PCI trial. Bleeding was defined as type ≥3a bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definition. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the predictors of outcome. A sum of weighted points for specific predictors was calculated to determine the final score. The model included 5 independent predictors of 30-day bleeding: gender (female); history of peptic ulcer; creatinine clearance at admission (1 heart failure at admission. The model showed good discrimination and calibration for the prediction of bleeding in the derivation set (C-statistic, 0.79; goodness of fit, P=0.12) and in the validation set (C-statistic, 0.76; goodness of fit, P=0.37). Patients were classified into 3 risk classes and the observed incidence of 30-day bleeding of 1.0%, 3.5% and 10.7% corresponded to the low-, intermediate- and high-risk classes, respectively. A simple risk model was developed that has a reasonably good capacity for the prediction of 30-day bleeding after PPCI.