Simeon Iliev

Mr. Simeon Iliev


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMIliya Mangarov
Iliya Mangarov
YVYulian Voynikov
Yulian Voynikov
VPValentina Petkova
Valentina Petkova
SISimeon Iliev
Simeon Iliev
IKIvanka Kostadinova
Ivanka Kostadinova
INIrina Nikolova Nikolova
Irina Nikolova Nikolova
Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA, also known as thioctic acid) was discovered nearly 90 years ago and began to be used in clinical practice in the late 1950s. Numerous nonclinical and clinical studies have investigated ALA for treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and various other diseases. The rising global prevalence of DPN necessitates timely treatment; however, there is currently no effective cure. Current guideline-recommended therapies for DPN provide symptom relief rather than modifying the disease. Among the pathogenesis-oriented therapies, ALA holds a unique position as a universal antioxidant, essential for every cell in the body. This review highlights the ongoing issues and challenges in using ALA to treat DPN. While confronting a complex disease with poorly understood pathophysiology, we also have an endogenous substance with pleiotropic effects on all cells in the human body. It becomes clear that this is a highly multifactorial process that will likely never be precisely defined. This does not diminish the significance of ALA in treating DPN but underscores the need for a deeper understanding of when to start therapy, dosage, duration, and monitoring. In this comprehensive review, we evaluate the achievements of the past 70 years and highlight gaps in ALA’s role in treating DPN.

16 September 2025 in Antibiotics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IMIliya Mangarov
Iliya Mangarov
SISimeon Iliev
Simeon Iliev
YVYulian Voynikov
Yulian Voynikov
VPValentina Petkova
Valentina Petkova
IPIva Parvova
Iva Parvova
INIrina Nikolova Nikolova
Irina Nikolova Nikolova
Premature infants are an especially vulnerable group that often needs extended intensive care. Prematurity naturally hampers the development of the immune system, significantly increasing the risk of infections. In the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), antibiotic treatment is often a crucial, life-saving measure. For parents, the birth of a very preterm infant (before 32 weeks of gestation) turns what should be a happy event into a period filled with deep uncertainty and distress. Maintaining hope amid these difficulties relies heavily on maintaining regular communication with and trusting the medical team. Clinical realities in the NICU include a high risk of infection that requires multiple medications, including antibiotics. There is an inverse relationship between gestational age and pharmaceutical exposure. Parents worry about the amount of medication their child receives and the potential long-term effects on development. Over the past thirty years, initiatives such as antimicrobial stewardship programs have worked to reduce antibiotic use and treatment duration in the NICU, emphasizing proper care for premature infants worldwide. This article examines the ethical landscape from the perspectives of three primary stakeholders: parents, healthcare providers, and regulatory bodies. The key ethical question is whether these groups achieve meaningful cooperation or if institutional and professional priorities overshadow clinical practice. In the NICU, decision-making responsibility mainly lies with the medical team, as parents often have limited influence over treatment decisions, and regulatory oversight usually occurs indirectly. This concentration of authority underscores the complex and critical nature of neonatal intensive care.