The long-term survival of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated according to the current standard of care is excellent. Combined-modality schedules (ABVD plus radiotherapy) in early-stage disease, along with treatment intensity adaptation to early metabolic response assessed by PET/CT in advanced stage HL, have been the cornerstones of risk stratification and treatment decision-making, minimizing treatment-related complications while keeping efficacy. Nevertheless, a non-negligible number of patients are primary refractory or relapse after front-line treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents, namely Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), have already shown outstanding efficacy in a relapsed/refractory setting in recent landmark studies. Several phase 2 single-arm studies suggest that the addition of these agents in the frontline setting could further improve long-term disease control permitting one to reduce the exposure to cytotoxic drugs. However, a longer follow-up is needed. At the time of this writing, the only randomized phase 3 trial so far published is the ECHELON-1, which compares 1 to 1 BV-AVD (Bleomycin is replaced by BV) with standard ABVD in untreated advanced-stage III and IV HL. The ECHELON-1 trial has proven that BV-AVD is safe and more effective both in terms of long-term disease control and overall survival. Just recently, the results of the S1826 SWOG trial demonstrated that the combination nivolumab-AVD (N-AVD) is better than BV-AVD, while preliminary results of other randomized ongoing phase 3 trials incorporating anti-PD-1 in this setting will be soon available. The aim of this review is to present the recent data regarding these novel agents in first-line treatment of HL and to highlight current and future trends which will hopefully reshape the overall management of this disease.

The significance of serum beta-2 microglobulin (sβ₂m) in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is controversial. We analyzed 915 patients with HL, who were treated with ABVD or equivalent regimens with or without radiotherapy. Sβ₂m levels were measured by a radioimmunoassay (upper normal limit 2.4 mg/L). Sequential cutoffs (1.8–3.0 by 0.1 mg/L increments, 3.5 and 4.0 mg/L) were tested along with ROC analysis. The median sβ₂m levels were 2.20 mg/L and were elevated (>2.4 mg/L) in 383/915 patients (41.9%). Higher sβ₂m was associated with inferior freedom from progression (FFP) at all tested cutoffs. The best cutoff was 2.0 mg/L (10-year FFP 83% vs. 70%, p = 0.001), which performed better than the 2.4 mg/L cutoff (“normal versus high”). In multivariate analysis, sβ₂m > 2.0 mg/L was an independent adverse prognostic factor in the whole patient population. In multivariate overall survival analysis, sβ₂m levels were predictive at 2.0 mg/L cutoff in the whole patient population and in advanced stages. Similarly, sβ₂m > 2.0 mg/L independently predicted inferior HL-specific survival in the whole patient population. Our data suggest that higher sβ₂m is an independent predictor of outcome in HL but the optimal cutoff lies within the normal limits (i.e., at 2.0 mg/L) in this predominantly young patient population, performing much better than a “normal versus high” cutoff set at 2.4 mg/L.

Disease-related malnutrition (DRM) is highly prevalent among patients with hematologic malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of DRM in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancies and investigate the level of awareness of DRM among the medical team treating this group of patients. A cross sectional quality clinical audit took place in two hematology units of a tertiary university hospital. Inpatients were screened within 48 h of their admission using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) to identify their nutritional risk, and they were reassessed to identify the implemented interventions during their hospitalization. One hundred eighty-five patients were included in the audit analysis. On admission, 37.3% of the audited population was identified as being at high risk of malnutrition according to the MUST score. Forty-nine (26.5%) patients reported reduced food intake during the past 5 days, while four (2.2%) reported no food intake. During the hospitalization, only five patients (2.7%) received nutritional support, as indicated. Low levels of awareness of the early detection and treatment of DMS were found. Moreover, the prevalence of DRM and low nutritional intake was reported to be low. Measures to increase awareness of DMR in the medical team and better coordination of the nutrition support teams is vital to ensure better management and early nutrition intervention in hematological patients.

Background: R-DA-EPOCH is an effective regimen for PMLBCL, which permits the omission of consolidative radiotherapy in the majority of patients. Patient: We describe a 27-year-old female patient, who achieved a complete remission after treatment with six cycles of R-DA-EPOCH (up to the final level). At 6 months after the end of treatment, PET/CT revealed an unexpected, diffusely increased ¹⁸FDG uptake by the bone marrow. Simultaneously, pancytopenia with monocytosis was observed. Result: The patient was diagnosed with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome, which rapidly evolved into acute myeloid leukemia (t-MDS/AML) with MLL rearrangements. She achieved a complete remission after induction therapy, received an allogenic transplant and remains disease-free 2 years later. Conclusions: The extremely early onset of t-MDS/AML, together with the unexpected PET/CT findings make this case unique and highlights the need for the accurate estimation of the possible dose-dependent risk of t-MDS/AML after R-DA-EPOCH in the real-life setting in patients with PMLBCL.

Background/Objectives: The National Cancer Institute introduced the intensified R-da-EPOCH regimen in primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL) to improve outcomes while minimizing radiotherapy use. However, there is no randomized comparison of R-da-EPOCH vs. R-CHOP-21. The objective of this study was to compare R-da-EPOCH with R-CHOP-21 in consecutive patients with PMLBCL of a single, large referral center, where the R-da-EPOCH escalation schedule was strictly followed. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all 35 consecutive patients who received R-da-EPOCH (2017–2022) compared to 35 consecutive patients treated with R-CHOP-21 arm at the same Department, starting from the most recent patient and going backwards (2005–2017). Results: R-da-EPOCH was given strictly in 33/35 (94%) patients. The 5-year freedom from progression (FFP) was 91% vs. 69% (p = 0.027). The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) was 84% vs. 69% (p = 0.124). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 97% vs. 80% (p = 0.063). Among R-CHOP-21-responders, 20/29 (69%) received RT compared to 2/34 (6%) R-da-EPOCH-responders. In multivariate analysis, R-da-EPOCH remained better than R-CHOP-21 in terms of FFP [hazard ratios (HRs) 0.21–0.26, all p < 0.05] and was associated with very favorable HR for EFS and OS. Conclusions: Optimally delivered R-da-EPOCH minimized the use of RT in a real-life setting and provided superior outcomes than R-CHOP-21.

Primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma (PMLBCL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell lymphoma, sharing common features with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). PMLBCL is usually cured with single-hit immunochemotherapy in the first-line setting. Relapses tend to be aggressive and may be unresponsive to conventional chemotherapy. Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a viable option for chemosensitive patients; nevertheless, targeted therapies appear to be highly promising. Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) have already transformed the course of relapse/refractory disease, while CD-19-directed Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy may produce remarkably favorable outcomes. The exact position of CAR T-cells and CPIs in the treatment algorithm, along with the role of radiotherapy and ASCT, remains to be precisely determined. In the current review, we aim to present the recent research on targeted agents in PMLBCL and define their sequencing within the treatment algorithm, mainly in the relapse/refractory setting.